Preview

Alexander The Great's Efficiency In The Battle Of Gaugamela

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
286 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Alexander The Great's Efficiency In The Battle Of Gaugamela
The learner believes the strategic efficiency which Alexander the Great fought the Battle of Gaugamela was the primary reason he was able to be victorious. He came up with a strategic plan using the resources available to him to fulfill the objective of winning the battle.
The story of the Battle of Gaugamela was between Darius of Persia and Alexander the Great of Macedon which took place 331 B.C.E. (Nassar, 2007). Darius was well informed about his enemy, chose and prepared the battle ground and outnumbered his opponent four to one. Alexander’s efficient and effective battle plan would overcome his lack of resources (Nassar, 2007). Alexander the Great is knowingly famous for being a great leader and conquering the Persian Empire.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Battle Of Thermopylae Research Paper
    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Battle Of Thermopylae Research Paper

    The Battle of Thermopylae started out in the late summer of 480 B.C, the Spartan King Leonidas 1 held out for three days with a mere 300 hoplites against thousands upon thousands of the best Great King’s troops. Under thirty-five Persian generals, were assembled for the invasion of Greece, five whom where sons of the royal house. On the arrival of Xerxes at Thermopylae, he saw the that place was defended by a large of number of Spartans, and about seven thousand hoplites from other states, commanded by the Spartan King Leonidas.…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Battle Of Thermopylae Research Paper
    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Battle Of Thermopylae Research Paper

    The Battle of thermopylae was an important battle for both the persian and greek army, the leader of the persian fleet was Xerxes whose army was far more larger than King Leonidas, leader of the Greek army, but Leonidas was a far more tactical and smarter war general than Xerxes.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why were the greeks defeated at Thermoplyae
    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why were the greeks defeated at Thermoplyae

    The battle of Thermopylae was the first between the Persians and Greeks during the Persian invasion of 480-479 BC. The Greek force was very small but was determined to make a stand against the huge Persian army. The battle of Thermopylae resulted in a massive loss to the Greeks as the Persian army heavily defeating them.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Alexander's Tactics After The Battle Of Gaugamela
    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander's Tactics After The Battle Of Gaugamela

    Following the Battle of Gaugamela, Alexander planned on deploying the same tactics used against the Persians during the battle in Issus. In reply, his generals disagreed with repeating that tactic as it would put Alexander in danger, it would leave the left and center unit weaken against Persian, and purpose that Alexander take the fight towards Darius together with his army. Alexander opposed to his general’s idea as he was very firmed on his own belief and reassured his generals that if he is able to immediately take out Darius again like at Issus (Yenne 73). The battle would be over as his non-Persian soldiers would have no motives to fight any more if their ruler had abandoned them. Hence, Alexander and his army marched out onto Gaugamela…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    How Did Alexander Win The Battle Of Gaugamela
    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Did Alexander Win The Battle Of Gaugamela

    Alexander was tempted to chase after Darius, but with his camp being raided and Parmenion surrounded, Alexander ordered his troops back. He then aided to Parmenion and slaughtered the Persians who were coming back from raiding his camp (“Battle of Gaugamela”). With exemplary leading, strategic planning, and patience, Alexander had earned one of the most decisive and stunning victories…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Was Alexander The Great Effective
    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page

    Was Alexander The Great Effective

    The writer agrees with Denise that Alexander the Great led his troops to win several battles .However, the writer believes that Alexander the Great was both effective and efficient in this battle by the way he used his strategy and planning against King Darius troops.…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alexander The Great Tactics
    • 98 Words
    • 1 Page

    Alexander The Great Tactics

    The Indian campaign of Alexander the Great began in 326 BC. After conquering the Achaemenid Empire of Persia, Alexander launched a campaign into India. To deal with the ever-changing military, cultural, and economic landscape, he planned meticulously, he analyzed every piece of information and formulated as many alternatives as possible, to help the world. He built an empire that was no more than 40,000 men. Toward that end, he used tactics, mobility, and weaponry—including the formidable Macedonian phalanx—to overcome his opponents. he was able to recruit indigenous professionals into his governmental structure and leverage their skill and…

    • 98 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To What Extent Was Alexander Really Great
    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To What Extent Was Alexander Really Great

    Alexander was a great leader even though some people commonly think that he was a sword wielding tyrant. Alexander was a great leader because he respected the beliefs of other people, had a great respect for knowledge, and he was a superior strategist in battle. He was so great that he was almost able to conquer the whole known world.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Successful Is Alexander The Great?
    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Successful Is Alexander The Great?

    Well, our opinion is that Alexander the Great is great. He was attacked by the Persian and he successfully defeated them. Alexander moved south along the eastern Mediterranean. Many cities surrender the Alexander the Great. Some of the men that was in the other armies that they were in, transferred to Alexander’s army. In 332 B.C.E Alexander entered the world of egypt, a country that had experienced on and off periods of Persian rule for two centuries. With Mediterranean and Egypt secured, the Persians were deprived of naval bases and Alexander was free to move inland to conquer the eastern half of the Persian Empire. Alexander had sources of 1 million troops to take over states and cities. Darius III on the other hand brought soldiers all over and even beyond his empire. Persian was on a rampage and Alexander continued to battle against them until they…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq
    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    Alexander was great because of his intelligence. In document B it states the story behind the last superior battle Alexander fought and how he used his intelligence to strike at the enemy Prince Porous.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Did Alexander The Great Lead To The Downfall Of Alexander The Great?
    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Did Alexander The Great Lead To The Downfall Of Alexander The Great?

    He had the courage and the will to do what no other king has done.His courage contributed greatly to his success hence the name, Alexander The Great. In the Background Essay, it claims that Alexander set off to conquer Persia almost right after he inherited the throne. Most people might think that he was stupid and that he was a madman to try and achieve that. But he did it, he took down the Persian army. Alexander The Great’s legacy spread Hellenization throughout the known world at the time. Hellenization is the spread of Greek culture and language, culture and population. It took a lot of courage and self esteem to be able to spread the Greek language among the conquered lands because he didn’t know if the people would hate it or not be he did it anyway. He could have faced rejection. At the end of it all, Alexander had courage like no other…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Accuracy
    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alexander The Great Accuracy

    When observing the qualities of a person, usually what are taken in account are that person’s actions. Alexander the Great, possibly one of the greatest war generals/kings of all time, was a gifted young man for his tactical strategies for battle. Through his victories and successes, he conquered a majority of the world. Plutarch writes a biography on Alexander, in which he includes his own views, which may or may not agree with other historians (though Plutarch’s accuracy may not be considered 100% seeing as he was alive a very long time after the king of Macedonia was dead), about Alexander: he was strong, confident, and audacious.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Influence
    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Alexander The Great Influence

    Furthermore, Alexander was very smart because, he accepted the offer of Ada and established her as queen of all Caria and Halicarnassus to sustain his power. In 333 B.C, he fought against Darius in the Battle of Issus and defeated him in that battle and forced him to flee. Alexander keeps expanding his region based on his well-trained army and their support .In 332 B.C, he wins siege of Tyre and attacks Gaza and shows his dominance to other kings. By 331 B.C, Alexander found new city called Alexandria and won battle of Gaugamela against Darius. As a result, Alexander’s claim to be king of Persia was sealed with blood and iron (Roberts0). In between, there was tension growing in his empire, Cletius was military commander and saved Alexander’s life in battle of Gaugamela started talking inappropriate about Alexander’s family in drunk condition. Due to Claudius’s bad comment on Alexander’s mother, Alexander killed Cletius and felt regret afterwards.(Robert 86) . After Alexander’s capture in 327 B.C. of Sogdian Rock, a teenager daughter names Roxanne came there and he fell in love at first sight. Afterwards, Alexander and Roxanne had a traditional wedding. Furthermore, having conquered Persia heartland, Alexander goes eastward and fought for seven years. He kept expanding his region by not only pushing his army eastern parts…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Legacy
    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander The Great Legacy

    Alexander the Great is often thought of as the greatest military commander that the world has ever seen. He was born in July of 356 B.C to King Philip II of Macedonia and Olympias. Since his youth, Alexander was tutored and trained by great philosophers such as Aristotle and Leonidas. His legacy of greatness started with the taming of the wild horse, Bucephalus. Alexander of Macedonia is worthy of the title, Great, due to his strategic military operations, his expansion of the Greek Empire, and the cultural diffusion of the Greeks across the world.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Legacy
    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander The Great Legacy

    The Persian empire at its peak has long been seen as one of the largest wholes during the classical era, and few have rivaled its size. The land that Alexander the Great was able to conquer, however, was one of the few that served as an appropriate challenge. Around the time of 338 B.C.E through 323 B.C.E., Alexander's collected mass was a whole. Of a Greek origin, Alexander was taught by Aristotle, the great philosopher, and it can be inferred that he used the strategic methods learned, among other things, to assist him during his expansion. It was short lived, however, when he died of an unknown cause at an early age of thirty-three. Even though his empire crumbled, his legacy lived on. Multiple cities, strongly influenced by Alexander, erected,…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics