Preview

American Government

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
454 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
American Government
It is clear to all of us, that the Articles of Confederation did not create a strong enough government to keep us unified and protected. Thus, the Constitution has been created to make sure a proper government is set-up and that our rights are secured. Although the concerns of Anti-Federalists’ are understood, I agree fully with the Federalist’s proposed structure of government. It covers the basic rights instituted in the Declaration of Independence, and creates a centralized government that will help serve and protect the country while maintaining power among the people.
Anti-Federalists’ are worried that the government will find a way, over time, to take more and more power until they became an aristocracy. A more decentralized government with the states being supreme is being proposed by the Anti-Federalists’ in order to prevent this possible power consolidation. In addition, they find the bill of rights to be a need in order to prevent the government from trying to violate the rights of the people. As is said by Brutus I, “It might be here shewn, that the power in the federal legislative, to raise and support armies at pleasure, as well in peace as in war, and their controul over the militia, tend, not only to a consolidation of the government, but the destruction of liberty.”
The proposed plan by the Federalist’s is based upon a strong centralized government with a bicameral legislature controlled by using the checks and balances system between the branches. As was said in Federalist No. 51, “In republican government, the legislative authority necessarily predominates,” which would be Congress since it is the house with the most power because it represents the people’s will most closely. But by having Congress divided into two houses where both parts have representatives from all states, there is some degree of protection against Congress taking too much power. The government is also limited so that people’s rights are not imposed upon in any way.
I

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    U.S. Government

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Describe how the U.S. Constitution was formed. Use historical dates and references in your answer.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalist and Antifederalist had different ideas and beliefs of the nation’s government. Antifederalist believed in more power for the states and did not agree with a strong central government. They preferred the Articles of Confederation. Antifederalist did not want to ratify the Constitution due the fact there was no bill of rights and there was too much power in the national Constitution and not the States. On the other hand, Federalist believed in a more centralized national government. Federalist propose the separation of powers, which the act of vesting the legislative, executive, and judicial powers of government in separate bodies.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Government

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Federalist number 70 quote says “All men of sense will agree in the necessity of an energetic executive … The ingredients which constitute energy in the executive are unity; duration; an adequate provision for its support; and competent powers.” Which means that the anti-federalists wanted to prevent what was people’s rights being taken by groups of special interests. Another problem with the federalists is that they didn’t want the states to have the right to secede.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the greatest fears of the Anti-Federalists was that the Constitution had no Bill of Rights. The Anti-Federalist believed that the Constitution needed to have something in place to prevent the government from encroaching on the people’s rights and liberties. They felt by having a Bill of Rights the power could remain with the states and the…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The writing of the U.S Constitution generated many concerns over the amount of power to be allowed in the Federal Government. Political parties of Federalists and Antifederalists formed, sparking debate over the issue. As Federalists supported the proposed U.S Constitution, Antifederalists supported the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. Federalists felt that a strong central government would give protection to public and private credit. Many large landowners, judges, lawyers, leading clergymen, political figures, and merchants were in favor of ratifying the U.S Constitution. James Madison writes in Federalist Papers #10, “Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith and public of personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable” (Doc. A). Congressmen such as Madison strongly supported a stronger Federal Government. The existing government under the Articles of Confederation needed to be altered to ensure more control over the states. Federalists believed that if change wasn’t made the nation would fail. “Either the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “In The Federalist No. 51...James Madison wrote in defense of a proposed national constitution that would establish a structure of checks and balances between the different departments of the government and, as a result, constrain the government’s oppression of the public” (R. Higgs). James Madison advocated for a strong federal government rather than weak government with a strong state government. A strong federal allowed the states to be united with the sacrifice of being government by a powerful few. Anti federalists argued this was similar to the monarchy they had just escaped. Federalists also wanted to ratify the Constitution to protect the rights of the people by constraining the powers of each of the government branches. (Levine and…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    American federalism offers a solution to fears that the people will only be ruled by majorities from different regions that contained different interests and values. In the past America was run by the Articles of Confederation but it was not strong enough to hold the nation together. Under the loose Articles of Confederation, the national and state government was unable to maintain order. After the Revolution, Americans mounted debt from purchasing goods from other countries. To solve this problem the states would tax their citizens and this caused many people to go into bankruptcy. When Shay’s Rebellion happened people started realizing that by having a less powerful national government, it created many problems within the states and it also demonstrated the importance to maintain domestic order. The framers of the constitution created a federal government that replaced the weak confederation with a more powerful national government.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Government in America

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ch 9 Study Guide 1. The three elements needed for success in the nomination game. a. b. c.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Anti-Federalists believed that a strong state government was needed because if you have a strong central government than the people’s rights will not be ensured. (Doc. 4) Patrick Henry opposed the ratification of The Constitution because he believed that without it containing the Bill of Rights it would not allow the people have their natural rights. Anti-Federalist didn’t want to have a stronger national government because it could destroy the liberties of America that have been won during the Revolutionary…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During the period between its proposal in September 1787 and ratification in 1789, the United States Constitution was the subject of numerous debates. The contending groups consisted of Federalists, those who supported ratification, and Anti-Federalists, those opposed to the constitution. Each group published a series of letters known as the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers. The Anti-Federalist papers objected to provisions of the proposed constitution while the Federalist Papers defended the rationale behind the document. Anti-Federalist objections included that; the United States was too extensive to be governed by a republic, the constitution included no bill of rights, and the federal judiciary was vaguely defined and could become too powerful. Each of these arguments is worthy of attention as an examination of the debate between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists over the proposed Constitution.…

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti-Federalist felt that the Constitution gave more power to central government and less to the states. Anti-federalist saw the constitution as a sinister plot by an Elite leader; “to lord it over to the rest of their fellow citizens, to trample the poorer part of the people under their feet that they may be rendered their servants as slaves.” They also argued that the constitution would become to tyrannical because the central government wouldn’t be able to run all states as a result of being too distant and removed from interest of common citizens and farmers.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the year 1787, early America, officials and delegates came together to form a constitution that would restore the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was the attempt at creating a government for the newly independent America. But, it soon became clear that the document was not strong enough to govern America. Therefore, delegates who came to be known as Federalists and Anti-Federalists issued major arguments on the ratification of the U.S Constitution. Federalists were individuals who wished to unify the 13 states in negotiation, and anti-federalists were individuals who wanted a weaker central government. George Washington and the federalists argued that a stronger central government would accommodate everyone including farmers and merchants. Meanwhile, the leader of the anti-Federalists, Patrick Henry, reasoned that the development of this constitution may threaten the rights of people in the states. While the federalists and anti-federalists were arguing over how much power the government should hold, they eventually made compromises and ratified the U.S. Constitution. With these compromises the delegated created a constitution that still governs us to this day.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This allows the power of making decisions to be split up between the central government and state governments. The central government deals with foreign affairs, the military, and our economy. The state government deals with things such as school, roads,and everyday affairs. Then, they come together and have jobs they both can do. In short, "the different governments will each control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself," (James Madison, Federalist Paper #51, 1788). Federalism protects against tyranny because it does not allow one government to have too much power. The central government and state government have enough power to make important decisions, yet not enough to have total control. They rule over each other while being able to rule over themselves. It's written in such a brilliant manner where everything is…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Constitution proposed by the Federal Convention in 1787 provided the basis for a strong national government. Elections to the House of Representatives were by the people directly, not the states, and the federal powers over taxes and the raising of armies were completely independent of the state governments. (pp. 71,73) This new form of federalism essentially produced a new form of republicanism, the large republic. James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, in writing the Federalist Papers, provide the strongest arguments in support of it. Federalist No. 10 justified the new form of republicanism, not only as the price of union but also as the republican remedy to the disease of majority faction, or majority tyranny. (pp. 85-86) Because the Federalists saw a major danger not from the increasing power of the ruling few, but from the tyranny of the majority,…

    • 1265 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the 13 colonies along the Atlantic seaboard of North America declared independence, they had to create a new government. Because the colonies thought of themselves as separate, semi-sovereign entities – and because their experiences under British rule made them suspicious of centralized power – the government they created was a loose confederation of individual states. The national government under the Articles of Confederation had very little power; most power was retained by the individual states. Eventually, the weakness of the national government under the Articles led to their replacement with the current US Constitution. The delegates of the Constitutional Convention did not intend to make “great roads on the existing system” (70), but a constitutional revolution began when Edmund Randolph presented James Madison’s Virginia Plan. The talk of a brand new legislative branch and executive branch were in the making, and as John Adams would have said, “the delegates had ‘crossed the Rubicon’.” (70)…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays