Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

America was or was not justified in breaking away from Great Britain?

Good Essays
976 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
America was or was not justified in breaking away from Great Britain?
America was or was not justified in breaking away from Great Britain?

America had every right, mind and aspect, to throw off the almost inexorable chains of Great Britain. Not only declaring war against the British was justified, but it was the only choice America had. From the very beginning, (when the colonists first migrated to America) the colonists were displeased with Great Britain's law-makings and government. When diplomatic options and agreements with Great Britain failed, America realized it was time to act and retaliate. The colonists' disagreements with Great Britain's law-makings, the specific unforgettable conflicts/events the colonists had with Great Britain, and the great desire for individuality, and freedom of rights of the colonists ultimately led to the declaration of war, the American Revolution.

One of the reasons that fueled America's rage that ultimately led to the American Revolution and the breaking away from Great Britain was Great Britain's government and law-makings such as the Stamp Act of 1765. This act was passed mainly because Britain had amassed large war debts from wars like the French and Indian War. According to the Stamp Act, "American colonists were required to apply tax stamps to all official documents, including deeds, mortgages, newspapers, and pamphlets." This act was intended to generate money from the colonies that would help pay for the cost to keep up a stable force of British troops in the American colonies, but instead, led to oppositions by the American colonists. The colonists convened the Stamp Act Congress to protest the act, which they called, "taxation without representation." Colonists (who were already destitute) did not believe this act was righteous and fair, and it was because of this act that the colonists were forced to economic hardships and worst conditions of poverty. In addition, the Stamp Act not only led to economic depressions, but to the uprising of the colonists against the British and the increasing desire of the colonists for self-government. Thus, this aided to build the foundations for the American Revolution and the motivation for seceding from Great Britain.

One of the specific unforgettable events that stimulated America in breaking away with Great Britain was the Boston Massacre in 1770. It was the "massacre" that changed the opinion the colonists' opinions about how they felt about the British. The story told about this bloody event is that there was confusion among the British officers when the American colonists approached, and as a result, the British randomly fired on the crowd of colonists. According to chapter 7 of the AP US history book, the American Pageant, "the British troops opened fire and killed or wounded eleven innocent citizens. One of the first to die was Crispus Attucks, described by contemporaries as a powerfully built runaway mulatto and as a leader of the mob." The results of this gory event depicted propagandas that the British were organized, and aimed to kill. Paul Revere's drawing of "The Boston Massacre" best displays this propaganda. Not only did this picture energized anger in the colonists to break away from Great Britain, it also revealed the British as having the desire to kill people. Furthermore, it portrayed the British as murderers, more reason for the colonists to unite to rise and declare war against Great Britain.

America's powerful aspiration for individuality and freedom of rights also led to the motivation for breaking away from Great Britain. The colonists were weary of the tyranny of the King of Great Britain's complete control and authority over the colonies. They were infuriated by how the King's objective was to only strengthen the government, thus not allowing the people any freedom of speech (which was another reason why the colonists migrated to America). According to chapter 7 of the AP US history book, The American Pageant, "By 1770 King George III, then only thirty-two years old, was strenuously attempting to assert the power of the British monarchy... he proved to be a bad ruler. Earnest, industrious, stubborn, and lustful for power..." An example of the King's terrible leadership is when he passed the Townshend Act in 1767 which placed duties on colonial imports of lead, glass, and other necessities. This act also specified that the tax money be to be used not only to support British troops in America, but also to provide salaries for British officials. American colonists were enraged by this because they were becoming "puppets" of the King, and how they had to struggle to survive because of the taxes the King established. John Dickinson argued in his influential letters from a farmer in Pennsylvania (1767) that the Townshend duties were "not for the regulation of trade... but for the single purpose of levying money upon us." The only way that the people of America could accept the laws of the King is when the King accepted their ideas and beliefs. This, the colonists knew, would be impossible. Furthermore, they knew that if they were not granted their individuality and freedom, their nation would be halted in augmentation. These men wanted to be recognized as their own people, and knew they had to act because they knew living under England's shadow was no way to prosperity.

In conclusion, the several components that fueled the colonists to break away from Great Britain are the colonists' disapprovals of Great Britain's law-makings and governments (The Stamp Act), the many haunting events that triggered the American Revolution (The Boston Massacre as one of them), and the colonists' relentless desire for individuality and freedom of rights. These evidences proved to be vital in the decision America made to shatter the chains from Great Britain. The Declaration of Independence is put best by saying that the Americans attempted their hardest to avoid war, by petitions and peaceful means, but when that failed, war was their last and only resort. Thus, America was indeed very justified in breaking away from Great Britain.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Britain was very controlling of the colonies and wanted to control the trade that was happening during this time which made the colonies angry (document 3). This document is likely a reliable source of information because it is a primary source, and a law written during the late 1700’s. Additionally, Britain started to put forth acts that caused conflict for the colonies. One being the Stamp Act. The Stamp Acts required all documents that were “official” to be stamped and taxed. This act was “extremely burdensome and grievous” and “restrictions imposed… render them unable to purchase the manufactures of Great Britain.” Britain thought that there was no reason the colonists should not help to repay the debt from the war which caused a conflict (document 2). On top of the Stamp Act, multiple others were also imposed, including the Sugar Act and the Townshend Act. The Townshend Act was disliked because it added some tax on tea which was a good that everyone drank. The Sugar Act was also disliked because the colonists just did not understand why they had to pay the tax. Because of these acts, the colonists rebelled. In Britain, people were born into their social classes whereas in America, people could choose their classes. British people did not like the Americans which was obvious…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Taxation without representation was the main factor which led the American colonies to declare their independence from Great Britain. The Sugar Act was the first in the series of British Colonial taxation acts that provided fuel for revolutionary mood in American colonies. Shortly thereafter came the British Stamp Act. This time the new tax burden took form of official stamps that colonists had to purchase and that were required for legal contracts, newspapers, and other official paperwork. The protests in the colonies started as the news broke. This led to the creation of The Sons of Liberty. Under John Adams they organized riots and violent attacks to intimidate tax collectors.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    British merchants were greatly affected by the colonists determined boycott protests, that they begged parliament to stop the Stamp Act. February 1766, the Act was canceled. But the British didn’t stop, they were resilient and came up with newer Acts and ways of taxing the American colonies. The British parliament passed Acts such as the Declaratory Act, the Townshend Act, the Tea Act and the Coercive Act that further angered the colonists by making them feel restricted, ignored and unfairly treated. 4 1676, Charles Townshend, new finance minister, came up with the Townshend Act.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The colonists had many reasons to declare independence against Britain. The colonists believed the British were unfair to the colonists, one way was by taxation without representation. The colonists had no representatives in Parliament, so when Parliament passed taxes without the consent of the colonists, they believed it was very unfair, and they shouldn’t have to pay the taxes. Also, the British put many taxes on goods for the colonists. Some examples of these taxes were the sugar act, a tax on sugar, the stamp act, the law to buy a stamp for every single paper they had, and the tea act, which not only taxed the colonists for tea, but it also allowed the British to have control of all tea trade. The colonists did not like these taxes because…

    • 238 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Americans, under the control of the British, were faced with undeserved mistreatment. One example out of many came in March of 1765 when Parliament imposed the Stamp Act on the Northern American colonies. This act placed a tax on all printed paper the colonies used in order to help pay the British debt from war. This act built tension between the colonies and Britain because it was the first instance of taxation without representation. When the chance to repeal the Stamp Act was before the House, William Pitt fought for the Americans. William Pitt convinced his constituents that the Stamp Act was unconstitutional, and should be repealed, by using specific sources and reminding the House that Americans helped the British…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People sometimes wonder if America should have stayed with Great Britain. They say it would have gotten good profits, but I am going to explain why the colonist were justified in fighting and breaking away from Great Britain. The French and Indian war happened in 1750. After the war, British were in debt and placed taxes on colonist. The colonist were shocked and angry that they were being taxed. Waging war and breaking away Britain was justified for the colonist. The colonist were justified in fighting and breaking away from Great Britain because British were making unfair taxes, the colonist weren’t represented in parliament, and British were violating the colonist rights.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In America there were many reasons that colonists on both sides of the issue of taxation had for whether taxes on the American people were necessary and justified. In the reading about the colonist’s responses to the stamp act of 1765, both sides were represented. The people who were in favor of the stamp act felt that America had created a burden on the British government and that they needed to help lessen that burden on England. They also felt that since the government had protected the colonists from Native Americans that America owed them for maintain peace and their freedom. By continuing with the negative reactions the colonists were giving it would result in the loss of America and in by doing so would allow for other countries to use the opportunity to become stronger and challenge the authority of the English government. While some people were for taxation others were not as willing. They thought that since they were British citizens and they came to the colonies that they deserved the same rights as the people back Britain. Placing a tax on the colonist, they felt, was also in conflict with previous rulings of other decrees like the Manga Charta. They also placed an emphasis on how laws in England may…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, the war changed America's economic reliance on its mother country to economic disharmony as American culture and practicality threatened their relationship. Before the war, the colonies were scattered groups of religious refugees and poor immigrants aspiring to better things. Britain funded the original settlements and supported them as they struggled to survive. Once the colonies finally took root, Britain stepped back and demanded no money from them through taxes or debt, although its native citizens paid taxes regularly. However, over the course of the French and Indian War, Britain racked up a huge debt, and because the initial fighting took place in North America, defending the American lands from the French, Britain felt it logical and necessary to ask taxes of the growing nation. These included the Stamp Act in 1765 and the Townshend Revenue Act of 1767. However, the colonies reacted violently. After the Stamp Act required the colonies to pay extra for all paper goods, 'Hated Stamp' cartoons appeared in colonial newspapers that depicted the British seal as a skull and crossbones. This symbol of death represented how threatened the colonies felt by the constricting tax. It also inspired the Stamp Act Resolutions of 1765, a response from the colonies to the crown that explained their displeasure at being subject to taxes on which they had no political say. The Resolutions demanded the repeal of the Stamp Act and the repeal of any other acts restricting American commerce in any way. The Townshend Acts, an attempt to avoid colonial anger by utilizing external taxes to raise revenue, tried to explain to the necessity of British taxes: "...it is expedient that a revenue should be raised, in your Majesty's dominions in America, for making…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    American Colonies Dbq

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It wasn’t until the Stamp act of 1765 that Americans started to have financial difficulties, this act affected almost all of the colonists since it placed a tax on all printed documents. The stamp act however was different from previous tax acts, although other acts raised some income for the British government that was never their main purpose. The stamp act’s main purpose was to raise income and to help alleviate some of the economic troubles caused by previous wars. What made the colonist most agitated was that they had no say in the making of the act since they were not represented properly in parliament. The colonists tried to appeal the law with answers such as the Virginia Resolves but parliament eventually passed the Declaratory Act, which reassured the fact that parliament had full control over the colonists in all situations. After the Declaratory Act, parliament continued to bombard the colonists with unjust laws, one large program of laws was called the Townshend Program. This program reinforced laws already put in place that the colonists refused to obey and also created new ones. The acts and laws put in place by Townshend, except for the tea tax, were eventually appealed by Britain to end the colonists’ boycotts. But this program got the colonists starting to think about a revolution, especially after an over exaggerated event known as the Boston Massacre. The colonists tried to spread and keep the resistance strong mostly through the writing and talking of colonists in the colonies. The last acts to finally push the Americans into revolting were known as the Coercive Acts, also known as the intolerable Acts to most of the colonists. It created numerous boycotts around the colonies and was the final piece of unjust laws enforced by the…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Economic struggles during the colonization period leading up to the revolution included the Stamp Act which imposed a direct tax on British American colonies and required that most printed materials in the colonies are produced and manufactured on stamped paper from London, with a embodied revenue stamp on the paper, the Declaratory Act which repealed the Stamp Act but allowed the British to use the declaration to warrant that Parliament’s authority was the same in America as in Britain and there authority to pass laws were the same. The decline in taxation after several attempts to decline Britain rule over the Americas from the Stamp Act to the Boston Tea…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though the colonists were breaking British law, the colonists had a right to rebel for they were unfairly taxed without representation and subjected to a king over 3000 miles away. Some people still on both the colonials and the British crown were attempting to avoid a full scale war even after they had begun fighting, like in the Battle of Bunker Hill. Most of the colonists did not want war because these were the people that they had been living with, and protected by the British for over 150 years and the idea of being alone and self governing was hard for the colonists to comprehend and prepare for. Though that was how most felt about the situation at the time, neither side would budge or compromise.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Americans were justified in waging war because King George III was ignoring and not listening to the colonists.” Some of them had been tarred, others had their property burnt and destroyed by the populace”(Doc. I). The King of British did not give any of the colonists a say in the government which caused the tarring and destroyed populaces. “There is another late act of Parliament...The Townshend Act.” (Doc. B). The colonists once again didn’t have a say in the government. The colonists didn’t even have a choice about the…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Quartering Act Essay

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Gentlemen may cry, ‘Peace! Peace!’ -- but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! (...) I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!” (Henry, 1775). Great Britain passed many laws that brewed trouble between the colonists and the British. But there were two laws that stood out the most. The Stamp Act was a law passed by Parliament and was established on March 22, 1765. The Quartering Act was 2 British laws passed by the Parliament of Great Britain in 1765 and 1774; it was also part of the Intolerable Acts. The Stamp Act and Quartering Act were the two most important events that contributed to colonists getting involved in the American Revolution. Those two acts were crucial to the cause of…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Stamp Act of 1765 was passed by the parliament basically to raise revenue. That led to new taxes being imposed on all American colonists. The Townshend Acts of 1767 was passed by the parliament to impose duties on the colonies. The Colonists were becoming more n more enraged. Then On March 5, 1770 The Boston “Massacre” happened. This was the big event that united the colonists and makes them go to war against the British. The Boston Massacre was when the British Soldiers began shooting at a crowd of colonists. Many people were dead and more was wounded. The picture shows how the British were violent and killers, it was sent throughout the colonies and it arouses anti-British feelings. {Document 2 & Document…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They did not want to pay for troops to be around just to watch them. Major conflict arose when the British Parliament passed the Stamp Act in March 1765, placing a direct tax on the American colonies. Colonists reacted by enacting widespread boycotts of British goods. This two sided conflict led to a reluctant resolution on the side of the British; The Stamp Act was repealed the following…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays