In this movie, we are introduced to a world in which machines had imprisoned man into a virtual world called “the matrix”. There the main protagonist “Neo” founds himself living in this world in questioning whether is real or not, and manages to scape with the help of a group of survivors from the real world. Yet the real world was not what he expected, earth was devastated by a long war between man and machines, and what is left of humanity lives in an underground city were the sewers of the old world use to be. We can consider the Matrix to be the cave, and the shadows projected by the fire, it also presents two possible outcomes from finding true knowledge. In the allegory, Plato believes that if an individual manages to escape from the cave it could end up in two ways. The first way indicates that if a man manages to escape the cave, he would be overwhelmed by the light, and the actual shapes of the shadows he saw, “Don’t you think he would be puzzled, and believe what he saw before was truer than what was shown to him?”(Plato pg2) indicating that the individual who got out would have trouble believing the things from outside the cave would be real. In the movie Neo faces the same problem when he is liberated from the matrix believing that the real world was actually a dream. The second way this could end up is if the individual finds himself to overwhelm by the real world to the point that …show more content…
This meditation makes emphasis in analyzing the things that someone can really call knowledge and that if there is even a slight reason to question whether you are right or not you should then dump everything you deed based from those principles, and be left with only the foundations of the principle. Scientific knowledge is a good example for this meditation because according to Descartes: “Physics, astronomy, medicine, and other disciplines which depend on the study of composite things are doubtful”; while subjects like arithmetic “deal only with the most simple and general things contain something certain and indubitable” (Descartes pg 167). Science relies in facts, but most of these facts can be prove wrong for example: A theory is a widely and likeable explanation to an event, yet it only has the word “possible” because an event or discovery may happen, and could really question the reliability of the theory and if wrong, then scientist will have to start from zero again in order to solve the problem. Although this may sound unlikely to happen today, there had been theories such as the “flat/centric earth” that people believed to be true some hundreds of years ago, but were proven wrong by scientist later