An Experiment by Nancy Sommers on the Difference in Revision between Student Writers and Experienced Writers

Good Essays
Sommers says that the language students use to describe revision is about vocabulary, suggesting that they “understand the revision process as a rewording activity”.
How is that different from the way she argues that revision should be understood?

Nancy Sommers studies the problem of revision between students writers and more experienced writers. Those writers who are students focus more on the revision as fixing small errors and textual repetition, when more experienced writers focus on revision more generally, not only on the repetition of the words, but also on the repetition of the concept and ideas. This allows to the writers to do not get stack on superficial errors and let their ideas flow on the paper and to get across to the audience.

Nancy Sommers focuses on the importance of differentiating in revision between students and more advanced experienced writers. By doing a case study Nancy was able to study the problem. She proceeded by acquiring twenty freshmen students from Boston University and twenty more advanced adult journalists and overall academic writers in order to compare revision. With her experiment set, Sommers set out to discover the difference in interpretations of revision strategies between students and experienced adult writers. As Sommers explains, revising is the last step in the writing process, one that comes after both the first and second drafts. This means that revision comes only after having prewritten once, and written a paper twice. Because two drafts come before revision, revision can be interpreted as only small superficial mistakes, or more deep conceptual mistakes. With her experiment complete, Sommers had unveiled the mystery behind the interpretation of revision. Nancy Sommers discovered that to those writers who were students, revision simply meant going back and fixing small errors, such as repetition of words. This repetition does not include the repeating of ideas but only the repetition of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Born in Boston, Massachusetts, in 1924, Donald M. Murray taught writing for many years at the University of New Hampshire, his alma mater. He has served as an editor at Time magazine, and he won the Pulitzer Prize in 1954 for editorials that appeared in the Boston Globe. Murray’s published works include novels, short stories, poetry, and sourcebooks for teachers of writing, like A Writer Teaches Writing (1968), The Craft of Revision (1991), and Learning by Teaching (1982), in which he explores aspects of the writing process. Write to Learn, (6th ed,. 1998), a textbook for college composition courses, is based on Murray’s belief that writers learn to write by writing, by taking a piece of writing through the whole process, from invention to revision. In the following essay, first published in the Writer in October 1973 and later revised for this text, Murray discusses the importance of revision to the work of the writer. Most professional writers live by the maxim that “writing is rewriting.” And to rewrite or revise effectively, we need to become better readers of our own work, open to discovering new meanings, and sensitive to our use of language. Murray draws on the experiences of many writers to make a compelling argument for careful revising and editing.…

    • 2362 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    20110616163506944

    • 1634 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Because revising is the most important phase of the writing process, good writers can expect to spend most of their time in this phase.…

    • 1634 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I have learned that revising your writing makes it way better than before. You find your mistakes and realize you can replace words such as “bring to” to a different high vocabulary word such as “cease”. I know now that there is no way to make your paper perfect. There will always be a word, words, or sentence you could change.In addition, I’ve gained a better understanding on passive and active sentences. Once I was done writing my paper, and began to reread it I found some passive sentences. All I did was revise the sentence which helped my writing flow better. Initially, I read the first paper I wrote for the Quarter 1 Writing Assessment and I noticed that I didn’t follow the directions completely. As I read on, there were many simple sentences and not many transitional words.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    She comes to understand that it is with our daily lives that we begin to find ourselves and realize that our words not only the text matter. One has to give their own authority and their own standpoint to make their point argumentative. Through personal life, methods of teaching and college experience does Sommers truly notice the change between her own authority and textual information. It is within us that truly makes a paper what it is. Our own authority should be our judgment. Between the drafts makes one comprehend what really happens between 2 papers. Drafts not only have to be papers but they can pertain to our own lives as well. Arguments begin with our own voices. Either the risk one takes or the risk they do not. It is with much evidence and disdain that Sommers truly presents her argument. One is lost between the words of the paper to make it seem less effective. Sommers uses effective writing techniques’ and much revision to make her thesis…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The five steps of the writing process are equally vital to the succession of any writing assignment, whether it is for work or school. The five stages include PREWRITING, PLANNING, DRAFTING, REVISING, and PROOFREADING. As our text (Arlov, 2014), explains, “Writing is not a single act, but a process composed of several steps,” (p. 3). Moreover, constructing a strong paper that is well-written (no matter how tedious it seems), requires efficaciously executing all five phases. It is crucial not to take shortcuts by eluding any step of the writing process.…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Com 155 Week 2 Assignment

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Step three is revising. Revising allows the author to read what they have written again. It isn’t uncommon for the author to rearrange information, change or remove information to make their point clear; this helps their writing to be easier to understand.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * She writes that she “wanted to learn more about the planning & revising strategies of a highly skilled & verbal writer, to discover how these strategies could be most usefully analyzed, & to determine how an understanding of this writer’s processes would contribute to what we have already discovered about how skilled writers plan & revise”…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    After reading the article “The Composing Processes of Unskilled College Writers” by Sondra Perl I have been forced to understand how writers write. The writing process is a situation that is approached from various angles. In the writing process techniques and sequences from person to person are often diverse, but it is one of the ways one may be expressed. The goal of Perl study was to “see how unskilled writers write, can their writing process be analyzed in a systematic, replicable manner, and what does an increased understanding of their process suggest about nature of composing in general and the manner in which writing is taught in schools.” (191) With Perl performing this observation and collecting several amounts of data I decided to perform an observation on my writing by paying close attention to how I write. With analyzing I realized that my writing process have a very sequential pattern. I also have noticed that many acts of critical planning and editing are carried out through many of my writings and it has had a negative effect on the majority of my writing masterpieces. Subsequent to carefully critiquing my writing I have realized that all individuals have a different way they write.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The art of writing is a unique skill that requires the writer to have great flexibility and be open to improvement. Some may consider themselves a “perfect writer”, when in reality, no one is, and will ever be. Writing is a process that requires one to continuously build on skills learned in previous situations, applying new techniques and strategies to future writing projects. Different settings require different writing styles, and with that being said, one must be willing to change their writing skills to suit the requirements of their current setting. In the following essay I will reflect on past writing assignments, identifying my best and worst writing courses, strengths and weaknesses as a writer, and my opinion on why writing may or may not be beneficial to me throughout my career.…

    • 910 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During week six, learning team A continued their collaborative efforts in implementing and evaluating the quality improvement plan designed to assist each team member to enhance the quality of their individual assignments. This team utilized peer review, proofreading, and discussion as strategic tools to improve the quality of academic writing. This review will summarize the quality improvement process by critiquing team activities and identifying areas of team’s strength, weakness, and suggesting strategies for improvement.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They Say I Say

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nadell, J., Langan, J.,& Comodromos, E. A. (2011). “Talk About Editing”. In The Longman Writer (pg. 292-294). Pearson…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In doing so, Sommers supports her argument that the current revision process taught in schools, as part of a general, linear writing process, is failing to prepare students to be critical thinkers and to use their critical thinking skills to identify bigger issues in their writing and become good writers (Sommers 327). She argues that the reason for this failure is the perpetual view of writing as a comparison to oratory (Sommers 323). Hence, students focus too much on the actual words and not enough on what they want to do with the words; they worry about following the rules rather than getting their ideas across on paper (Sommers 326-327). Similarly, she argues that students believe the purpose of revision is to identify the technical mistakes within their papers; this perspective is distinct from experienced writers who view revision as a time to rethink their missions and the best ways to execute them in writing (Sommers 328). Sommers’ use of students’ perspectives on revision as compared to experienced writers’ perspectives is a clear example of how students are learning a fallacy in the classroom regarding their writing. They are learning that writing is founded on rules and teachers’ expectations rather than on their own opinions and…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard Marius Analysis

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During the course of students’ educational careers we come across many assignments that require us to write an essay on a specific topic in which we use different writing methods and steps to develop a completed paper. To help students with their writings, Richard Marius, a very educated and well known writer has written an article titled Writing Drafts in which he describes his own writing techniques that he uses to write an essay. In this essay I will compare and contrast the writing techniques of Richard Marius and the writing methods I use when I write an essay. Although Marius differs than I do in the way he prints out his drafts, we are similar…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “When students complete a first draft, they consider the job of writing done”. Generally this is what all students wish to happen. People wish they could just get things done the first time around. Unfortunately in the draft process readers have to proofread and modify their content for improvement and perfection. Leading to not just one but possibly many drafts written in order to meet perfection and/or satisfaction. In The Maker’s Eye by Donald Murray, he stresses the importance of revising your own essays. I agree with his reasoning because of criticism, audiences, and voice.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In chapter six of Strategic Writing Deborah Dean honestly admits the difficulty of teaching students the importance of revision. Dean concedes that, “most [students] resist revision” (148). It’s difficult for to students to view their writing from another perspective (Dean, 148). Revision often isn’t viewed as an opportunity to improve, but as a mindless writing chore you have to go through at school (Dean, 148). Peer review has failed many students when it comes to improving their writing (Dean, 162). Instead of only getting another’s perspective, we need to teach students strategies that they can apply to analyzing writing to determine effectiveness (Dean, 163).…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays