Preview

almocera vs ong

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3629 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
almocera vs ong
G.R. No. 170479 February 18, 2008
ANDRE T. ALMOCERA, petitioner, vs. JOHNNY ONG, respondent.
D E C I S I O N
CHICO-NAZARIO, J.:
Before Us is a Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure which seeks to set aside the Decision1 of the Court of Appeals dated 18 July 2005 in CA-G.R. CV No. 75610 affirming in toto the Decision2 of Branch 11 of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Cebu City in Civil Case No. CEB-23687 and its Resolution3 dated 16 November 2005 denying petitioner’s motion for reconsideration. The RTC decision found petitioner Andre T. Almocera, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of First Builder Multi-Purpose Cooperative (FBMC), solidarily liable with FMBC for damages.
Stripped of non-essentials, the respective versions of the parties have been summarized by the Court of Appeals as follows:
Plaintiff Johnny Ong tried to acquire from the defendants a "townhome" described as Unit No. 4 of Atrium Townhomes in Cebu City. As reflected in a Contract to Sell, the selling price of the unit was P3,400,000.00 pesos, for a lot area of eighty-eight (88) square meters with a three-storey building. Out of the purchase price, plaintiff was able to pay the amount of P1,060,000.00. Prior to the full payment of this amount, plaintiff claims that defendants Andre Almocera and First Builders fraudulently concealed the fact that before and at the time of the perfection of the aforesaid contract to sell, the property was already mortgaged to and encumbered with the Land Bank of the Philippines (LBP). In addition, the construction of the house has long been delayed and remains unfinished. On March 13, 1999, Lot 4-a covered by TCT No. 148818, covering the unit was advertised in a local tabloid for public auction for foreclosure of mortgage. It is the assertion of the plaintiff that had it not for the fraudulent concealment of the mortgage and encumbrance by defendants, he would have not entered into the contract to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case brief

    • 593 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Issues: 1) Whether the district court erred in concluding that hay is not a “product “for purposes of a strict liability in tort cause of action. 2) Whether the District Court erred in concluding that the Rothings negligence claim against Kallestad fails because it was unforeseeable that the hay could cause injury and death to the Rothings’ horses, thus no duty of care existed. 3) Whether the District Court erred in concluding that the Rothings’ breach of contract claim against Kallestad fails because it was unforeseeable that the hay could cause injury and death to the Rothings’ horses. 4) Whether the District Court erred in imposing discovery sanctions against the Rothings. 5) Whether the District Court erred in awarding attorney’s fees to Kallestad and denying the Rothings a hearing in respect to the calculation of attorney’s fees. (₱3-7)…

    • 593 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Business Law

    • 2266 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Robert Briggs and his wife purchased a home located at 167 Lower Orchard Drive, Levittown, Pennsylvania. They made a down payment and borrowed the balance on a 30-year mortgage. Six years later, when Mr. and Mrs. Briggs were behind on their mortgage payments, they entered into an oral contract to sell the house to Winfield and Emma Sackett if the Sacketts would pay the three months’ arrearages on the loan and agree to make the future payments on the mortgage. Mrs. Briggs and Mrs. Sackett were sisters. The Sacketts paid the arrearages, moved into the house, and continued to live there. Fifteen years later, Robert Briggs filed an action to void the oral contract as in violation of the Statute of Frauds and evict the Sacketts from the house. Who wins? Briggs v. Sackett, 275 Pa. Super. 13, 418 A.2d 586, Web 1980 Pa.Super. Lexis 2034 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania).…

    • 2266 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The proposed final draft of class action of late Justice Somboon Boonpinon’s object is to solve the problem of mass tort or mass injured person. This draft was made from the model rule 23 of the united stated about class action. This class action has to be separate from the normal civil procedure as it has its special characteristic which differs from the normal procedure. The most important and significant feature of class action is draft of section 222/35 said “the decision will bind all member of the class” regardless whether they have involved in the litigation or not. This is overrule the principle of section 145 of Civil Procedure code; within paragraph 2 said “..the decision shall not bind third person..” Moreover, this draft section 222/35 grants the power to the counsel to enforce the decision on behalf of the plaintiff and the member of the class. The member of the class only has the right to request his share but not to enforce individually. In present procedure, the counsel of the plaintiff will have the authority to do so only his client grants him the power.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    By a letter of offer dated 23.12.1999 the plaintiff granted to Precision Tube Product (M) Sdn Bhd (the 1st defendant) various banking facilities amounting to RM13,960,000.00. The banking facilities were secured by a legal charge over a factory owned by the 1st defendant, a debenture over all assets of the 1st defendant and a guarantee by its 2 directors Jamer Singh (the 2nd defendant) and Tejinder Raj Singh (the 3rd defendant). By a letter of offer dated 28.4.2000 the plaintiff granted to the 1st defendant an additional banking facility of RM1,590,000.00. By a letter of offer dated 29.6.2000 the plaintiff granted to the 1st defendant a further banking facility of RM7,450,000.00. On 23.8.2000 the plaintiff and the 1st defendant entered into a Facility Agreement relating to the aforesaid banking facilities. On 28.8.2003 the plaintiff restructured the various banking facilities granted to the 1st defendant on the security of a supplementary facility agreement which was executed on 2.9.2003. According to the Supplementary Facility Agreement the existing…

    • 2572 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Litonjua obtained loans from L&R Corporation secured by a mortgage. Without knowledge of L&R, Litonjua sold to PWHAS the parcels of land they had previously mortgaged to L & R Corporation. When Litonjua defaulted in the payment of their loans, L & R Corporation initiated extrajudicial foreclosure proceedings and L & R Corporation was the only bidder. When L & R Corporation presented its corresponding Certificate of Sale for registration, it learned of the prior sale of the properties made by the Litonjua to PWHAS upon seeing the inscription at the back of the certificates of title. 7 months after the foreclosure sale, PWHAS, for the account of Litonjua tendered payment of the full redemption price to L & R. The latter, however, refused to accept the payment, hence, PWHAS was compelled to redeem the mortgaged properties through the Sheriff. A Certificate of Redemption was issued in favor of Litonjua. L & R Corporation challenges the decision of the court.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    005 PHOENIX CONSTRUCTION, INC. and ARMANDO U. CARBONEL, petitioners, 
vs.
THE INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT and LEONARDO DIONISIO, respondents.…

    • 851 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The records disclose the following antecedent facts which culminated in the present appellate review, to wit:…

    • 37874 Words
    • 152 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    SALES CASES

    • 65323 Words
    • 156 Pages

    The petition before us has its roots in a complaint for specific performance to compel herein petitioners (except the last named, Catalina Balais Mabanag) to consummate the sale of a parcel of land with its improvements located along Roosevelt Avenue in Quezon City entered into by the parties sometime in January 1985 for the price of P1,240,000.00.The undisputed facts of the case were summarized by respondent court in this wise:On January 19, 1985, defendants-appellants Romulo Coronel, et. al. (hereinafter referred to as Coronels) executed a document entitled “Receipt of Down Payment” (Exh. “A”) in favor of plaintiff Ramona Patricia Alcaraz (hereinafter referred to as Ramona) which is reproduced hereunder:…

    • 65323 Words
    • 156 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PROVREM cases

    • 3941 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Teresita P. Arellano, defendant in Civil Case No. 11-1041 then pending before Branch 6 of the Regional Trial Court of the Second Judicial Region and stationed in Aparri, Cagayan, filed a verified complaint for neglect of duty, misconduct, bias, and partiality against —…

    • 3941 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The plaintiff brought these proceedings in order to obtain an account from the defendant for the proceeds of sale of a property, formerly owned by the plaintiff, sold in a mortgagee sale by the defendant, pursuant to orders in separate proceedings between the same parties. The plaintiff sought an order for interim payment, under R.S.C Order 29, rules 10 and 12, of part of the proceeds of sale which was surplus to the amount claimed by the mortgagee. A master granted an order for interim payment. The defendant appealed. The defendant contended that the order should be declined in the exercise of the court's discretion, because of related proceedings between the parties and parties associated with them.…

    • 2334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    sample of plaint

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. The plaintiff has purchased the following property from Imran Rashid under title deed no. 1278, Registered with Sub-Registrar of Mohakhali, Dhaka-1212, and Dated on 5.5.2005. Then immediately the possession of the following land property has been delivered to the plaintiff by one Imran Rashid, seller of the land property.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Digest Election Law

    • 4564 Words
    • 19 Pages

    On October 16, 1969, Filipinas filed an Injunction suit with the then Court of First Instance of Manila, docketed as Civil Case No. 77972, against herein public respondents COMELEC Commissioners, chairman and members of the Comelec Bidding Committee, and private respondent Acme.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library…

    • 4564 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Assailed via Petition for Review on Certiorari are the November 8, 2002 Decision and August 25, 2003 Resolution of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CV No. 46297, "QVEGG Marine Transport and Builders Corporation v. Philippine Fisheries Development Authority."…

    • 15062 Words
    • 41 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On May 15, 1992, respondent Leyte Gulf Traders, Inc. (herein referred to as respondent corporation) filed a complaint for reformation of instrument, specific performance, annulment of conditional sale and damages with prayer for writ of injunction against petitioners Yolanda Rosello-Bentir and the spouses Samuel and Charito Pormida. The case was docketed as Civil Case No. 92-05-88 and raffled to Judge Pedro S. Espina, RTC, Tacloban City, Branch 7. Respondent corporation alleged that it entered into a contract of lease of a parcel of land with petitioner Bentir for a period of twenty (20) years starting May 5, 1968. According to respondent corporation, the lease was extended for another four (4) years or until May 31, 1992. On May 5, 1989, petitioner Bentir sold the leased premises to petitioner spouses Samuel…

    • 93013 Words
    • 373 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Annulment

    • 3221 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Petitioner, Cristita C. Quirino (Cris for brevity) is of legal age, Filipino and presently residing at Brgy, Sambag, Cebu City, Cebu, married to respondent. For the notices and processes of this Honorable Court, petitioner may be served thereof at the undersigned counsel’s address;…

    • 3221 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays