Preview

Alexander Ii: Liberator or Traditionalist?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
542 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Alexander Ii: Liberator or Traditionalist?
Alexander II: Liberator or Traditionalist?

During the Tsarist reign of Alexander II (1855 – 1881), Alexander implemented a number of reforms that were destined to change the Russian social system. These reforms were the result of Russia’s humiliating military defeat in the Crimean war, as it awakened Alexander to the need for far reaching reforms in order to bring Russia up-to-date with the rest of Europe. However as these reforms were implemented a number of social and political issues arose which resulted in the death of Alexander before he could accomplish his dream of a modernised Russia. But was modernising Russia really Alexander’s intention? Did he really deserve the title ‘Liberator’?

The first and perhaps most ambitious reform to be attempted by Alexander was the emancipation of the serfs. In the words of Alexander II at the end of the Crimean war: “It is better to abolish serfdom from above than to wait until it abolishes itself from below”. The Tsar had hoped that landlords would take the initiative in the matter of the abolition of serfdom, but by 1857 when they had shown no inclination to do so, a committee was formed to consider the matter.

The committee consisted of the Tsar, high-ranking government officials and a very limited amount of private landowners. The resolutions formed within the committee were finally put into place when the Tsar signed the Ukase, abolishing serfdom in 1861. While the abolishing of serfdom sounds like liberation, some of the conditions of this reform are almost contradictory. For example, “Rights of land ownership were to be conferred upon the village community, of which the peasant proprietor was a member, NOT upon the individual peasant.” Hence the result of this reform was “The peasant, although free, was still tied to the land through his communal membership.” Meaning the reform still technically carried the Russian tradition of workers being bound to the land on which they worked. So how could Alexander be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Crimean war had highlighted the inadequacies in the Russian military. An example of this would be the lack of war materiel, such as rifles. The Crimean conflict had gone from bad to worse for the Russian military. The largely serf conscript army of the Empire, was poorly trained and poorly disciplined, this led to a number of mass desertions from the battle grounds, with almost The siege of Sevastopol was a sad and crippling defeat for the Russian empire, losing more than a 5th of its forces in the region. Alexander saw this as a triumph for the free troops of Britain and France, and a humiliating defeat for his conscripted and enslaved army. The Crimean war had also led to the eventual realisation that technological inferiority on the side of the Russians led to their defeat, The minister, Dmitri Milyutin, is described as stating quite bluntly, that “Russia must modernise, and it must build railways”. This is also a reference to the multitude of supply problems endured by the military, due to the lack of sufficient infrastructure such as railways. This makes the Crimean war a contributing factor to the Emancipation of the serfs, which defined Alexander II as a reformer.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After the war in 1856 Nicholas's son Alexander II decided to move Russia toward modern needs and social changes. Alexander believed that his reforms would allow Russia to compete with western Europe for world power. The first of Alexander's reform was an official order for freeing the serfs in 1861. However, putting an end to serfdom only went halfway. Instead of individual peasants, peasant communities were given about half the farmland in the country, nobles kept the other half and the government paid the wealthy people for their land. However, each peasant community had 49 years to pay the government for the land it had received. Therefore, while the serfs were legally free the money that was owed still tied them to the land. Political and…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another thing that had changed in Alexander III’s reign to make Russia seem unrecognisable in 1894 compared with 1881 was that the idea of reform was strongly opposed by him so Russia appeared to moving backwards instead of forwards in all aspects. Alexander III introduced a Manifesto that stated that the Tsar would be in charge of all political power. It presented a very conservative Russia where political and social stability was to be controlled and supported by autocracy, Russian nationalism and the Russian Orthodox Church. This shows how Russia had changed to become recognisable in 1894 because any idea of a constitution was rejected by the Tsar and represented Conservative ideas in his decision making. Russia…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All state leaders across the whole period held qualities that didn’t please the whole of the population in Russia. During the reign of Alex II, the government showed some strength with controlling opposition from the peasantry through the emancipation of the serfs in 1861. It was thought that to prevent revolt from below, this was a key movement that had to be made, and therefore prevented future unrest and opposition. However, the new liberated serfs had to deal with more laws concerning land ownership with led to further unrest and repression in the peasantry by the state. The state moreover, appeased the most vocal critics but in such a way that allowed dissenters to express themselves in the knowledge that Tsar’s decision would be final. Compared to Nicholas II’s reign, this showed a decisive leading technique, as Nicholas’s style was more conservative, and showed weakness, relying on others’ advice to fuel his decisions. A key failure throughout his period was the mixed rule attempt with the Duma introduced from 1906 to 1917, it is arguable that Nicholas II made concessions only to keep opposition temporarily at bay and that his aim was to uphold the principle of autocracy.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alexander ll recognized as the Tsar liberator was known mostly for the emancipation of the serfs. Serfs were the biggest social problem Russia faced as 80% of the population were serfs or state peasants. Serfdom had existed elsewhere in Europe in the 19th century but 1885 Russia was the only major power which kept serfdom. Eventually in 1861 Alexander ll issued an imperial decree which abolished serfdom. This was a huge step for Russia in the 19th century as it showed that they trying to do something about their progression in time. However this did not mean that former serfs were…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | * The land given to the peasants was not of good quality, the peasants also had to pay the state long term installments. The peasants were also responsible to the village commune that forced them to pay their installments and not be free of the land. * The local assemblies couldn’t attain much because of the interruption of bureaucrats afraid that it would turn into a self –government. * Alexander’s reform policies led to increasing reform movements that led to a populist group assassinating him, making his son turn against any reform and go back to repression. His reform policies also set the foundation for the fall of Russia’s Monarchy in 1917.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alexander ll was seen to be liberal in the early years of his reign as seen in the emancipation of the Serfs in 1861. This gave the Serfs more freedom and basic rights which at this time was a major liberal reform compared to the majority of the previous Tsars, this was by in large Alexander’s greatest reform. The emancipation, he hoped, would lead to greater agricultural output in order to finance the railways, and the beginning of the…

    • 3481 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even from a young age Alexander had strongly opposed the opinions of his father, joining the ‘party of action’ in the debate concerning war with Turkey when Alexander II was all in favour of keeping the peace. This attitude he emulated with his counter-reforms where he made it very clear that Russia would remain firmly an autocracy, and that advisors were simply there only to advise. The ministers in favour of his father’s governmental reforms were made to resign which, alongside his counter-reforms, made very clear to all his intentions to take Russia back to a firmly Tsar-run state.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first way the Russian state was more stable in 1881 was the increased freedom of the serfs. Serfdom was abolished in 1861, and although the serfs were not completely free, this was a major step for Russia, and helped them catch up to the western countries. This made the state more stable, because it briefly caused a decrease in the number of occasions of peasant unrest, which had been increasing before the decree was passed. It was hoped that the emancipation of the serfs would mean the peasants were free to leave the land they had been previously bound to, but there were many rules that came with the emancipation decree, which made it hard for the peasants to leave, and also to increase their wealth, due to one rule saying they must pay the landlords labour service of two years before they were truly free.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first measure he took shortly after he came to power was to emancipate the serfs in order to modernise Russia and finally bring social stability after years of chaos and fighting to keep up with the West. The Emancipation Edict was passed in 1861 but was better known as the “Great Disappointment” due to the fact that state serfs had to wait until 1866 to be freed, and as a result of the redemption tax serfs had to pay back to their former owners for the loss of labour and as payment for the allotments they received at emancipation. The serfs also could not keep the land they had worked - day and night – on and ended up getting bad quality land most of the time as their former owners kept the fertile, good quality land, and this unfair distribution of land led to even more hostility and disappointment. Mirs were set up to provide uniformity and stability. They were responsible for the allocation of land and they had special village courts, which ensured that the peasants remained separate and denied the full equality of other citizens, despite supposedly being “free”.…

    • 722 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Some may argue that Emancipation was an ultimately successful endeavour as it brought about both fundamental and necessary change, and whilst it is true that there were various factors that ensured the development of Russia from a backward thinking and archaic nation that relied very much on what was -in flourishing western countries – a repressive and outdated feudal system, the ill-considered and very evidently selfish way in which this much needed reform was executed meant that despite some factors, from which the development and modernisation of Russia’s class system itself were enabled, for Alexander II were exactly the opposite of what he had been attempting to achieve, in increasing his chances of retaining power by preventing revolution and furthering Russia’s position within the world. For this reason it is difficult to claim Emancipation was a success in terms of what the clearly power-conscious Tsar set out to accomplish, when many of its key aspects were redundant and others provided a catalyst for consideration of concepts of political activism or further revolution, an unwanted and unanticipated advancement,…

    • 2133 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great is often thought of as the greatest military commander that the world has ever seen. He was born in July of 356 B.C to King Philip II of Macedonia and Olympias. Since his youth, Alexander was tutored and trained by great philosophers such as Aristotle and Leonidas. His legacy of greatness started with the taming of the wild horse, Bucephalus. Alexander of Macedonia is worthy of the title, Great, due to his strategic military operations, his expansion of the Greek Empire, and the cultural diffusion of the Greeks across the world.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Persian empire at its peak has long been seen as one of the largest wholes during the classical era, and few have rivaled its size. The land that Alexander the Great was able to conquer, however, was one of the few that served as an appropriate challenge. Around the time of 338 B.C.E through 323 B.C.E., Alexander's collected mass was a whole. Of a Greek origin, Alexander was taught by Aristotle, the great philosopher, and it can be inferred that he used the strategic methods learned, among other things, to assist him during his expansion. It was short lived, however, when he died of an unknown cause at an early age of thirty-three. Even though his empire crumbled, his legacy lived on. Multiple cities, strongly influenced by Alexander, erected,…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Nationwide Revolution

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The first reason for the revolution in 1905 was the developments in the Russian countryside and how they produced a general unhappiness among the landowners and even the peasants. A long-term social and economic cause was the continuing dissatisfaction of both these groups to the Emancipation reform of Alexander II in 1861. The Landowners did not approve of the act because it denied them the free labour they had access to before the emancipation of the serfs. They had lost their free labour and large amounts of their land. By 1905 many of the Landowners were facing large debts. Although the act did end serfdom in Russia, the peasants were still angry due to the redemption payments they were expected to pay and the poor quality of land they received. They also disliked the fact that they were still tied to the…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, Alexander II wanted to ensure that the autocracy will survive, have full power and don't pass any power to the public. His reforms were designed to modernize autocracy instead of creating an alternative system that would suit the Russian people as the country was in a very poor state. However, his reforms faced a lot of opposition and therefore led to his being unable to restrain forces that were pushing him towards a change. One of his main pushes towards modernisation was the abolition of serfdom.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays