Alexander The Great Research Paper

The Conquests of Alexander the Great The general assumption of Alexander the Great is that he was a conqueror and was in charge of the destruction of the Persian Empire. This leader and achiever succeeded in plenty other aspects to create the conqueror he became over time. Thus, Alexander the Great was an average youthful child who was born in Pella, Macedonia where he later became emperor. The support from other scholars has helped prove the importance of him and his conquests. Macedonia is the place in which Philip derived from which he turned over his ruling to Alexander the Great. Macedonia was considered one of the four Hellenistic kingdoms under the Antigonid dynasty. In relation to Macedonia before and during Alexander the Great’s
In comparison, the empire of Macedonia has its differences due to Alexander. It seemed under control, yet free living, which comes to show that it was left in good hands with Alexander the Great leaving it under prime circumstances.
Before Alexander could bring forth is efforts to conquer a multitude of places, he had to have his strong background and sense of self. “Various charming anecdotes about Alexander’s early life are preserved in Plutarch, illuminating Alexander’s precocious nature, intelligence and love of learning, bravery, and undoubted destiny to rule” 1 These traits brought this conqueror to qualify him as a great leader. In relation to his success, he obtained bravery and determination to assist in his conquests. The battles in which he defeated the opposing side include a variety due to his overall destruction of the Persian Empire. The Battle of Chaeronea consisted of the Macedonian army crushing Greek allies in 338 B.C. The Battle of Issus turned into a rout where Darius escaped Alexander and entered Babylon where he then proceeded to the Persian capitals at Susa and Persepolis and took possession over gold and silver.2 The Battle of Hydaspes River was a brutally
Alexander the great risked a lot by putting much effort to destroy the Persian Empire. “There is no doubt that Alexander was taking a chance in attacking the Persian Empire. Although weakened in some respects, it was still a strong state.” 11 The attack at the Granicus River in 334 B.C. was a very bloody battle that induced a lot of troublesome factors. Based on Alexander’s success as a whole, “Historians, both ancient and modern, generally agree that Alexander was an outstanding military leader.” 12 Alexander simply was able to plan out new tactics quick enough to adapt to changing situations. Wounded in battle plenty of times, even more than the typical fighter, he still pushed forward and moved