All Knowing Evil

An all-knowing being would know evil exists. An all-loving being would want to prevent evil. An all-powerful being could prevent evil from existing, but yet evil still exist. Therefore it can be concluded an all-knowing being, an all-loving and all powerful being doesn’t exist. Philosopher Alvin Carl Plantinga put a proposition that is logically possible for a God to create a world that does contain evil. Further support for this claim comes from it as a world containing humans who are “significantly free” and freely perform more good than evil actions is more valuable all else being equal a world containing no free humans at all. Now God can create humans but can’t force them to do only what is right and if he does so then they aren’t “significantly free.” Humans wouldn’t be doing what is right freely. To create humans for moral good he must create humans capable of moral evil and can give these humans the freedom to perform evil and at the same
There have been instances of suffering that were unjustified and pointless. If god was good he would get rid of the evil that is pointless. It’s just to say if God is a good being, God would eliminate pointless suffering. The epitome of being a good person is to do something about pointless suffering. Therefore in Rowe’s conclusion wholly good being doesn’t exist. If there are instances of pointless suffering and if there were an Omni-God, then there would be no instances of pointless suffering. Given the argument there is no Omni-God. Rowe is trying to show that we can prove deductively that can have an absolute logical guarantee about but there are other things that we just know inductively and reasonable to believe. On the other hand Rowe still cannot prove there is no God. Rowe believes his premise one is rationally justified. Premise one has to be true only because there do exist many instances of intense