Preview

An Animal's Place Pollan Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
592 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
An Animal's Place Pollan Summary
In “An Animal’s Place” Michael Pollan (2002) talks about how he is reading “Animal Liberation” while eating a steak at a restaurant. He then starts to talk about the book and how it talks about giving animals civil rights. He then talks about the people who believe in the civil rights movement for animals and how England has changed their Constitution in order to protect animals. The European and Swiss are trying to also protect the rights of animals. Pollan talks about America still seeing animals as “things” (p.399) but we are changing some of our animal slaughter habits. He also talks about how confused we are and how the animal situation is just irrelevant. He talks about being more and more disconnected with animals and how we either look away from animal cruelty or become vegetarian. …show more content…
The author tries to go against what the author of the book says. He doesn’t believe animals should have moral consideration. He talks about doing research in order to refute what the author had to say. He then asks himself if they do have moral consideration then why are we still eating them. He goes on and talks about the difference in pain between human and animal. He then talks about how they treat animals in slaughterhouses but then goes on to talk about a farm he went to. He notices that the animals live their lives happy and are still killed for food. He likes the idea of this type of farm. He talks about we can’t just be vegetarian instead we should open our eyes and look at how are meat is killed. He also suggest that when we eat animals to give them the “respect they deserve”

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    This conversation happened between Jonathan Safran Foer and Jeffrey Goldberg. In the conversation Jonathan Safran Foer express his idea about saving animals by answering Jeffrey Goldberg’s questions. He believes that being a vegetarian could decrease the number of animals which are suffering modern breeding. Moreover, he uses examples to make people stop eating animals, such as, there are only 67 inches square for each chicken. For the question about why Jonathan Safran Foer does not care about human’ suffering rather to care about animals, Jonathan thinks that caring is not a finite…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    I believe he wrote the article so his readers would consider the ethics of what they eat. That is how the article impacted me . However, I have a problem with the article due to a bulk of the arguments against eating meat also applying to plants. As humans, we're required to eat at least one of them. However, ethics do play a role, in that morals is one of the elements that separates us from other animals. I believe that if you kill an animal or plant for food, you should put a majority of it to use in some way. I also believe animals and plants that are grown as a source of food should have as little interaction with humans as possible. Animals and plants should not be eaten if by eating them, we are endangering their existence. As long as animal or plant does not fall into one of these exceptions, then I believe it is ethically permissible to eat…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jeremy Rifkin 's article, “A Change of Heart About Animals” argues that animals are more like humans than we imagine and as a result should be treated with the care that they deserve. Rifkin develops and supports his argument using facts about the animals and these facts end up touching hearts. In order for Rifkin to get his point across he uses a smart technique by using pathos and plays with the emotions of his audience. Rifkin loves animals and his passion and love evokes emotions that the audience can feel. Animals can feel and have emotions similar to ours. in agreement with Rifkin, I argue that it is wrong and inhumane to kill or abuse animals because they feel, they deserve to have space and should be valued as much as humans are It is wrong no animal should be killed due to abuse or testing, it is wrong and inhumane.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Regan begins the essay by stating that “. . . few people regard the animal rights position as…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Jeremy Rifkin. “A Change of Heart about Animals.” The Mirror Company: Los Angeles Times, Page 15.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tom Regan's Position

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An Argumentative essay that looks at and breaks down the philosophical difference between Tom Regan’s position on Animal rights and, Peter Singer’s position on Animal liberation as a basis for better treatment of animals.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phil. outline

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    B. Singer then turns to the substantive issue of “what are the implications of utilitarianism for our treatment of animals?”…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In "The Case for Animal Rights," Tom Regan writes about his beliefs regarding animal rights. Regan states the animal rights movement is committed to a number of goals, including: "the total abolition of the use of animals in science; the total dissolution of commercial animal agriculture; and the total elimination of commercial and sport hunting and trapping. Regan goes on and tells us the "fundamental wrong is the system that allows us to view animals as our resources, here for us--to be eaten, or surgically manipulated, or exploited for sport or money." Once people accept this view of animals being here for our resources, they believe what harms the animal doesn't really matter. Regan explains that in order to have this changed, people must change their beliefs. If enough people, especially people that hold a public office, change their beliefs, there can be laws made to protect the rights of animals.…

    • 684 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If you want to carry out a morally just life, one devoid of unethical choices, you should refrain from eating other living beings” (McGuiness). Regan’s stance on animal farms is better for the animals but, doesn’t take in account the effect animals have on the grain production of a farm. There are many different purposes animals serve on a farm which help the community as a whole, but Regan wouldn’t agree with using the animals to promote happiness because it makes the animals merely as a means. Again Singer’s theory is more flexible than Regan’s which can make appealing to people concerned with various animal right ideals.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing Satire

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Animal rights are rights that affect all of us on a daily basis whether we realize it or not. From protecting the animals themselves from inhumane testing and living situations to climate change, the rights of animals are highly debated and are very controversial. People who are passionate about animal rights are typically vegan meaning that they do not consume and typically avoid products made by or with animal products of all sorts. This lifestyle choice is becoming more popular thus making it much easier to abide by. On the other hand, there are many people who still live by the much more primitive means of hunting. Some of these people believe humans are the top of the food chain and that humans have natural…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trust is one of the most essential feeling that anyone would want in themselves, and in other. Trust gives us the confident to support one’s point of view, and believes. There is no doubt that we can perfectly relate this to Michael Pollan’s essay “An Animal Place”. Pollan addresses the animal rightist claim that animals should be giving more rights, while other think that animals do disserve to have right since they are less intelligent than us humans. Pollan’s main objective is not to persuade his audience to stop eating meat, but rather to study the ethics of eating animals and to find out the way meat is processed by building a sense of trust with his audience. He effectively abutment his main opinion about the problem in the industrialized…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals Vs Vegetarianism

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The processed meat industry is an 800 billion dollar industry killing over 10 billion animals each in the United State alone. Factory farmed livestock account for over 99% of all the meat consumed by Americans even though they are raised in these despicable conditions. Many animals raised on factory farms live in abhorrent conditions where they are unable to turn around in their own cages, live in their own feces, and never even see the light of day.. Peter Singer dives into the idea that all animals are equal in a selection taken out of his book Animal Liberation, found in James and Stuart Rachels’ The Right Thing To Do, and advocates for the humane treatment of animals. Singer lays out the argument that it is morally wrong to make animals…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article, “An Animal’s Place” Michael Pollan explains to the reader that people should eat animals as long as they give them the respect animals deserve when they have life. Initially, Pollan agrees with a book that he is reading called, “Animal Liberation” which talks about moral consideration for animals. Pollan feels humans and animals have a built a mutual relationship, because humans take care of the animals then the animals feed humans. The author argues even though, animals and humans have a mutual relationship humans should have a respect for the animals. However pollan argues, humans are the only ones benefitting because, the animal suffers while the human life happy. Pollan uses a term called specists to describe people that…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Speciesism Analysis

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page

    The lecturer addressed the relevance of “speciesism” in vegan/vegetarian activism. Speciesism qualifies as non-sense as it does not compare with other forms of discrimination within our own such as homophobia, racism or sexism. Since non-human animals are inarguably different from us, they are inevitably subject to some form of prejudice. Although Ms. Khouri thinks that giving non-human animals the same rights as humans would…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Vegetarianism In America

    • 1950 Words
    • 8 Pages

    For one, by not purchasing animals products, the buyer isn’t participating in the torture that almost all farm animals endure. Meat eaters like to use the excuse that since they don’t kill the animals themselves, then they don’t have any part in how they are treated; however, that is far from the truth. Animals continue to be treated as they are and be sold in our grocery stores because the demand is still high, regardless of how the meat came from the animal and ended up in the store. As of 2008, The New York Times reported that Americans alone grow and kill around 10 billion animals a year (Bittman, “Rethinking the Meat-Guzzler”). That is due to a higher demand and consumption of the product. Yet, it’s still important to wonder if these people know how their eating choices are affecting the world in a broader perspective. A 2007 study conducted in Japan by the National Institution of Livestock and Grassland Science reported that approximately 2.2 pounds of beef equated to the same amount of carbon dioxide emitted by a car that travels 155 miles (Bittman, “Rethinking the Meat-Guzzler”). Not only that, but it also burns the same amount of energy required to light a 100-watt bulb for 20 days (Bittman, “Rethinking the Meat-Guzzler”). By avoiding meat, vegetarians are contributing in the act to lessen land and water…

    • 1950 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays