Even on the moon there is gravity. Who created gravity? If we did not have gravity would the human race even exist? Would Earth even exist? There is only one explanation, which would be, God. There is no greater or more intelligent being than God. Who else could create the solar system, something with that much detail and beauty?
Among all the other arguments this is the only one that makes perfect sense to me. The argument about miracles is silly. I am not one to believe in miracles. Yes, I believe in God, but I do not believe that “miracles” created the universe. I call them coincidences. Coincidences did not create the universe and the amazing function and structure of it.
Then there is the religious experience also known as the hallucination argument. This argument claims that people have had experiences with God and therefore there must be a God. How can this be true? Only certain people have “experienced God”. This argument will make it hard to convince another person that God exists. A person will more than likely not believe it unless they have an experience themselves.
I have always asked myself those questions, whether or not God, or a greater being, existed. When it is put into this design perspective it makes sense. Who created all these things? Who was smart (and powerful) enough to create all of these things and have them work together like a machine? It’s like the circle of life. This design argument combines all my questions into one and leaves me to believe that there is a God. There is no other answer.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
McCloskey makes the claim that he is reminding fellow atheist why they believe there is no God. He claims that the traditional proofs have no merit. I believe the sheer magnitude and complexity of the world we live in is strong evidence of an intelligent designer and creator. Only an intelligent creator could form a world where the air that we breathe is part of such a complex system. We also live in a world that has morals, which points to a morally perfect Being that we model our lives and society by. The Cosmological, Teleological and Moral arguments create a cumulative case for why God exist. God’s existence is not solely dependent on any one argument, rather an accumulation of several arguments. Although McCloskey tries to argue the Cosmological, Teleological and Moral arguments from the same point, they are intended to build upon each other.…
- 1378 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
One key feature of the design argument is the fact that it uses analogies in order to support and prove its conclusions. In all versions of the design argument the main idea is that because the world shows purpose god must exist, most philosophers who talk about the design argument use analogies in order to explain this idea. William Paley uses the watch and watch maker analogy in order to show this. Paley said that if we found a watch on a heath, we would assume that it has some designer as it clearly complex and built for a purpose, we could then therefore say the same of nature as everything in nature has a purpose for example trees having leaves to take energy for the sun to grow or predatory animals having sharp teeth to kill prey. Thomas Aquinas is another philosopher who used an analogy in order to show how god must exist as there is purpose in the world. Aquinas used the idea of a bow and arrow. He stated that when a bow is directed towards its purpose/target it is directed by an archer who is sending it in the right direction. Therefore, we can say that when we see things in nature which are moving towards are target they must also have some kind of driving force behind the directing them in the right way and that this force must be god. The use of analogies in the design argument makes it easier to follow and understand, however, the analogies have…
- 583 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
This view basically claims that God began the process of evolution within the context of created matter. Though God programmed the system, simple life forms were allowed to evolve into more complex life structures. During this entire process, God withdrew Himself from His creation, and allowed the ordained natural laws to guide the creative process. In this view, God is Creator of everything.…
- 1142 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Design Argument can be split into two sides: design qua purpose and design qua regularity. The key idea of design qua purpose comes from William Paley. He used analogy as the basis for his argument, noting how the complex design of a watch allows all the parts to work together perfectly to achieve its purpose. He then noted the complexity, order and purpose of the universe, stating that "every manifestation on design, which existed in the watch, exists in the works of nature." Therefore if a watch's intricacy stands as evidence that it has been designed, by analogy the universe must also have a designer and, as the designer is required to be supremely powerful, the designer must be God.…
- 1175 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
This particular argument is also in favor if the idea that God does in fact exist, but Aquinas has a different explanation from Anselm. Thomas Aquinas presents the argument known as the “Cosmological” or “first cause”. In a few words, this means that Aquinas believes there must have been a first cause in the world. Aquinas argues that the proof of Gods existence is based on the basis of experiences. God must exist because every being that is dependent for existence was caused by something else that happened prior to it. He believes either there is a boundless chain of contingent beings that is extending backwards or there is a first cause, something that was not caused by something else but began everything else. But in reality, there cannot be a continuous chain extending backwards. Therefore; there is a first cause, something that was not caused by anything else but started everything else that currently exists. Aquinas claims the existence of God can be proven in five ways: Argument from motion, Nature of efficient cause, possibility and necessity, gradation, and Governance of the world. Aquinas gives us an argument that is not hard to interpret. There must have been one who created mankind, constructing the world one being at a time. It is very easy to go along with the idea that there is one person or thing that created everything else. While this argument is clear and…
- 1416 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The cosmological argument proves the existence of God. It discusses contingent beings which exist, but could not have existed and necessary beings which exist and could not not exist. The cosmological says that there is a contingent being that exists. The existence of a contingent being must have a cause and the contingent being cannot be the cause of itself. The complete cause of a contingent being includes only other contingent beings or it includes a necessary being. Contingent beings alone cannot be the complete cause of a contingent being. The complete cause of a contingent being must include a necessary being. Therefore, a necessary being must exist. The cosmological argument shows that there must be a higher power, and that higher power is God. Everything that exists on earth is a contingent being. There is no person or animal that is not contingent. But what created everything to begin with if a contingent being cannot be the only cause of another contingent being? Everything on earth has a cause, but there must be a necessary being being that caused the Earth. There has to be something other than contingent beings. There has to be a necessary being that started everything. That necessary being is…
- 1190 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The example of the apple that was discussed in class is a good example of this claim. A person can understand that an apple contains seeds which can grow into an apple tree. The tree can then produce apples, continuing the cycle of causes for the creation of the apple. The fact that this cycle can be thought to go on for a long time, but the cause of the first apple had to start at some point. By this observation, a person can determine on their own that whatever created the first apple or apple seed is greater than what created it, what caused it is what is considered God.…
- 923 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The classic Design Argument claims that the universe has order, purpose and regularity and the complexity of the universe shows evidence of design. This leads to the conclusion that there is a designer of the universe who is said to be God.In Socrates' words: "With such signs of forethought in the design of living creatures,can you doubt they are the work of choice or design?"…
- 518 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Cosmological Argument for the existence of God is one of the most famous of all philosophical arguments that address the existence of a supernatural being who created the material universe. The supernatural being whom created the material universe is the logical core of what is commonly meant by the word God within the classic theistic religious traditions of Judaism, Islam, and Christianity with reasoning that constitutes a philosophical argument for the existence of God. Many cosmological questions on religion have intrigued human beings across all cultures since the beginning of recorded history and continue to interest us today. The Cosmological Argument is also known as the First Cause Proof that addresses that something must require a first cause to be brought into existence. Although many philosophers and people are skeptics of this theory based on the unbelief of God existence and logically thinking that God would need a cause to existence. The Cosmological Argument for the existence of God is not the strongest argument for religious groups to prove reason for the existence of God.…
- 2130 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The Teleological Argument recognizes the various complex aspects of the Earth, nature, and life and attributes these complexities to a designer. The most common analogy depicting this argument is described through a watch. A watch represents intricate and meticulous designing that couldn’t have just been formed accidentally. This analogy can be interpreted relating to the universe. The greater the design, the greater the designer. Much like the watch, there are various “natural” processes and events that happen in the world that could not have just happened coincidentally as it appears to have been the result of meticulous designing, there had to be someone or something that engineered it all and that being can be rationally reasoned to be God through the Teleological Argument as it implies intelligent design. There is no way that Earth is already fine-tuned to support the complexity of living organisms and life because there are so many qualities that characterize them; it had to be planned, intentional and caused by someone or…
- 1217 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The teleological argument, although it does face serious difficulties, seems to make the most sense and have more support than any of the other arguments. The ontological argument is too ambiguous in its first too premises and just doesn’t make any sense when pulled apart and evaluated. The cosmological argument seems to make some sense but it also seems to be a small piece of the teleological argument. The teleological argument suggests that there had to be a designer of all biological organisms because of their order and complexity. If there had to be a designer of…
- 751 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The teleological argument is based around the idea that the universe in some way demands the existence of an intelligent being that designed the universe to allow life. For example Thomas Aquinas included a form of the teleological argument as the fifth of his five ways. Aquinas presented his fifth ‘way’ to prove God exists and argues that nature seems to have an order and a purpose to it. Nothing inanimate can be of use unless there is someone or something to give it purpose, or a guiding hand as Aquinas stated it. Inanimate objects could not have ordered themselves – such as the planets – as they do not have the capacity or intelligence to do this. Therefore, someone with intelligence must have put them in order, which would be God.…
- 1485 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The design argument is also referred to at the Teleological Argument stemmed from the Greek work ‘Telos’ meaning end or purpose. It is an ‘A posterior’ argument (from experience) based on our empirical senses and it is synthetic meaning that it is from observation. The argument is also inductive meaning there a number of possible conclusions. The main basis of the Teleological argument is based on a designer commonly known as ‘the classical God of theism’ (hereafter referred to as God)…
- 3121 Words
- 13 Pages
Better Essays -
The argument for design has evolved over time as both theologians and philosophers have needed to adjust their arguments supporting this theory to address an ever changing landscape of scientific, biological and cosmological discovery. Despite this the essence of the argument remains intact those in support of the theory would argue that our existence on this earth and in this universe is far too complex a chain of events to have happened by chance. That in fact the existence of the universe is itself the result of a set of such improbable circumstances that there has to be intelligence behind its creation an architect, a creator or in religious terms a God (Chappell, 2011, p. 55). The versions of this argument are in my opinion interesting…
- 1633 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Douglas Gasking gave his arguments against the existence of God. Premise 1 of his argument looks fine. World is a greatest creation. If there is no world, then there is no human life. Premise 2 is also reasonable.…
- 434 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays