Preview

Airbus from Challenger to Leader

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6921 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Airbus from Challenger to Leader
CARPCS11_013145353x.QXD

Case

1/18/06

8:41 AM

Page 508

11

“In prior years we found customers somewhat cautious about supporting Airbus. This year it has become acceptable and, frankly, even stylish to laud Airbus and to chastise Boeing.”
–Excerpt from Bear Stearns Analyst Report as reported in Fortune in August 1999
“We are not here to buy market share.”
–Noel Forgeard, Chairman, Airbus Industrie, in August 1999

Airbus—From Challenger to Leader
BSTR/046
BOEING’S NIGHTMARE
In October 2002, The Seattle Times, a local newspaper published from Seattle, USA, where Boeing is headquartered, carried a headline story, Boeing Is Slipping to No. 2. According to the newspaper report, Boeing’s sole competitor,
Airbus Industrie (Airbus) had bagged an order from easyJet1 for 120 A-319 jets. easyJet was one of Boeing’s most loyal customers (Refer [to] Exhibit 1 for a profile of Boeing).
Analysts felt that after easyJet’s shift away from Boeing, other low-cost airlines would follow suit in opting for Airbus.
Airbus seemed all set to take market leadership in the low cost segment from Boeing for the first time. From the mid1990s onwards, Airbus had steadily increased its market

share. By the late 1990s, Boeing and Airbus had an equal share in the market.
Rival Boeing accused Airbus of resorting to heavy price cutting in order to beat off the competition. It also accused Airbus of producing aircraft for which it had not received orders and creating a glut in the market. But Airbus rejected the allegations, saying that it was in the market to make money and not to buy market share. Some analysts were of the opinion that Airbus was able to increase its marketshare because of the financial support it received from its consortium partners. However, others attributed
Airbus’ success to its fuel-efficient jets, which were economical to run.

THE TAKEOFF
This case was written by K. Subhadra, under the direction of Sanjib Dutta, ICFAI Center



References: 1. Healy, Tim, Competition: Battle for Asia, www.asiaweek.com, March 29, 1996. 2. Can Airbus Partners Unite? BusinessWeek, July 22, 1996. 3. Edmondson, Gail & Browder, Seanna, Angst at Airbus, BusinessWeek, December 23, 1996. 4. Edmondson, Gail & Browder, Seanna, A Wake Up Call for Airbus, BusinessWeek, December 30, 1996. 5. Peace in Our Time, The Economist, July 24, 1997. 6. Guyon, Janet, The Sole Competitor, Fortune, January 12, 1998. 7. Henkoff, Ronald, Boeing’s Big Problem, Fortune, January 12, 1998. 8. Edmondson, Gail, Up, Up, and Away at Last for Airbus? BusinessWeek, February 9, 1998. 9. Airbus Highflier Grounded, BusinessWeek, February 2, 1998. 10. Hubris at Airbus, Boeing Rebuilds, The Economist, November 26, 1998. 11. Boeing Admits It “Let Clients Down,” www.news.bbc.co.uk, September 8, 1998. 12. Fearful Boeing, The Economist, February 25, 1999. 13. Taylor, III Alex, Blue Skies for Airbus, Fortune, August 2, 1999. 14. Edmondson, Gail, Overhauling Airbus, BusinessWeek, August 2, 1999. 16. Airbus Gets a Boost, The Economist, April 6, 2000. 17. Rivals in the Air, www.news.bbc.co.uk, June 23, 2000. 18. Airbus Steals Boeing Ground, www.news.bbc.co.uk, November 30, 2000. 19. Useem, Jerry, Boeing vs Boeing, Fortune, October 2, 2000. 20. Airbus Draws First Blood, www.news.bbc.co.uk, June 18, 2001. 21. Matlack, Carol & Holmes, Stanley, Trouble Ahead for Airbus? BusinessWeek, October 1, 2001. 22. Bettering Boeing, The Economist, July 18, 2002. 23. Holmes, Stanley, Showdown at 30,000 Feet, BusinessWeek, July 22, 2002. 24. Airbus Just May Win This Dogfight, BusinessWeek, August 5, 2002. 25. Bashing Boeing, The Economist, October 17, 2002. 26. Matlack, Carol & Holmes, Stanley, Look Out, Boeing, BusinessWeek, October 28, 2002. 27. Boeing vs Airbus, The Economist, April 17, 2003. 28. Boeing Can Assemble 7E7 in 72 Hours, The Economic Times, June 6, 2003.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Another aspect of a marketing strategy should have been safety and consumer choice. Airbus was noted to have a system that not all pilots trust “Fly-by-the-wire,” causing planes to malfunction and plunge 100s of feet in seconds (Bland, 2009). Both of these factors can play a major role in how many passengers choose to fly with one airline company over another because of the aircraft used. Had either of the manufacturers used these two simple areas in their marketing strategy the negotiation outcome could have been…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Airbus Case Analysis

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Reasons that Airbus interested in A3XX  A Revolution Adventure -- The first objective of this project is to fill the market gap by introducing a new type of aircraft. Airbus, with A3XX under the plan, is stepping into an area that Boeing has rarely touched, the very large aircraft (VLA) market. If Airbus well forecasts the future market, A3XX will be the flagship in a new airline revolution. Capturing more than half the VLA market with A3XX, Airbus would constitute an enormous financial success and achieve the ultimate objective-- the leader of commercial aviation industry.  Abundant Financial Resources and Developed Technologies -- Airbus possesses abundant funding resources and cutting-edge technologies which could substantially reduce the training cost. Airbus was prepared to receive around $4 billion development loans from the British, French, German and Spanish governments, repayable from sales revenue. Together with contributions from risk-sharing partners and its own shareholders, Airbus has no need to worry about its financial resources and thus can concentrate on the production and sale of A3XX. In addition, the well-developed aircraft technologies such as fly-by-wire technology, fight deck design, and performance characteristics that are common across the Airbus family pave the way for the A3XX’s development and potential market.  Favorable factors from Context Analysis -- Needs for travelling and cargo transportation are essential parameters which airlines have to take into consideration; hence, they are also vital determinants of demand for commercial aircrafts. According to Airbus’s Global Market Forecast (GMF), air transportation industry is expected to grow at 4.9% annually. This continuous growth demand of the flight market can offer Airbus Company a sound support to launch new types of planes. In…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During the 1996-2000 period, Europe-based Airbus boosted its global market share in the over-100-seat airplane market from 21 percent to nearly 50 percent (Matlack et al., 2001). The March 6, 2001 issue of The Wall Street Journal reported (Michaels, 2001): From its base in France, Airbus has eaten steadily into the home market of U.S. aerospace icon Boeing Co. over the past decade, and it hopes to keep biting off market share. Today, almost 10 percent of the big commercial jets flying around the U.S.…

    • 2365 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Boeing Paper

    • 37585 Words
    • 151 Pages

    This paper will first attempt to explain the legal structure of Boeing and then describe any historical, present, or future litigation Boeing is engaged in. Then the paper will detail the business and analyze its strategic situation. This section will focus on Boeing’s core competency and use the five forces framework to analyze its strategic position. The third second of this paper will discuss Boeing’s marketing strategy as well as detail their competition and how they differentiate themselves in the marketplace. The fourth section will analyze Boeing’s principal accounting statements and prepare a valuation for Boeing. It will also attempt to assess Boeing’s financial performance and standing relative to its past performance and that of its competitors. The next section will cover a research…

    • 37585 Words
    • 151 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Boeing was founded in 1916 by William Boeing. The company started by making small seaplanes with low top speeds. The first customer of Boeing was the New Zealand government. They used the planes for the countries mail, and to train pilots. The real pay-off was when the United States entered World War I and ordered a large amount of seaplanes. Between World War I and II, they became one of largest manufacturers by supplying the Air force with fighter planes. Skipping ahead to 1985, we see the start of record breaking sales for six years in a row. By 1992 Boeing had employed 150,000 people with net earnings of 1.55 billion dollars. But, in 1994 they had to cut those 150,000 employees to 126,000, and earnings down to 856 million. An economic slowdown, the Gulf War, competitors, and outdated business models were all contributors to this downturn.…

    • 1914 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Boeing Weaknesses

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Boeing has been in business for over 60 years, and has been a frontrunner in international aviation since its inception. By now, the company has accumulated enough assets to immediately bounce back from financial minor crises. Essentially, this is a company that will be around for a while.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research Paper On Boeing

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    William E. Boeing was a man that founded the Boeing Company on July 15, 1916, in Seattle, Washington. William E. Boeing made a timber company in seattle before founding Pacific Aero Products Co, which would eventually be named…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After sucessfully selling military aircrafts adapted for troop transportation in the 1950’s and introducing commercial aircrafts model 707, 727 followed by 737, Boeing has since then become a leading producer of military & commercial aircraft.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Even though the support was really helping Airbus in strengthening its position in the market, it is also create an issue of unfair government intervention. Boeing the competitor of Airbus and the U.S. government have long complained about the massive subsidies and soft loans that were responsible for Airbus birth and its success. This issue is worsened when Airbus surpassed Boeing in becoming the world’s leading aircraft manufacturer. In 2005, the U.S. Trade Representative brought its case to the WTO because of approval of $3.7 billion subsidies and soft loan from EU to Airbus. The case alleged the financial aid is qualified as subsidies under WTO’s Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (ASCM). Under ASCM, subsidies to specific firms or industries…

    • 2942 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boeing 747 and Airbus

    • 632 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Despite the gains in the market share, Airbus still did not have a product to compete with Boeing’s 747 in the VLA market. Airbus wants to break the monopoly of the 747.…

    • 632 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boeing vs. Airbus

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I think that the subsidies and soft loans provided to Airbus are unfair and provide them with an unfair competitive advantage. Airbus is given aid from Britain, Spain, France, Germany, and the European Union. These countries’ governments are responsible not only for providing the funding that created Airbus, but also for funding its ongoing success. In fact, government aid is responsible for the creation of all their aircraft models. With this kind of support, it is nearly impossible for Airbus to fail. I feel as if these European governments have gone too far in helping Airbus succeed. It’s one thing to help a company start up, but continually infusing money into a company guaranteeing its success provides unfair advantages over other companies, such as Boeing, that have been able to sustain without such drastic help. The extensive financial assistance has allowed Airbus to quickly gain market share and outsell Boeing. Thus, Airbus has been able to grow and profit while Boeing has had no other choice but to sit back and watch Airbus take over the commercial aircraft industry—the industry Boeing had led for decades.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Boeing vs Airbus

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * Doesn’t make sense for Boeing because market isn’t there (need 400 to break even yet market size is capped at 300)…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Airbus is building a new support strategy where customers pay for a significant portion of purchased services with data collected during operations. In a press briefing last December at the aircraft manufacturer's headquarters in Toulouse, France, executives from Airbus's customer services team explained that rather than becoming a standalone business unit, integrated customer support can help make Airbus airplanes more attractive. In addition, they outlined plans to create a network of MRO (maintenance, repair, and overhaul) providers, and gave an extensive description of Airbus "e-solutions" for maintenance.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Airbus is one of the divisions of EADS parent company particular in aerospace defence. The purpose of Airbus division is to develop, manufacture, market and sell commercial jet aircraft known as Airbus. Is the biggest competitors of Boeing and Bombardier (factivia 2010) and leading market share 64%. The main focus of this report will be on Airbus 's critical success factors. By using Bowman 's Strategic clock, which identifies customer perception and strategy choices of airbus. By describing resources and capability this report will establish whether the current strategy works against future competition.…

    • 3531 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In our opinion the subsidies and soft loans provided to Airbus are unfair and provide them with an unfair competitive advantage. Airbus has achieved aid from the European Union. Governments of these countries are responsible not only for providing the funding, but also for funding its ongoing success. In fact, government’s aid is responsible for the creation of all aircraft models. With this kind of support, it is nearly impossible for Airbus to fail. Airbus gained substantially from receiving free financial support. The subsidies given to Airbus provide for research and development which results in reduced costs of production and increased knowledge of the industry.I t’s one thing to help a company start up, but continually infusing money into a company guaranteeing its success provides unfair advantages over other companies, such as Boeing, that have been able to sustain without such drastic help. The extensive financial assistance has allowed Airbus to quickly gain market share and outsell Boeing. Thus, Airbus has been able to grow and profit while Boeing has had no other choice but to sit back and watch Airbus take over the commercial aircraft industry—the industry Boeing had led for decades.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics