Preview

Alford Plea Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
392 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Alford Plea Case Study
In 2011, the West Memphis Three “were released after being resentenced to [time served] (Shargel, 2011).” Echols had convinced the state Supreme Court to an evidentiary hearing for the new and old evidence found within the case. The three men were given the choice of an Alford Plea. They were allowed to claim their innocence, but had to plead guilty as a part of their plea bargaining. If the men chose the Alford Plea they would be set free and Damien Echols would get off death row. In August of 2011, the men sat in front of a judge and plead guilty, but loudly asserted their innocence and they were freed (Moriarty, 2012). According to a news article by Dan Nienaber (2007) on August 2006, former Minnesota Viking football player, Koren Robinson,
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of Innocence Is Irrelevant
    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analysis Of Innocence Is Irrelevant

    Yoffe uses the case of Terrance Graham to illustrate capricious and coercive nature of plea bargains. In the year of 2003, a 16-year-old young man named Terrance Graham attempted to rob a restaurant. Graham was charged as an adult facing a life sentence without parole. Graham was offered one year in jail and two additional years of probation by his prosecutor given…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jib Fowles 15 Basic Appeals Analysis
    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jib Fowles 15 Basic Appeals Analysis

    “if you don’t know what to say to help someone in need. Sometimes, it can be just enough to take the time to listen and provide a supporting shoulder to lean on.” Said by David Cunliffe. Based on the Jib Fowles’ “advertisings fifteen basic appeals “each one of these appeals has an effective meaning in this world. Based on these fifteen appeals I have chosen the fourth appeal which is “the need for guidance”. This appeal has an amazing meaning in the context of the world we live in, but each one of us have a different explanation and meaning to it. In My opinion the meaning of this appeal is to help people understand themselves in terms of personal ability, interest, motivation and potential. The need for guidance is to be protected, shielded, guided. many people need for be guided and supported by others.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CJA 394 Week 3 Individual Assignment Court Issues Analysis Paper
    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    CJA 394 Week 3 Individual Assignment Court Issues Analysis Paper

    · Assess the past, present, and future impact that victim rights laws have on court proceedings.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plea Bargain Research Paper
    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Plea Bargain Research Paper

    The three basic types of plea bargains can be summed up as: 1) Plead to a lesser offense. 2) plead guilty to receive lesser sentence. 3) plead guilty to one charge to have another dropped. If prosecutors decide to bargain, there are three main factors that play a role in whether or not to offer a bargain. The first is the seriousness of the crime. The more serious the crime, the less likely a bargain will be struck. The second factor taken into consideration before a plea bargain is offered, history. An offender’s past criminal history is taken into consideration when plea bargains are considered. The last consideration when plea bargains are being considered, strength of the prosecution’s case. If a case is weak, a plea bargain may be considered…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plea Bargain Research Paper
    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plea Bargain Research Paper

    Councilman Dennis Gallagher was accused of raping and assaulting a Queens woman. The alleged event took place on July 8, 2007. Although Councilman Gallagher said it was consensual sex, the plaintiff says otherwise. When it was brought to trail by a grand-jury preceding the judge claimed the defense team had unfairly presented their case to the grand jury. About a month from the ruling, Councilman Gallagher was offered a plea deal reducing the charges brought against him as well as future happenings. The woman, the victim in the case was upset by the offering and has said that she will make sure Gallagher gets indicted.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plea Bargains Research Paper
    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page

    Plea Bargains Research Paper

    Plea bargains are an assertion in a criminal case between the prosecutor and the respondent that ordinarily includes the litigant conceding so as to get a lesser offense or sentence. Plea bargains are frequently alluded to as truly simply building up a common affirmation of the case's qualities and shortcomings, and don't really reflect a conventional feeling of Justice. In principle, courts are glad to host the individual gatherings work out an answer independent from anyone else, yet it makes one wonder…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Free Press Vs Fair Trial Case Study
    • 4329 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Free Press Vs Fair Trial Case Study

    Case later goes to superior court and rules that initially they did not have to be released – once defendant dropped right to trial they released…

    • 4329 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis of the West Memphis Three
    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Analysis of the West Memphis Three

    One would believe that justice is found in every law and in every courtroom, and judges and jurors are the perfect tools to demonstrate such fairness on every situation. However, not all people receive fair trials regardless of gender, race, ethnic background or religion as established by the American judicial system. For example, throughout decades millions of innocent people have been accused, arrested, tortured, put to trial, and persecuted for the practice of witchcraft and Satanism. In her book Devil’s Knot: The true story of the West Memphis three, Mara Leveritt recounts the story of three eight year old boys that disappear on one night and are found dead on near by stream the following day. In her book she describes the atrocities done to this kids and gives an accurate account of all the things found in the scene and how three teenagers are accused of the crime. Although there was little evidence left at the crime scene, the investigators were able to find sufficient reasons to charge the defendants with the crime.…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Ins and Outs of Plea Bargaining
    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Ins and Outs of Plea Bargaining

    The concept of plea bargaining became a common means to resolve criminal cases in the early 1900s because not everyone that was accused of a crime had a lawyer to represent them in a trial. As the criminal justice system evolved, and there were more and more cases to prosecute, plea-bargaining was used more often so that all parties would have a faster resolution to the case, as opposed to going through a lengthy trial. The definition of plea bargaining is “the process whereby the accused and the prosecutor in a criminal case work out a mutually satisfactory disposition of the case subject to court approval [that] usually involves the defendant’s pleading guilty to a lesser offense or to only some of the counts of a multicounty indictment in return for a lighter sentence than the possible for the graver charge.” (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011, Chapter 12, Plea Bargaining and Guilty Pleas).…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federal Sentencing Case Study
    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page

    Federal Sentencing Case Study

    Spohn, C., Kim, B., Belenko, S., & Brennan, P. (2014). The direct and indirect effects of offender drug use on federal sentencing outcomes. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30(3), 549-576. doi:10.1007/s10940-014-9214-9…

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    County Courts Case Study
    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    County Courts Case Study

    According to the textbook, there is a hierarchy of courts in the judiciary system. All the courts share certain functions, however they also vary in their responsibilities.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Justice Anthony Kenned Case Analysis
    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Justice Anthony Kenned Case Analysis

    “From a moral standpoint it would be misguided to equate the failings of a minor with those of an adult.”-Justice Anthony Kennedy. In 1993, Christopher Simmons was sentenced to death when he was only 17. A series of appeals to state and federal courts were submitted but each appeal was rejected. Then, in 2002, The Missouri Supreme Court stayed Simmon’s execution while the U.S Supreme Court decided Atkins v. Virginia, where the U.S. Supreme court ruled that executing the mentally ill violated Eight and 14th Amendment prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment because majority of Americans found it cruel and unusual, the Missouri Supreme Court started to reconsider Simmon’s case. Using the reasoning from this case, the Missouri court decided…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Wrongful Conviction Case Study In Psychology
    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Wrongful Conviction Case Study In Psychology

    The article I selected was from a case in the state of Illinois about a man named Angel Gonzalez. Angel was charge and convicted of sexual assault and kidnapping and was sentence to 40 years in prison which he served a total of 20. He was finally exonerated in March 2015 from a crime he didn’t commit. Due to the misidentification of the victim Angel lost 20 years of his life. Luckily for him his case was opened in August 2012 by the Innocence Project which uses the most up-to-date DNA testing he was finally able to prove he was wrongly convicted. This non-profit legal organization reminds me of a show I watch every Monday night called “Conviction” which is about a unit that investigates cases of wrongful conviction but to my surprise I actually…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty Constitutionality
    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Death Penalty Constitutionality

    Unlike other types of punishment considered “usual,” the death sentence is irreversible. However, there are many cases of prisoners who were sentenced to death row and were later exonerated for false evidence, witnesses lying on the stand, etc. In one case, Cameron Willingham was convicted of murdering his three children by arson in a 1991 house fire. He was executed in 2004. But a new report from a national arson expert, prepared for the Texas Forensic Science Commission, had concluded that the original investigation of Willingham's case was seriously flawed and could not support a finding of arson (Mills, 2009). In January 2016, the federal Supreme Court deemed Florida’s capital sentencing law to be unconstitutional because “the Sixth Amendment requires a jury, not a judge, to find each fact necessary to impose a sentence of death” (Eckholm, 2016). Cases like that of Florida are not uncommon; while the jury votes on the case as a whole, each jury member is unlikely to have agreed on the veracity of each individual piece of evidence. Furthermore, modern day forensics and technologies are constantly uncovering new ways to gather evidence that can be presented by in a court case. A simple DNA test could exonerate someone who was found guilty eighty years ago, before such…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Modern Pleading Standards
    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Modern Pleading Standards

    The assumption standard does not meet modern pleading standards because it allows plaintiffs to present a claim that is missing an essential element of due process. An initial question is what are modern pleading standards? Pleadings standard in the modern era have become stricter and require plaintiffs to show more than they might have in the past. In two cases, Ashcroft v. Iqbal and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly , the Supreme Court expanded the scope of pleading requirements. The Supreme Court held that “[t]o survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to “state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” The Court went on to state “[a] claim has facial plausibility when…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics