Preview

America the Terrorist Nation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
338 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
America the Terrorist Nation
America as a Terrorist Nation Certainly sounds ambiguous doesn’t it. That’s a country that promotes itself as the center of the known universe for freedom and democracy would be involved in a terrorist act. Yet in Pakistan, in Afghanistan and in Yemen the actions of the Obama administration’s drone strikes are terrorist acts in the eyes of the people there on the ground. There are no monetary funds for them as there are in Boston to pay for the lost limbs and lives. A study was done and published in September 2012 that says that. The study was done by both New York and Stanford Universities. Here is the definition of what terrorism actually is and I will tell you some of the remarks I have heard through my contacts in Pakistan. One in 50 people are the actual target of a drone strike. The rest are what we like to call “collateral damage”. Its rhetoric that we as a nation use to mask any emotions of the act. I have been to Pakistan after a drone strike and cried with what I saw and felt ashamed to be an American that would do such a heinous and cowardly act of murdering innocent people . That is what a drone strike does. I have fresh pictures and video of America’s drone strikes sent to me by my contacts in Pakistan. . In my sleep and my dreams I can still hear the screams of the children and the cries of the men and women trapped in the rubble. It’s pure horror. But that is what terrorism is supposed to be. A brutal, public and bloody act meant to instil fear. That is what the feeling was in Boston after the Boston Marathon bombings. But the people of Pakistan and Afghanistan feel the same as the people in Boston did when they are bombed daily with drones. We as a nation cry foul. How could we as the cradle of democracy be associated with terrorism? Let’s look for the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In recent headlines a drone strike in North Waziristan (near the afghan border) killed sixteen Taliban militants. In a report later published by “Dawn” an English language newspaper in Pakistan the drone launched a second strike on the camp while rescuers were trying to save any survivors. While it is not known whether the rescuers were hostile or not the CIA launched the second missile and killed three of the search team members. This apparent collateral damage happened in the wake of CNN publishing an article on the recent decrease in civilian casualties during drone strikes. After hearing about this I researched the percentage of deaths (militant and civilian) in Pakistan, the number was eye opening a staggering sixteen percent of people killed during drone strikes in Pakistan were non-combatants. To me this means that the US and NATO have “murdered” hundreds of civilians for the “greater…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    They effectively state “The drone strikes are counterproductive because they gave rise to a desire, particularly among young men, to seek revenge for the drone strikes, thus radicalizing a new generation”. This statement shows how these drone attacks by the U.S. bring about a worse kind effect than any other, a rise in hatred towards the U.S. in the future leaders of Pakistan. Even if the hate from future generations establishes itself, the U.S. is doing what it believes is the best way to protect its people now and has stated plans to help Pakistan in the future in hope of reconciling the damages they are causing now. As Zeese and Flowers continue to describe the destruction that drones cause, eventually drones will be used more and more, causing their effectiveness to increase and eventually cause less destruction. Though the people of Pakistan would rather have less damage now, the damage caused by drones is very little in comparison to ground troops. In recent reports, many causalities and confrontations were caused by the U.S. troops and the many firefights with terrorists that pop out during their patrols. The drones on the other hand, cause less confrontation and can lead into less overall deaths in both civilians and troops…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Drone Strike Research Paper

    • 3615 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Researcher, 23, 885-908. Retrieved from http://library.cqpress.com.ezproxy.bu.edu/cqresearcher/ Micah Zenko, "Transferring CIA Drone Strikes to the Pentagon," cfr.org, Apr. 2013 “NOVA: Rise of the Drones,” pbs.org, last modified January 23 2013, http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/military/rise-of-the-drones.html. 
 Pew Research Center, "Global Attitudes Project," pewglobal.org, July 18, 2013 Philip Alston, "Study on Targeted Killings," Report of the Human Rights Council, Fourteenth Session, Agenda Item 3, May 28, 2010 Reaching Critical Will http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/resources/fact-sheets/critical-issues/6737-drones Reuters, "Pakistan: Drone Strikes Are Violations of Sovereignty," huffingtonpost.com, June 4, 2012 Ritka, Singh, "A Meta-Study of Drone Strike Casualties," lawfareblog.com, July 22, 2013…

    • 3615 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “A terrorist is one who sows terror,” says Elshtain. She means that the victims of terrorist attacks are subjected to terror, or great fear. The purpose of subjecting a group of people to such fear varies but usually aims to destroy the morale of a people in its attempt at some religious, political, or ideological goal. Crucial features of inducing terror are its randomness and its attack on civilians as opposed to combatants. This elicits fear in every person because they are afraid for their personal safety in their day to day lives, as opposed to fearing only for our soldiers. To determine who is a terrorist, we must ask who they are attacking. Do they mainly target combatants in the field or bases, do they try to destroy military equipment and are they open to negotiations? If so, we should not label them terrorists for simply being enemy combatants. However, if they are deliberately targeting noncombatants with the intention of killing as many civilians as possible, they are clearly terrorists.…

    • 1855 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The War on Terror is tough to define. It is considered a war, but not in the traditional sense. When one thinks of war they think of enemies, a battlefield, weapons, and death. However, the war on terror is slightly different. The lines that define enemies and allies are blurred, there is no battlefield, and the weapons come in all shapes and sizes. Nonetheless, there has still been death.…

    • 2016 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Put as simply as possible, however, terrorism is the “indiscriminate killing of innocent citizens for political goals” (Hislope and Mughan 262). Terrorism is a multifaceted, complicated concept with deep roots, which is what makes it so difficult to define. Terrorism is not an ideology, but it is a “method, a technique, a tactic” that a variety of groups use to achieve their political goals (Hislope and Mughan 239). Russian anarchist Peter Kropotkin described terrorism as “‘propaganda by the deed,’” suggesting that this kind of violence is simply a method of demonstrating a point that would not otherwise be heard (239). While terrorism definitely has gained prevalence in recent years, it “is anything but new,” with general origins dating back to the biblical Zealots (Rodenbeck 1). The term “‘terrorism’” first emerged during the French Revolution amid the Reign of Terror (Hislope and Mughan 248). However, the modern understanding of terrorism first emerged in the twentieth century, as non-governmental groups attempted to combat the increasing globalization occurring throughout the…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the attacks on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 and various other terrorist threats, the United States has used unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), or drones, to eliminate terrorists or potential terrorists. The US should continue using and developing drones as combat weapons because they have less collateral damage than impractical alternatives, keep our own troops safe, and aide military generals with photography and mapping of foreign countries. Moreover, because UAV's cannot guarantee the safety of the innocent bystanders, drones obtain the reputation of creating more terrorists than they tend to eliminate and not only do drone strikes violate the sovereignty in other countries, they also violate the rights of basic human rights. Consequently, drones may be perceived differently in the eyes of Americans and Pakistanis.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Cold War, and a bit after, the enemy to the United States was very clear, it was Russia and everything associated with “communism”. In the time following the Cold War, the focus of the United States has shifted significantly, and it will continue to do so. The enemy is no longer as easily targetable, it has become a guerilla type fighting force, with more intricacies than we have ever faced in the past. We have arguably had more technological growth in the last 30 years than we have in any short amount of time in the history of mankind. The growth has made intelligence collection, while more streamlined and faster, also exponentially more difficult. In the coming years, the United States will continue to focus on terrorism and everything…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Presently, one of the argumentation for drones are its cause and effect, and one being how many civilians actually end up becoming terrorists after an attack (Drones-procon.org). Jeremy Scahill, an author, states, “ The vast majority of militants operating in Yemen today is "people who are aggrieved by attacks on their homes that forced them to go out and fight". As can be seen, our drone intrusions are destroying people's homes and families, that their hatred towards the U.S. is completely justifiable. Ordinarily speaking the United States are killing fewer terrorists than they are fabricating, and only producing motivation for multiple bombings as well as killings in response…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Strikes

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After reading this article about the drone strikes and looking into other articles about drone strikes I am in favor of drone strikes that effectively hit the target without civilian deaths; (which is the major criticism of drone strikes) but not in favor of the power and strength our government is expressing while these strikes get used. These drone strikes are the centerpiece of the Obama administrations counter terrorism policy especially in Pakistan and Yemen. However though using these drone strikes as a part of our “counter terrorism policy” is hypocritical because like one the respondents to the article said “If Obama cannot understand that to wage terror is to invite terror then I for one can no longer believe in him.” This respondent is right, if America as a nation is going to be using these drone missile strikes on terrorists but end up killing a few civilians in the process is that moral? The continuous killing does not eliminate nor stop hatred towards the United States, in fact I think it makes the hatred stronger and other countries more inclined to recoil. Not only are these drone strikes not ethical or moral neither is this “disposition matrix” Obama has created to determine who will be executed (by drone strikes) without due process. This “kill list” Obama invented was started because he refused to detain terrorist suspects, instead his solution is to just kill them at will. This strikes several issues starting with our executive branch in this instance is over stretching not only their power but there right to act in this manner without going through proper policies. With this kill list keep getting added to either monthly or how ever often, is it even effective? Or just a way for the government to flex there power over the nation and too other nations. It’s a little of both in this circumstance, using drone strikes shows other nations we have the technology to strike all over the world whenever at the push of button,…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Warfare

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Branded the “War on Terror,” the Bush administration started drone warfare after the attacks made by al-Qaeda on September 11thin which he inherently legalized political assassinations; however, to call the pursuit of al-Qaeda a war would be inaccurate. Sir Christopher Greenwood, the British judge on the International Court of Justice, has written: “…there is no basis for speaking of a war on al-Qaeda or any other terrorist group, for such a group… is merely a band of criminals, and to treat it as anything else risks… giving that group a status which to some implies a degree of legitimacy.”1 Unlike the U.S. role in World War I&II which was against standing countries, this declaration of war against a simple group has done nothing but bolster its’ status…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, the idea that the drones would annihilate the terrorists without harming anyone else is not as simple as it sounds. The operators who fire missiles onto the other side of the world are making an imperfect guess because most drone strike targets are very difficult to access to outside observers (Speri, 2014). Furthermore, although some drones have targeted Al Qaeda leaders, many of them have been strikes against individuals with unknown identity whose behavior model apparently connected them to terrorist groups (Shane, 2012). Regarding these points at least 1,100 civilians have been killed during the war and more than 200 of them were children (The Bureau, January 2015). The death of civilians may result in negative backlash effects, creating strain and anomie, and reducing the legitimacy of those fighting terrorism. Strain theory suggests when people of a society treated unfairly or they suppose that they have been treated unfairly, they violent crime results. In this case, more terrorism may be a response (LaFree and Ackerman, 2009). The terrorist propagandas against the U.S. and the government of Pakistan that cooperate with the U.S. in conducting strikes makes less these administration less legitimate. Consequently, people who were law-abiding would be more likely to obey social controls stimulating them to retaliate the attacks. This means although the drones apparently are killing terrorists, they are simultaneously creating more extremists and…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attack on America

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I was quite saddened by the event that took place on September 11, 2001. An unfortunate tragedy occurred in New York that will go down in history. Two airplanes crashed into the World Trade Center, causing them to collapse, injuring and killing thousands of people.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beginning in 2001 after 9-11, America has been in a war on terrorism. Originally, we were fighting a terrorist group called Al Qaeda. That war pretty much ended after we killed their leader Osama Bin Laden. Unfortunately, The war on terrorism did not end there. After Al Qaeda was defeated another terrorist organization named ISIS was born.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Drones War Pros And Cons

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages

    What is the price of freedom? To the United States, it is protecting its borders from threats foreign and domestic with as little casualties as possible. The United States military has been using a method that reduces threats and minimizes American casualties to virtually zero. Since 2004, American forces have been using new technology in drone warfare to eliminate believed terrorists with unmanned aircrafts in Pakistan. It seems like there can only be positives for the world with terrorists dying and no human cost. Drone use does have its negatives and one major downfall is the human cost. The use of drones has taken a toll on the people of Pakistan physically and mentally. Many innocent people have been affected, hurt, and even killed from U.S. drones. The United States believes it is protecting their people but in turn can be creating more hatred and future terrorism by the prominent use of drone warfare.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays