Preview

An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism (Peter Hall)

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6174 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism (Peter Hall)
Abstract: This chapter outlines the theoretical perspective behind a ‘varieties of capitalism' approach to comparative political economy, emphasizing the central role of the firm as the agent of economic adjustment and the impact of the relationships it forms in the spheres of corporate governance, labor relations, skill formation, inter-corporate relations, and employer–employee relations. It develops the distinction between liberal market economies, where firm endeavours are coordinated primarily by markets, and coordinated market economies, where coordination is more heavily strategic, and explores how the institutional complementarities in these economies give rise to distinctive forms of innovation as well as comparative institutional advantages that condition the response of firms and national governments both to globalization and to the dilemmas they face in the realms of economic and social policy-making.
Keywords: comparative institutional advantage, comparative political economy, coordination, economic adjustment, economic policy, globalization, institutional complementarities, skills, social policy, varieties of capitalism

1.1 Introduction
Political economists have always been interested in the differences in economic and political institutions that occur across countries. Some regard these differences as deviations from ‘best practice' that will dissolve as nations catch up to a technological or organizational leader. Others see them as the distillation of more durable historical choices for a specific kind of society, since economic institutions condition levels of social protection, the distribution of income, and the availability of collective goods—features of the social solidarity of a nation. In each case, comparative political economy revolves around the conceptual frameworks used to understand institutional variation across nations.
On such frameworks depend the answers to a range of important questions. Some are policy-related. What kind of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the book “The Mystery of Capital, Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else,” by Hernando De Soto argues that the institution of property is necessary for the market economy to function properly. De Soto believes that without formal property, no matter how hard they work; most people will not be able to make money in a capitalist society. In Chapter 3, De Soto identifies the six tasks that a formal system of property performs which are: property fixes the economic potential of assets; Integrating Dispersed Information into One System; Making People Accountable; Making Assets Fungible; Networking People; and Protecting Transaction (De Soto, 49-61). He claims that bringing the assets held by the world’s poor into formal…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It has come to my attention that during the late 1800’s there has been many industries that shaped the rules and regulations of our society today. There have been many names that these companies have been named but two of them really stand out to me. They are “Captains of Industry,” and “Robber Barons.” I firmly believe that these companies can be looked at as “Robber Barons” instead of “Captains of Industry” because these companies take advantage of their employees (including children), they leave the people powerless, and also, they eventually leave these poor citizens unemployed.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The rate of economic and political change in recent decades has been dramatic. The Anglo-Saxon emphasis on neo-liberal economic ideology has drifted East, with the (Brown, 2000) ‘rise of China’ and other emerging economies. The trend in recent decades has focussed on the need to privatise great swathes of the economy and to reduce trade barriers, leading to less protectionism. This emphasis on private sector control became apparent in the 1980’s with (Hutchinson, 2008) ‘Thatcherism’ and ‘Reaganism’ seeking to reform the post-War consensus. The dramatic changes in America and the United Kingdom were not restricted to those economies however. The European Union (Salmon et al, 1997) progressively looked to integrate politically and economically placing more emphasis on ‘free trade’ and market based solutions. The power of the Soviet Union was beginning to diminish, with the collapse of the Berlin Wall and in China (Ruan et al, 1995) Deng Xiaoping was moving the communist party of China towards considering economic reforms that would lead to a drift towards market based solutions away from the Centrally-planned ideology.…

    • 5138 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ipa Cheat Sheet

    • 2135 Words
    • 9 Pages

    AIPA 2: UNDERSTANDING ACTORS, INTERESTS & POWER Institutions  Basic level – states exist to provide (1) defence and (2) social order  this requires the presence of a functioning economy.  State not only produces, consumes and redistributes; it’s also the main source and enforcer of “rules of games”.  “Rules of games” are institutions  institutional quality is related to economic performance.  Evidence: No country has gotten rich with bad institutions. Politics  Politics is the process of creating new institutions. Existing institutions create a constraint on this process.  Political processes can be analysed in terms of Actors involved in the processes, their interests and their relative power (AIP).  Actors: Political, Societal(land, labour, capital, business associations, unions, students, military), International (hegemon, institutions)  Interests: Assume, Deduce or Judge by stated intention and observed behaviour.  Power: voter base, past performance, military control, resource control, shared nationalism/ethnicity, moral authority, int’l support  Usually, the actor with greatest relative power wins. IPA 3: STATE STRUCTURES 1: ENDS, DECISION-MAKING & IMPLEMENTATION Ends = the ultimate end of economic policy, not necessarily what is said.  Self-enrichment - “rentier state” e.g. Zaire, Congo. Anything possible for highest bidder.  Economic Development - “developmental state” e.g. Japan, S. Korea. Risk-sharing and high intervention with bias to domestic firms.  Equal outcomes - “welfare state” e.g. Scandinavia, Netherlands. Minor state intervention, heavily regulated, little adjustments & intervention.  Equal opportunity - “regulatory state” e.g. US, Hong Kong. Minor state intervention, light regulations & adjustments Decision-Making…

    • 2135 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I mostly agree with Jeff Miron’s revealing of these three myths about capitalism. As Miron discussed, pro-capitalism is mostly related and is benefited more by the consumers than the businesses. It is harder for the businesses to benefit as consumers do because as Miron explained, businesses are always going to have to compete against each other to win the consumer over. Therefore, consumers will have the advantage because a businesses’ goals are please their consumers. While most believe the myth that capitalism distributes income unfairly, I disagree because as Miron clarified, those who put more work in and are more productive will ultimately receive more in return than those who are inefficient and unsuccessful. I also agree that the recession…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capitalism is a hegemonic global, economic, and social order that increasingly shows a fatal contradiction between reality and reason, where it threatens human welfare as well as but also the continuation of most sensitive forms of life on the planet. Three critical crises make up the contemporary world condition originating from capitalist development: the emergence of global imperial instability associated with shifting world hegemony; the Great Financial Crisis and stagnation/depression; the growing threat of planetary ecological collapse.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theorists began to recognize capitalism as pre-industrial society developed economically and major social changes began to occur. Modernization resulted in industrialization, urbanization and bureaucratization as the workplace shifted from the home to the factory, people moved from farms into cities where jobs were more readily available and large-scale formal organizations emerged. Classical theorists’ observations addressed numerous facets of social organization and interaction that came about as a result of modernization; however this essay will focus on their ideas regarding capitalism and the capitalistic society. Over time, classical theories have been analyzed, debated and modified but sociologists continue to reference them as they have merit in understanding contemporary issues.…

    • 3246 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capitalism and Socialism are very different. Capitalism, for instance, is an economic system where the production of goods is regulated by the people as well as the selling of goods. People own most of the companies, not the government. Their market is reliant on supply and demand. This causes companies that are incompetent to go out of business, and efficient companies to prosper. It also offers the consumer a better quality good for the least amount of money. Socialism on the other hand, is very different. In a Socialist economy, the government owns most of the prosperous companies. The government then regulates how much of a product is produced, distributed and how much the good will cost the consumer.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the feudal system in Europe began crumbling with the dawn of the Industrial Revolution a void was created in the European social and economic structure, Scottish philosopher Adam Smith took it upon himself to fill this void and in 1776 published The Wealth of Nations; just as Newtons Principia Mathematica laid the foundation for modern physics so to did Adams work lay the foundation for modern economics. For the next 70 years Adams doctrine went unchallenged until Karl Marx presented his rebuttal in the Communist Manifesto.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capitalism And Socialism

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Capitalism and socialism are economic systems that both began in 1750. In my opinion, capitalism is a better system because it includes private property and capital accumulations. Capitalism affords economic freedom. It also affords consumer choice and economic growth. Capitalism and socialism are somewhat opposing schools of thought in economics. The central arguments in the socialism vs. capitalism debate are about economic equality and the role of government.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Capitalism In America

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Undeniably, capitalism is the most dynamic social and economic system ever found on earth. With its fundamental principles of individual rights, free market, and the ultimate purpose of profit seeking, the modern capitalism has created the most prosperous time ever known in human history. The recent history also witnesses that capitalism has transformed and built American into an economic superpower on earth. However, the intrinsic nature of capitalism is just like any kind of magic drug. The more powerful it is, the severer side effect it possesses. While the signs of affluence are almost everywhere in America, so are the economic inequalities, especially the evident disparities in the distribution of wealth and income. As a matter…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The future of our country is in a serious predicament; we have let a political…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    COMM 331

    • 2269 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Changes normally have an unexpected consequences and therefore the climate of change is remained increasing. Progressively, everyone is seeing the changes are in interests of corporations. Hence, the corporations are believed to be the ones which control the operation of the world, not governments. To figure out where the world is without depending on “capitalism” and “socialism”, it is to study how a practical political economy looks like. Since there is a dispute regarding the management of society, hard work is what we need to develop strategies for it.…

    • 2269 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Harman, Chris. 2004. The Rise of Capitalism. International Socialism Journal (Spring). http://pubs.socialistreviewindex.org.uk/isj102/harman.htm (accessed 14 April 2011).…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Mujo Kuje Konja Po Mjesecu

    • 2798 Words
    • 12 Pages

    HE DEBATE over the role of institutions in economic development has become dangerously simplified. The vague concept of “institutions” has become, almost tautologically, the intermediate target for all efforts to improve an economy. If an economy is malfunctioning, the reasoning goes, something must be wrong with its institutions. In fact, recent papers have argued that institutions explain nearly everything about a country’s level of economic development and that resource constraints, physical geography, economic policies, geopolitics, and other aspects of internal social structure, such as gender roles and inequalities between ethnic groups, have little or no effect. These papers have been written by such respected economists as Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, and James Robinson; Dani Rodrik, Arvind Subramanian, and Francesco Trebbi; and William Easterly and Ross Levine. Indeed, a single-factor explanation of something as important as economic development can be alluring, and the institutions-only argument has special allure for two additional reasons. First, it attributes high income levels in the United States, Europe, and Japan to allegedly superior social institutions; it even asserts that when incomes rise in other regions, they do so mainly because of the Western messages of freedom, property rights, and markets carried there by intrepid missionaries intent on economic development. Second, according to the argument, the rich world has little, if any, financial responsibility for the poor because development failures are the result of institutional failures and not of a lack of resources. The problem is that the evidence simply does not support those conclusions. Institutions may matter, but they don’t matter exclusively. The barriers to economic development in the poorest countries today are far more complex…

    • 2798 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays