Preview

Alienation vs. Hindu Joint Family

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5976 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Alienation vs. Hindu Joint Family
INTRODUCTION
A Hindu joint family consists of all persons lineally descended from a common ancestor and includes their wives and unmarried daughters. But a Hindu coparcenary is a much narrower body than the joint family. It includes only those persons who acquire by birth an interest in the joint or coparcenery property. These are the sons, grandsons and the great grandsons of the holder of joint property for time being, in other words the holder in unbroken male descent. The essence of coparcenary under Mitakshara law is unity of ownership. The interest is of fluctuating nature, capable of being enlarged by deaths in family and liable to be diminished by births in the family. It is only on partition that he becomes entitled to a definite share. Joint family property is purely the creation of Hindu Law, and those who own it are called coparceners.
Alienation means transfer of property, such as gifts, sales and mortgages. Alienations have an added importance in Hindu law, as, ordinarily, neither the karta nor any coparcener singly, possesses full power of alienation over the joint family property or over his interest in the joint family property, though under the Dayabhaga School a coparcener has the right of alienation over his interest in the joint family property. In this project we are not concerned with the alienation of separate property, as every Hindu, whether governed by the Mitakshare School or any of its sub-schools or the Dayabhaga School has full and absolute power over it. Such alienation is governed by the Transfer of Property Act.
Persons Competent to Alienate the Joint Family Property
Only the coparceners possess the right to alienate the joint family property. The non-coparcener members of the family do not have this authority. The coparceners who have such competence may be classified as follows:
1) The father,
2) The Karta,
3) Single coparcener in his personal capacity, and
4) All coparceners as one body.

FATHER’S POWER OF

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    (Cheeseman2013) In the case of Cunningham v. Hastings, Mr. Hastings and Mrs. Cunningham, was an unmarried couple, purchased a home together. Mr. Hastings put $45,000 down payment toward the home out of his pocket. When it came to how the deed established the deed stated Hastings Cunningham as joint tenants with the right of survivorship. The couple occupied the property jointly. When the relationship between the two ended, Mr. Hastings seized sole possession of the property. Mrs. Cunningham filed a complaint seeking partition of the real estate. Based on its determination that the property could not be split, the trial court ordered it to be sold. The trial court further ordered that $45,000 of the sale proceeds be paid to Mr. Hastings to reimburse…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The main point of the article is that in India, nearly all marriages are arranged marriages, unlike in Western culture.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To set them apart in another way, the Indians “openly engaged in premarital sexual relations and could even choose to divorce their husbands” (10). “Under English law, a married man controlled the family’s property” (10). In Indian gender relation, the women take charge; on the other hand, the English men make the…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Every country and every religion have their own traditions. It is what makes their culture different from each other. The American and Indian cultures have a vast differentiation between them. While the culture of America is a mixture of different cultures, the Indian culture is unique and has its own values. Even though dating and marriage have the same meaning to him and her in every culture, the meaning of their relationships and wedding celebrations to him and her are different.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    "Separation can challenge at the occasions under the most neighborly of conditions, and blessings now and then include another layer of disappointment - for youthful and old. Edwin Lyngar in Reno, Nev., has two children from his first marriage. From his second he has two more children and one stepson. Normally, he and his ex arrange presents for their two, however he reviews an unapproved electric piano one year when his girl, now 13, was around 5.....Whether present goofs are inadvertent or deliberately, a touch of arranging can go far" (Reno Newspaper Diary). This article portrays the difficulties confronted by separated families over purchasing Christmas presents for their…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Concurrent Ownership

    • 7123 Words
    • 29 Pages

    * Prof (Dr.) Kumar, V. Hindu Law of Coparcenary and its Composition (PowerPoint Slide). Scribd.com. Retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/33115992/2-Hindu-Law-of-Coparcenary-and-Its-Composition…

    • 7123 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    God in the Garden of Eden performed the first marriage. Adam and Eve, both made in God 's image, were joined together by God and commanded to "be fruitful and multiply, and replenish the earth" (Genesis 1). God declared them to be "one flesh" (Genesis 2) and established the pattern of marriage to be a man leaving his father and mother and being joined to his wife (Genesis 2). Marriage in the Bible is a lifelong commitment between a man and woman before God. Marriage is the institution God established for sexual relations and the continuation of the human race. Marriage was created in Genesis 2:23-24, “"The man said, ‘this is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called “woman,” for she was taken out of man.’ For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh."…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Code of Gortyn

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When a father dies his property goes to his children. His widow may remarry and take with her anything her husband gave her in front of…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this modern day and time, families range from traditional to modern. The traditional family is a vulnerable mirage, holding on to values once strongly deemed necessary. The modern family is a deviant reflection of traditional family. The composition of traditional nuclear family members no longer exists only in traditional sense. Participants in modern families are, the traditional man, woman and child, partnered gay men and lesbian women with or without child, single man and child, and a woman and child. Many of the family styles are responses to…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fraternal polyandry explains it in terms of land inheritance. If two or more brothers share their land and share a wife there is no need for division of property and land fragmentation, such as plagued India, where holding become progressively smaller whenever sons divided land inherit from their father. One function of the system has been to preserve landholding intact from one generation to the next (Bornouw 105).…

    • 2884 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Difficulties arose if these relationships broke down, as the trustees were under a duty to sell and had only a power to postpone that duty. Due to the doctrine of conversion, beneficiaries had no interest in the land and no right to occupy it. If one partner demanded the property to be sold, the other half would have difficulty in refuting, especially as the power to postpone required consent from both parties.2 Despite the courts developing the doctrine of continuing purpose that worked to prevent this,3 it was obvious that a full on reform was required to update the statute in this area.…

    • 2305 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    A current focus area for law reform has been de facto families. Previously, the law did not allocate them legal recognition, as society perceived these relationships as immoral. Altering societal ethics led to their statutory recognition under the Property (Relationships) Act 1984 (NSW), granting them many of the same rights as married couples. However, whilst one party could claim maintenance upon the breakdown of a DFR, the law does not take into account future needs of the parties upon separation. The law also attempted to regulate the division of property however, less weight was given to non‐financial contributions, shown in Turnbull v McGregor where the homemaker’s contribution to the property in a 32 yr relationship was valued at just 16%. This ineffectiveness was addressed with the Family Law Amendment (De Facto Financial Matters…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Issues Within Remarriage

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Initial stressing issues are a highly responsible for issues that appear in the future. Many times the biological parent is caught in the middle between the stepparent and her children. Introducing a stepparent can often be very strenuous to the biological parent. Remarriage sometimes involves a re-location to another town. The geographic move can cause stress in the children's school, the child's peer group, and many other places. This move may also make the issue of seeing the absent parent difficult. (Crosbie-Burnett, 1989)…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karta: The position of the Karta in a Hindu coparcenary is a case of corporate personality. In coparcenary framework albeit every individual from the joint Hindu Family has a few rights and obligations and despite the fact that it is a solitary familial unit, a Joint Hindu Family does not have a different legitimate character and is not a juristic person. It is not fit for holding property and the law does not credit any identity to a Joint Hindu Family. The Karta is overall head of the joint family who manages the entire family property. He has a right to alienate the property and different individuals from the family are under his control. He can sue and be sued for the benefit of the joint family. In juristic terms, he is a corporation…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hindu Joint Family

    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Hindu joint family is a kind of family system, which is typically seen amongst the Hindus only. The concept of Hindu joint family is nothing new, and it is in existence since long. This kind of family was well recognised by customary laws. According to the Bombay High Court, a joint Hindu family consists of all persons lineally descended from one common ancestor and includes their wives and unmarried daughters. Jointness is the fundamental feature of this kind of family. However, the interpretation of this kind of jointness is not to be conceived in literary sense. One may say that mere staying together can constitute the status of joint-ness. The meaning, however, is far wider. The family is treated as joint not only with reference to the estate but also with regard to food and worship. Following are certain principles for the purpose of determining the jointness of any Hindu family:  Until the contrary is proved, every Hindu family is assumed to be joint in terms of food, worship and estate. Mere living separately does not breach this jointness. Though it may be a relevant factor towards proving the state of separated but however it is not a conclusive one. Once, a family is regarded as joint, then in absence of any clear-cut separation, the presumption of jointness remains intact. This indeed is a very strong presumption and it favours the brothers who are continuing with the state of being joint. The burden of proof lies on the person who alleges that there is a severance of the joint status. In case of a partition already taken place, the general presumption would be that the joint status is no more available. However, at that time, if there is someone alleging that some part of the property is still existing in the undivided form then the burden shall be upon the person who alleges the existence of such unpartitioned property. When a joint family continues to hold property jointly then such property shall be…

    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics