Preview

An Alternate Future Analysis Of The Battle Of Hastings

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
684 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
An Alternate Future Analysis Of The Battle Of Hastings
Battle and Alternate Future Analysis of the Battle of Hastings
The Saxons saw the return of Halley’s Comet in 1066 as a perilous omen for the future of England and the newly crowned King Harold prayed that it did not foreshadow things to come. While King Harold prayed over Halley’s Comet, the Duke of Normandy, William the Bastard, prepared his army for an attack to claim the crown from King Harold, which William believed, was rightfully his. At the time, King Harold had no idea that his greatest fears would come to fruition, nor fathom that he would be the last Saxon King to rule England. The Battle of Hastings fought on October 14, 1066, between the Normans and Saxons would incredibly change the course of history for the Normans, but for the history and culture of England as well. This paper will contain an analysis of the Battle of Hastings in order to assess an alternate outcome based on the lack of intelligence used, how certain intelligence techniques could have benefited the English, and what that alternate future may …show more content…
When Edward died in January of 1066, the English council crowned Harold Godwinsson, Edward’s brother-in-law, King of England (Weir 2001). After the death of Edward, there were two individuals vying to take England as their own; William, the Duke of Normandy, and Harald Hardrada, the Norwegian King who wished to reclaim Northumbria (Ibeji 2011). Harald Hardrada and Tostig, the brother of King Harold, attacked Northumbria on September 20, 1066, and fought with the forces of Earls Edwin and Morcar. The Earls’ forces could not hold off the Norwegians so King Harold gathered up his forces and marched 180 miles to Stamford Bridge to face the Norwegians on September 25, 1066. King Harold and his men defeated Harald Hardrada and his brother Tostig, but his men were severely tired and
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Battle Analysis: The Battle Of Cowpens
    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Battle Analysis: The Battle Of Cowpens

    In January the 17th of 1781 while Tarleton's men (Britain) attacked, Morgan (Colonies) instructed the militia to skirmish with Tarleton's men but to leave the front line open after firing a few rounds. The british mistook the repositioning of the Colonies as a rout and ran into an unexpected volley of aiming rifle fire with a cavalry charge and the militia showing up. The Tarleton escaped but Morgan's troops destroyed his army. In the end more than 800 of britain's troops were either captured or killed. The Americans suffered about 100 casualties in their first patriot victory to show they could outfight a similar british army without any other factors…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analysis Of The Battle Of Chelsea Creek
    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page

    Analysis Of The Battle Of Chelsea Creek

    The battle of Chelsea Creek, was a duel dispute, on May 27, 1775. This battle was between two opposing sides, in Suffolk County, Massachusetts. The 13 colonies in North America & the Kingdom of Great Britain. Leaders of the opposing forces were, John Stalk & Israel Putnam, American Colonists. Samuel Graves & Thomas Graves, British forces. American Militiamen, started this duel by, attacking Chelsea for, burning hay, animal needs, & any other thing they needed to be provided by. This lead to, the triumph for the American's &…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Bayeux Tapestry
    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Bayeux Tapestry

    I was just writing you to let you know that we will be able to come home soon because the Battle of Hastings is over and the enemy is retreating. The battle was called the Battle of Hasting because it was fought in Hastings, England. As a Norman soldier the Battle of Hastings was one of the most successful and memorable battles that I ever participated in. Duke William has always had a reputation of being a success on the battle field, but this victory has branded him as a victorious military leader. Harold the king of England at the time of the battle had murdered his brother and his kingship was disputed. As we all know the throne should have been Williams Duke of Normandy but that Harold cheated his way into it. Duke William had prepared for a battle with Harold months in advanced. The whole dispute started after the death of King Edward. King Edward died on January 5, 1066 and he didn’t have an official heir to his throne. The day after King Edwards death, Harold self-proclaimed himself the king of England illegally and took the throne as Harold the second. Once Duke William heard this new it outraged him and he began gathering his army and went to seek the approval of the pope to become England’s new king.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    How Edward Dealt with the Problems He Faced in the First Part of His Reighn 1042-1053
    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How Edward Dealt with the Problems He Faced in the First Part of His Reighn 1042-1053

    When Edward came into power in 1042, England was in a poor state financially and also because of threats of an invasion and this made the first few years of his rule difficult. Edward was faced with many problems which he had to overcome. These problems involved; powerful Earls, (especially the Godwine’s), the foreign policy and the domestic policy. Edward both failed and succeeded in these problems due to a number of factors. These include a lack of knowledge about his kingdom and some may argue that he was naïve in his decisions. With some evaluation, we will be able to judge if Edward was a successful King or not.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Was Henry Viii's Rule
    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    What Was Henry Viii's Rule

    The successes of Henry VIII can be seen in his ability to keep and gain power and the force of his military efforts.To determine if Henry’s rule was a success, we must define what success means in the context of a ruler. This argument identifies the goals set forth by Henry, and his ability to achieve these goals. It’s also worthwhile to note the state and legacy that his rule left upon England. The reasons we can call Henry VIII’s reign a success will be laid out in his personal, political, religious and military accomplishments while on the throne. Henry’s reign can be defined by his ability to indulge in his desires. Whether that was to take and hold power, spend money on luxuries and war, or to consume more food in his later years. He had a number of personal desires beyond living a life of luxury, namely to have an male heir to the throne. Despite troubling history of marriage, he was successful in not only producing one heir, but three: Edward VI, Mary I, and Elizabeth I.Henry was successful in using fear to make those seeking to undermine think…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why did William the Conqueror win the battle of Hastings
    • 676 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why did William the Conqueror win the battle of Hastings

    The Battle of Hastings was fought on 14th October 1066 - between Harold Godwinson of England and William of Normandy. The conflict started because when King Edward died, he left no heir to inherit the crown, which left three men claiming to be the next King of England. These three contenders to the throne were Harold Godwinson who was the only Englishman and related to the old king by marriage, Harald Hadrada and William the Conqueror who was the only contender that was related to King Edward by blood.…

    • 676 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wulf the saxon
    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Wulf the saxon

    The author, G.A. Henty’s, view of the middle ages and the Norman conquest is that many people believed that violence and killing could solve all of their problems, however the minority, people such as Wulf, the main character, and Harold Godwin king of England, knew that many things could be solved using intelligence - such as when Wulf devised a plan for him and his fellow thane Beorn to attack and capture the welsh castle of Porthwyn in chapter 10 (or X in roman numerals as it is written as in the book’s contents and chapter pages).…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Did William Win the Battle of Hastings?
    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why Did William Win the Battle of Hastings?

    Luck and timing were central to William’s success at Hastings. Firstly, in advance of the campaign, two of William’s rivals had died; Henry, king of France and Count Fulk of Anjou. This was very significant to the campaign because it enabled William to leave Normandy feeling safe because his two main adversaries were dead, and permitted him to get to Hastings without agonizing over an invasion and to dedicate his full thought to the campaign which lay ahead. When he did embark on the campaign, the weather was in the favour of the Normans. Initially, William had intended to embark in July but owing to adverse winds, the invasion was delayed from the end of July to September; first at the River Dives and then at St. Valery on the Somme. Additionally the Navy were no longer at seas as only remained on the Seas until the 8th September. With the amalgamation of clear seas and good weather on the 28th September, the day of crossing, The Saxons crossed the channel in just over 24 hours. Moreover, unbeknownst to William, this also was an extremely auspicious time for him because if he had arrived at his intended time of crossing in July, Harold and the Saxon army would have been waiting for him. However, it was a time of unease for Harold that year, as it was apparent that England was going to be invaded by either a Norman or a Scandinavian Force, and so Harold was nervous throughout the entirety of his nine month rain. Harold, thinking that he could be ubiquitous, had troops both at the North and at the South, waiting in vain for these invasions; however this only tired out his troops and stretched his resources. The Scandinavians arrived first, and so Harold made the southern fyrd march north to fight the Vikings. The battles of Gate Fulford, led by Edwin and Morcar, and the Battle of Stanford Bridge, were both won by the Saxons, boosting their morale but nonetheless they suffered great losses and the troops were tired where…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Henry Viii Pursuit Of Glory
    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Henry Viii Pursuit Of Glory

    The pursuit of glory and honour outweighed the security of England in deciding Henrician foreign policy. Although Henry’s foreign policy in this period was greatly influenced by his desire for security, both personal and national, there is much historiographical debate as to whether it was the primary motive of his actions abroad. In this essay glory and honour will be dealt with together, although glory tends to be associated with wartime victory, whereas honour is related to the upholding of status and in particular the dignity of Henry VIII - together both of these contribute to the overall prestigious nature of a monarch and are associated heavily with one another in a late Medieval context. Whilst security was consistent with the desires…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    An Inequitable Battle Of The Loyalists
    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    An Inequitable Battle Of The Loyalists

    After reading about the Loyalist by Loyalists themselves I figured it was an inequitable battle between the Loyalist and the American people. The Loyalist had to fight against the Patriots on American territory. Also, the Loyalist had limited help because the British army wasn't always around to help out. The Loyalist was tortured and killed, they were hung, tarred, feathered, whipped, and etc. The Patriots didn't care if you are a politician or a regular person the price for betraying your country were endless. It's gotten so debauched that people had to live on the street because the Patriots burn their house and had their land taken away. If the Loyalist didn't have to go through so much torment a lot more people would have joined the…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    1066: Year of the Conquest
    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1066: Year of the Conquest

    1066: The Year of the Conquest, written by David Howarth, tells of one of the most important dates in the history of England. In 1066, William the Conqueror and William of Orange fought the historical Battle of Hastings. The outcome of this battle lead to many changes to the English people. The Norman people became assimilated into the English way of life. Howarth proceeds to tell the tale of the Battle of Hastings through the eyes on a common Englishman.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Year Of The Conquest Analysis
    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Year Of The Conquest Analysis

    While I was reading 1066 I learned a lot about the history of England and how the Battle of Hastings nearly destroyed it, but the English refused to let their country die. Some of the events of that year are still being debated over but there is no way to know exactly how the events played…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Battle Of Waterloo Analysis
    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Battle Of Waterloo Analysis

    Understanding the Battle of Waterloo is important to know, because it shows that bad decision making and bad intelligence reporting can lead to one's defeat. Since 1804, Napoleon was trying to create his own empire over Europe. He was defeated in 1805 by the British, but he continued to move forward across Europe before being forced to surrender. He returned to Paris in March 1815, prompting Britain, Prussia, Russia and Austria to declare war. Napoleon invaded Belgium in June, attempting to take over Brussels. He sent his men to engage Wellington, also sending a battalion against General Blucher's Prussian army. Blucher decided to retreat as Wellington's army wasn't holding the front line against Napoleon's army. A decisive battle is now set…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Battle Of Atlantic
    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Battle Of Atlantic

    The Battle of Atlantic was the longest and largest sea battle during World War II. World War II began on September 3rd 1939, two days after German forces stormed into Poland. The Battle of the Atlantic began shortly after the declaration of War, but there is no official date of commencement. The Battle did not end until the defeat of Germany in May of 1945. The Battle was between the Allied powers, Great Britain, Canada and the United States, and the Axis powers, Germany and Italy. Both forces were looking to take control over the Atlantic, as this would give the winning force control over the sea routes. The Allies wanted to keep these routes open to allow supplies and reinforcements to reach the frontlines and the Axis wanted to shut down…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Gettysburg Battle Analysis
    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Gettysburg Battle Analysis

    In the beginning of June, 1863, the Confederate army began movement into Pennsylvania. Lee issued his first orders for the northern offensive on June 3rd, “breaking contact with Hooker’s Army of the Potomac near Fredericksburg” (Reardon, 2013). Lee’s forces moved through the Shenandoah Valley, using the Blue Ridge Mountains to conceal their movement into Pennsylvania. Lee used his cavalry Division, led by Maj. Gen. J.E.B. Stuart to screen the movement of the rest of the army as it passed over the Blue Ridge Mountains. After crossing the mountains, Gen. Lee ordered to clear the Shenandoah Valley of Union troops, providing a clear path into Pennsylvania. The screening provided by the cavalry was successful, and Gen. Hooker lost contact with the…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics