Analysis: Baby Heartbreak
Media Report Analysis
Referencing
Chicago Referencing Style:
Belle Taylor. 2012. Baby heartbreak. The Western Australia, 7 February 2012
(WORD COUNT: 1094)
Part A
Question 1:
In the chosen article – Baby heartbreak involved of four area of law as stated in below.
Criminal Law
Criminal Law is the action of bringing harmful, threatened and danger to the society. Mr Silverstro careless drove on the road was considered bringing danger to the society and his direct family. As stated in the article provided, “Matthew Silverstro pleaded guilty in Joondalup Magistrate’s court yesterday to dangerous driving causing grievous bodily harm….” “Although Silverstro, 34, was charged with causing his former partner Venessa De Bari …show more content…
Therefore he deserve for two years driving suspension and an $8000 fine punishment from the court.
Question 2:
(i) Allows people to organize and plan.
Mr Silverstro action show that he never organizes and plan on the road, causing former partner Ms Vanessa De Bari serious injury. Knowing law is everyone responsibility. By law, people should know what they can do and cannot do. Therefore people able to do the right things in organizing and planning to practice the right and follow the rules and regulation.
(ii) Encourages or discourage particular activities
In this article Mr Silvertro’s behavior is the good example of this function of law. His negligence on the road causing her former partner got serious injury yet creates havoc and danger to the people who was on the road. Mr Silverstro behavior consist of criminal offence, and it is not encourages to have such activities.
(iii) Creates rights and duties that can be …show more content…
The appellant was required to do the presentation and submit the academic write up for her final exam. However she lost all the stored data due to hard disk crashed one day before final date for the academic write up submission. Therefore she only able to submit all of her write up notes copied from Methuen commentary. At first, the University’s boards of examiners accused the appellant academic write up for plagiarism. She then told the boards that she had earlier explained the reason to her tutor regarding the weak submission on her academic write up, At the end the boards of examiners accepted appellant’s explanation and decided to re-mark her paper. However instead of accusing her for plagiarism, she was given 0 marks from the boards. Appellant was then upset on the board’s decision on her marks and decided pursue this matter to the governors, and the governor do agree that appellant do not deserve her result in 0 mark and request the boards of examiners should remark her paper. However the boards of examiners fail to do so and the secretary wrote a letter to appellant and saying that her paper no longer treated as a plagiarism but failure, and one more chance will be given to her to re-sit her examination in order for her to pass her degree. The condition of the re-sit examination is that she will not able to get a degree classification higher than a third class. As result after re-sitting
Referencing
Chicago Referencing Style:
Belle Taylor. 2012. Baby heartbreak. The Western Australia, 7 February 2012
(WORD COUNT: 1094)
Part A
Question 1:
In the chosen article – Baby heartbreak involved of four area of law as stated in below.
Criminal Law
Criminal Law is the action of bringing harmful, threatened and danger to the society. Mr Silverstro careless drove on the road was considered bringing danger to the society and his direct family. As stated in the article provided, “Matthew Silverstro pleaded guilty in Joondalup Magistrate’s court yesterday to dangerous driving causing grievous bodily harm….” “Although Silverstro, 34, was charged with causing his former partner Venessa De Bari …show more content…
Therefore he deserve for two years driving suspension and an $8000 fine punishment from the court.
Question 2:
(i) Allows people to organize and plan.
Mr Silverstro action show that he never organizes and plan on the road, causing former partner Ms Vanessa De Bari serious injury. Knowing law is everyone responsibility. By law, people should know what they can do and cannot do. Therefore people able to do the right things in organizing and planning to practice the right and follow the rules and regulation.
(ii) Encourages or discourage particular activities
In this article Mr Silvertro’s behavior is the good example of this function of law. His negligence on the road causing her former partner got serious injury yet creates havoc and danger to the people who was on the road. Mr Silverstro behavior consist of criminal offence, and it is not encourages to have such activities.
(iii) Creates rights and duties that can be …show more content…
The appellant was required to do the presentation and submit the academic write up for her final exam. However she lost all the stored data due to hard disk crashed one day before final date for the academic write up submission. Therefore she only able to submit all of her write up notes copied from Methuen commentary. At first, the University’s boards of examiners accused the appellant academic write up for plagiarism. She then told the boards that she had earlier explained the reason to her tutor regarding the weak submission on her academic write up, At the end the boards of examiners accepted appellant’s explanation and decided to re-mark her paper. However instead of accusing her for plagiarism, she was given 0 marks from the boards. Appellant was then upset on the board’s decision on her marks and decided pursue this matter to the governors, and the governor do agree that appellant do not deserve her result in 0 mark and request the boards of examiners should remark her paper. However the boards of examiners fail to do so and the secretary wrote a letter to appellant and saying that her paper no longer treated as a plagiarism but failure, and one more chance will be given to her to re-sit her examination in order for her to pass her degree. The condition of the re-sit examination is that she will not able to get a degree classification higher than a third class. As result after re-sitting