Preview

An Indian's Looking Glass For The White Man Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
912 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
An Indian's Looking Glass For The White Man Analysis
William Apess, a Native American writer in the 1800s, wrote an essay called An Indian’s Looking Glass for the White Man. In this section, Apess speaks about how the Native Americans felt robbed of their life and were ruined as a race because of the colonist who came in and destroyed them. The whole section generally, is making the white men think about what it would be like to be a Native American at that time. He wanted the rights and justice for his race of people. Apess shows how what the white men did to the Indians was immoral and degrading of a race. This is seen throughout the passage with the many questions he poses that will make people think morally and logically about the situation of the colonist and Indians and he uses Christianity …show more content…
He proposes questions that are made to make people think about what is happened and if it is right or not. One of the best questions he mentions is, “I would ask you if you would like to be disfranchised from all your rights, merely because your skin is white, and no other crime?” (CR, 28). He is forcing the white people who are reading this to put themselves in the shoes of the Natives. Lawfully it is not right of what the happened to the Native Americans. They were stripped from their property because they were not of the European descendants. “With the proverbial shoe now firmly on the other foot, Apess proceeds to place Euro-Americans into the role American Indians had been forced to occupy.” (Danver, 2016). This is from an analysis of An Indians Looking Glass of the White Man and again here Danver is saying that Apess is making the white men think about the actions they pushed upon the Native Americans. This is intentionally setup this way to make the white men realize what they were doing was completely immoral and illegal is their system of law, but that did not make a difference. The colonist believed and were never told otherwise that they are the best race there is and all others are subject to them. This is not his biggest which involves the use of Christianity and …show more content…
The colonist where there also to convert people to Christianity, but their methods of doing so made the natives think that Christianity was a bad thing and that they should be afraid to join this religion. The quote that brings the most power showing this is, “Did you ever hear or read of Christ teaching his disciples that they ought to despise one because his skin was different from theirs?” (CR, 29). This quote brings light to the fact that they were not teaching natives the true Christianity, but an altered form that was favorable to the white men. There is also another part where he says that God would be disgracing himself by making fifteen different other races to live alongside his powerful white image. He notes this at the beginning of the essay by proposing the idea that Indian and white people are both children of god (Danver, 2016). Any another line of questions that connect the impracticality of the white men with Christianity, “But I would ask, how are you to love your neighbors as yourself?... Now to cheat them out of their rights is robbery. And I Ask, can you deny that you are robbing the Indians daily, and many others?” (CR, 31). He is showing how the colonist did not treat the natives with love or any care whatsoever, but instead with power and deterrence.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The main focus of Breen's essay the focus is on the fact that colonists in Virginia were driven and motivated to come to the New World, predominantly for monetary reasons. Virginia's soil was found to be unusually well suited for growing tobacco, which is why it drove such a variety of people to migrate there. The colonists, though said to be religious, were extremely individualistic, selfish, as well as primarily drawn in by the economic opportunity in Virginia. These attitudes and ideals are what consequently resulted in numerous military defeats and massacres. They avoided their military obligations, thus naming them the vulnerable "poorly defended white settlements." These settlements were very easy for the Indians to take advantage of, as Breen writes.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religious freedom was the driving force that led the first settlers that arrived on America’s shores in the 1500’s. They wanted to be free from the religious intolerance and forget the past. They were greeted by something that they couldn’t have expected in their wildest dreams, people living there already, and people that had lived on the land for centuries before. These Native Americans were not ready to assimilate and saw these settlers as gods, and began to worship them. The settlers believed that the natives were inferior to them due to their lack of technology, economy, and anything beyond a simple form of government. They used this to their advantage when they exploited the natives by trading unfairly.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter one shows how different cultures took advantage of not only African Americans, but Native Americans as well. Native Americans were invaded by Spanish settlers, taken into slavery and forced to live with harsh living conditions. Settlers exposed them to a vast number of diseases, and tricked other Native Americans into agreements, in which they were starved, made to live in the cold, and which ultimately led to the death of many of them. Native Americans were resistant to being overtaken and fought back to protect their people and their land. Spanish conquerors like Lucas Vasquez de Ayllon sent out to find laborers. He landed off the coast of South Carolina in hopes of finding a location to start a colony. During his search, he found that Europeans practiced Christianity and did not believe in exploiting their people. A groups resisted, they looked to other…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In fact, in both cases, we see a group of people, that used to be oppressed in the place they come from, emigrating to another land and subordinating the indigenous people. In the case of the Exodus, the emigrating people are the Israelites, and the oppressed of the oppressed are the Canaanites. In the American history, the emigrating people are the all the ones who left their countries in search of religious freedom, economic prosperity, etc., while the oppressed of the oppressed are the Native Americans. What Warrior explains is very clear and I completely agree with everything he states. As soon as I read it, the first thing that came to my mind was Delores Williams’s critique of James Cone’s reading of the bible. Williams basically makes the same arguments as Warrior, explaining that the Exodus should not be used as a liberating text because even though God frees the Jews from oppression, He ultimately oppresses the indigenous people of the Canaan. While Williams compares black women to the Canaanites, Warriors compares Native Americans to them. In the last sentence of the article, Warrior states, “Maybe, for once, we will just have to listen to ourselves, leaving the gods of this content’s real strangers to do battle among themselves.” I am not sure I am interpreting this right, but I think the author is saying that religions often provide grounds for people to oppress others. For this reason, we may “look elsewhere for our vision of justice, peace, and political sanity.” In other words, since throughout the course of history deities have been used to subordinate people, maybe it’s time to start using other sources to make justice emerge in the world. It seems a very strong statement from the standpoint of a theologian, but I might have misinterpreted…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When the Euro-Americans started to settle America they forced the Native Americans to adapt their culture and religion. The settlers were very serious about their Christian religion. They thought it was the one true faith and all people should believe in it. Euro-Americans actually feared the Native Americans because they felt that Native Americans were evil because they didn’t have a religion. What the Euro-Americans didn’t understand was that the Native Americans did have a religion and their own beliefs. Their religion and beliefs may have been very different from Christianity, but they did have one.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, Mr. Nash describes the effect the Native Americans had on the building of a new American culture. He says that the ones who were not killed by either disease, murder, or sold into slavery, were enveloped into the European society. As a result, we can assume that some Native Americans had to have taken part in the mixing of the Native American and European races. I believe this to be the first time that two major cultures had ever actually combined, either by marriage, slave rape, or adultery. This alone, the creating of a third race, is unique.…

    • 847 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If I were an Native American and I was faced with the disadvantages and unfairness they were treated with, I would be furious. I don't find it right that the white man can barge in,take all that rightfully belongs to them and end years of tradition and rituals to make them over into their idea of a “christian”. Reasons as to why I feel the way I do about the situation shall be displayed in the following paragraph.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    resulted in the death of so many colonists was the Gorilla warfare going on continuously…

    • 948 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    and unworthy of free will and rights. Christopher Columbus is a fine example, and one of…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The main question which the explorers of North America had in respect to the natives was if the Indians were able to understand the concept of Christianity and religion. The majority of the explorers placed the natives in a class subhuman to Europeans which deserved to be enslaved. Cabeza makes not…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cabeza De Vaca Analysis

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Spaniards were Christians…Ok??? I thought of them as devils. The book made Christianity seem tyrannical. When they tried introducing Christianity to the Indians, no, not introduce, force. The Spaniards just waltz in and throw Christianity in their faces. Once the Indians rejected the religion, those poor people were soon enslaved and murdered. They didn’t know what being a true Christian meant, all they knew was being one would lead to a massacre.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ||desiring to Christianize the Native Americans yet hoping to conquer them and steal their wealth.|…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Black Elk Speaks

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The book showed that the Indians' destiny was to roam through the world in would do anything to progress in the stages of life aiming for predominance over everything. This gives off the example of the white race over the Indians, not even in the way of whites wanting to destroy Indians, but the possessive feature of the whites wanting to expand to the territory that they believe is theirs. In analyzing the book, I would not say that the author was not persuasive; it was more of him not giving the straight facts that would induce us of real horror.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    American imperialists had convinced themselves that they had an obligation, referred to as the “White Man’s Burden,” to spread Christianity and elevate subject peoples while exploiting them economically.…

    • 994 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    While discussing this hypocrisy, Strehle writes, “American exceptionalism assumes that the chosen people and the God who chooses them are white; racist to its core, such an assumption camouflages prejudice under the guise of piety” (112). The first American settlers, believers in God and Christianity, embraced American exceptionalism by making decisions that benefited the selected but had no qualms about ostracizing those deemed as outsiders. To be “chosen” means to be specially selected. The exclusivity associated with this notion automatically divides people into two groups: chosen and not chosen. Those who are not chosen become inferior and do not benefit from the rules created by the chosen. The use of “assumption” represents the settlers’ justification of superiority without basing it on actual facts or evidence. Even though the lack of proof presents questions for many, the Christian settlers conveniently believe that God picked them over the others and, therefore, should reap the benefits from it. The images of “camouflage” and “guise” represent how the white settlers hide behind the veil of American exceptionalism to mask their greed and dishonest intentions. Finally, the notion of religion, Christianity, and God’s work allows the white settlers to use “piety,” a word usually associated with faith and loyalty, as…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays