Preview

Analyse the successes and failures of Stalins policies in the 1930s

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1634 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analyse the successes and failures of Stalins policies in the 1930s
“Analyse the successes and failures of Stalin’s policies in the 1930’s”

Stalin’s policies in the 1930’s were both successful and not so successful for a variety of reasons which will be discussed throughout. In the 1930’s Stalin had to use many different devises in order to keep his dominance in leadership. These changes included Collectivization, Industrialisation in the first and second five year plans. Other policies which are discussed are The role of women, religion, arts and culture and education.

As Orlando Figes states in ‘The Whisperers’, “ Collectivization was the great turning point in Soviet history.” Stalin put in place collectivization in order to increase agricultural output and also more importantly the state would have control over the agriculture. As 80% of the Soviet Union population were peasants, they would be seen to be a force not to be reckoned with. However the will of the state will crush and bend the peasants. This succeeded in happening through the establishment of the “Kolkhozi” in 1929. This was a collective farms establishment to replace the individual farms owned by the peasants. Many peasants disagreed and refused to give up their land, when they did this they were branded ‘Kulaks’ and were then severely punished. For Stalin there were several successes to collectivization such as the USSR has an agrarian economy as most of its people lived in the countryside and worked the land, so collectivization gave state control to the main source of national wealth. Another is that agriculture would “pay tribute” to industry and cheap food could feed the cities and also be exported to finance the purchase of machinery from abroad. However despite these positive outcomes, collectivization was not a popular policy and in 1930 the shockingly poor harvest resulted in Stalin calling a temporary halt with his ‘Dizzy with Success’ article in Pravda. He also arranged for a small army named the 25000ers to do to the country side and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Joseph Stalin Dbq Analysis

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Joseph Stalin established a modern totalitarian government in Soviet Russia. He is known as the “Man of Steel”. A totalitarianism is a type of government that takes total, centralized, state control over every aspect of public and private life of their people. His rule had changed the people of his empire in numerous ways. Stalin had total control over economic needs. According to document 6 “By 1940 Russia produced more pig iron than Germany, and far more than Britain or France. Numbers of cattle grew in the 1920s, but fell increasingly during the collectivization of agriculture after 1929, and by 1940 hardly exceeded the figure for 1920. Since 1940 the industrial development of the Soviet Union has been impressive, but agricultural production has continued to be plumiding”. The document illustrates how pig iron had significantly increased as a result of the “Five Year Plan”, however heavy industry led to expense of food supplies. This would cause limited production of consumer goods. It caused a step back because of the severe shortages of housing, food, clothing as well as other necessary goods. The Five Year Plan didn’t help much to excel their economic as Stalin hoped, it impacted by creating famine. Stalin rising to power promised an economic boom for Russia however, in that process many people suffered and died of starvation. According to document 5, “The purge began its last,…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay I will discuss whether Stalin's position as General Secretary was the most important factor in his seize of power. Stalin's position as General Secretary was very important as it gave him control over the whole party machine. But there were also other factors that proved to be very important. This essay will attempt to assess the relative importance these factors.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin Dbq Research Paper

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There were several reasons. Stalin sought to reorganize the Soviet Union via his Five Year Plans, which called for a radical industrialization as well as collectivisation to increase agricultural production and efficiency. This increased agricultural output was necessary to support the rapid industrialization he espoused; how else could the workers be fed? Many peasants who had been awarded or taken their land...to liquidating the kulaks as a class" (Document 5.3 Collectivisation 181). Millions were sent to labor camps, deported and died. The impossible demands made on the peasant farmers of increased production, only to turn everything over to the state, resulted in peasants that remained on the land at first hiding, then burning their crops/killing their animals rather than give them up "Stock was slaughtered every night..." (History in Quotations #5). An infuriated Stalin sent industrial workers into the country to show the peasants 'Bolshevik firmness' "without any rotten liberalism...[or] bourgeois humanitarianism...[and with]extreme measures" to get the grain. (Document 5.4 Horror in the Village…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soviet Union DBQ

    • 840 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Stalin was a part of the Bolsheviks which was the communist party of the Soviet Union. The Kulaks were the wealthy landowners and they were capitalists and did not approve of Stalin’s beliefs and methods. One of the changes Stalin implemented in order to achieve his one of his many goals, was to collective farms. Collectivization is the act of seizing land from the wealthy (which in this case were the Kulaks) and using it for communal use. This means that the Kulaks’ farms would get broken up to little parts and given to the peasants. In document 4, an excerpt from a speech that Stalin delivered in 1929 he says, “The socialist way, which is to set up collective farms and state farms into large collective farms, technically and scientifically equipped, and to the squeezing out of the capitalist elements from agriculture.” Stalin was determined to remove any and all capitalist that were not in his favor. Another change Stalin implemented was to stop feeding the livestock with the wheat being grown. In document 5, there is a graph showing the declination of the livestock in the first and second five year plan. In a total of 10 years, the amount of livestock was virtually cut in half! In comparison, the wheat production increased significantly in the ten years in which the livestock was cut in half. The wheat being…

    • 840 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Collectivisation was the process by which Russian agriculture was reformed, small farm were merged into larger units, in hope of production becoming more efficient and increasing its output. Stalin was aware of the increasing possibility of a war with Germany and so self-efficiency in food production became more imminently important in order to survive a war against the western powers. From 1927-1929 harvests fell, simultaneously affecting the wider economy. The government needed to sell grain abroad so they could receive the foreign currency necessary for resources needed for industrialisation. Collectivisation was therefore introduced to increase efficiency and introduce mechanisation. This added urgency to a need to increase output meant that high targets were set which were met with incentives and also punishments, pushing the economy towards its maximum potential making the essential contribution to the transformation of the Russian economy.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The introduction of collectivization and industrialization by Stalin were both supposed to end ideological compromise and come closer to Marxist theory. However, many historians have made it clear that these policies created a socialist Soviet Economy which was the opposite of Marx’s theory. State control of the economy was a key feature of Stalin’s totalitarian rule.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The concept of Stalinism, being the ideologies and policies adopted by Stalin, including centralization, totalitarianism and communism, impacted, to an extent, on the soviet state until 1941. After competing with prominent Bolshevik party members Stalin emerged as the sole leader of the party in 1929. From this moment, Stalinism pervaded every level of society. Despite the hindrance caused by the bureaucracy, the impact of Stalinism was achieved through the implementation of collectivization and the 5-year plans, Stalin’s Political domination and Cultural influence, including the ‘Cult of the Personality’. This therefore depicts the influence of Stalinism over the Soviet State in the period up to 1941.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stalin and Purges

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The aim of this investigation is to assess how the purges of 1934-38 helped Stalin preserve his power in the Soviet Union. In order to evaluate this, the investigation assesses Stalin’s role in relation to the purges, as well as their purpose. An analysis of this should indicate the extent to which the purges were successful, and their contribution to Stalin’s power. In the section entitled Evaluation of Sources, two sources used for this investigation (The Great Terror: A Reassessment, and Origins of the great purges: the Soviet Communist Party reconsidered, 1933-1938) are evaluated according to their values, limitations, origins, and purposes.…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To what extent did Stalin transform the society and economy of the Soviet Union? (2006)…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This policy was known as collectivization and it changed agriculture completely by requiring farmers to use new machinery and to sell a portion of their outcome to the state at significantly low prices. The fact that farmers were not producing on their own individual farms and instead on collective farms where part of them went to the state showed a sense of ownership of the people. Stalin wanted to demonstrate his full extent of power by limiting the freedom of other, which contributes to an abuse of power, considering that people were being stripped of their basic…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stalinism: Tsarist Regime

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Stalinism could best be described as a state enforced revolution, one that was enforced by a party that had more control over daily life than even the autocratic Tsars (Skocpol 226). This is important to note, as Stalinism’s inclination towards totalitarianism, control over all aspects of life, would be a key point in its central theory. Totalitarian policies would lead however, to massive industrial successes, Stalin’s goal. Within the first Five Year Plan, Stalin’s policy of collectivization met with near total annihilation of the independent peasant, allowing the state to gain access to all the resources it needed to invest in heavy industry. Through these policies, heavy industry numbers flourished, with coal, oil, iron, and steel production doubling over the course of four years (Hoston Lecture Outline Week 9 “Stalinism and Forced Collectivization”). This came at the cost of the agricultural industry, which suffered immense shortages, however this was the intent of Stalinist policy. After all, it was through collectivization that Stalin justified the removal, essentially a pre-purge, of the entire “kulak” (rich peasant) class, who Stalin claimed held the revolution back (Skocpol 230). While this was not an entirely new belief, Engels would write in response to Tchakov’s pamphlet on Russian wealthy peasants as being bloodsuckers, it was an entirely new way of dealing with it (Engels, “On Social Relations in Russia” 672). No longer would revolution be coordinated through the people, the Soviets, or even collective leadership, it would be coordinated through the will of the Dictator, of…

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In order to contextualise the contemporary sources used in this enquiry, it has been necessary to consult secondary sources in order to provide the appropriate background. Here, the historian Michael Lynch maintains categorically that Stalin's economic policies did little to improve the life of the Russian people, giving them 'few benefits'. Taken from a book published after Gorbachev's 1985 Glasnost, a period of openness when the Soviet archives were opened up, Lynch would have been privy to vast amounts of evidence and statistics. Thus statements such as 'there is little evidence that they [Stalin's economic policies] provided the Soviet Union with the necessary capital growth' and 'there was never genuine…

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    FAIL: Grain harvest dropped dramatically in 1930s and didn’t recover until the latter half of the…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The End Condition Analysis

    • 1833 Words
    • 8 Pages

    On the other hand, detractors like Rosa Luxemburg and Aleksandra Kollontai believed while a central body of elites had its place in the movement, its sole role should be the nominal guidance of the overall working class: allowing the masses to work towards their ideal form of communism on local and regional levels, rather than dictating terms from the top down. Unfortunately, the centralists won the day in the Soviet Union, and the populace was subjugated to a strict, state interpretation of what communism was to be. In the short-run, the Soviet Union was able to make significant gains in terms of industry, military strength, and global prestige, but at the expense of the strength of its civil society –an issue that was only magnified when Stalin succeeded Lenin, and implemented a series of brutal purges that led to what Scott classified as a perfect set-up to the worst possible outcome of High Modernist thought. Collectivization of agricultural fields meant that individual rights were sidelined for overall productivity; designers aimed for simplicity in grouping these agricultural lands, and foresaw an increase in productivity that warranted relegating individuals as mere numbers. Reducing people into numbers is what allowed the authoritarian government to weather out the…

    • 1833 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Following Stalin's succession to power in 1929, once again, Russia was transformed. As part of Socialism in One Country, Stalin focussed his intentions internally. This involved the notorious industrialisation and collectivisation drives which were intended to reform the economy. Nevertheless, do so, Stalin realised he would have to create a more ordered and disciplined society. Consequently, as part of the Revolution from Above and what was deemed by Sheila Fitzpatrick as the "great retreat", where Stalin turned away from the policies of his predecessor, Stalin embarked on numerous social policies which focussed on the reforms of education and family life. Consequently, Stalin's legislation on the one hand, changed the lives of countless Soviet women and children. Nevertheless, it is also argued that his policies were no similar to previous social legislation under the Tsar and Lenin. Consequently the extent of change and the significance of Stalins policies remains in question.…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays