It is very clear that AIDS is an important health problem for the whole planet and specially for Africa.This kind of problems need the attention of all the factors with responsibilities in public health,starting with the governments but,of course,continuing with the pharmaceutical companies,the nongovernmental organizations,massmedia,physicians,the church ,the red cross etc.In this big fight against AIDS we cannot let all the difficulties in the back of the pharmaceutical companies but I believe they can do more than they did and all the others can do more than they did. It is true that the pharmaceutical companies have a moral obligation to help Africa ,like everybody who has the possibilities to help in this battle against this plague-AIDS.In the same time it is true that they have legal and moral obligation to company shareholders who invested their capital(maybe the retirement money) and they are expecting return of their investment.For the development of the new drugs against AIDS the companies invested huge amounts of money in research and if they will not recover the investments by selling patented drugs,they will not invest anymore and they will not find other better solutions against AIDS and other deseases of the third millennium( a good example in this idea is MSD-Merck company,very well known as the most ethical pharmaceutical company,who was obliged to renounce to the finding of the vaccine against AIDS because they loosed too much money with the drugs against AIDS already discovered ). So,from my point of vue,the only efficient solution,and moral in the same time,is to find a middle solution,not based only on the companies but not excluding the companies.This means that if,let’s say that we can oblige all the pharmaceutical companies to renounce to the patent and to sell very cheap all the drugs (or even give them for free) to the African countries,we will not obtain the expected results:the companies will loose a lot of money and the shareholders will loose their money and nobody will invest anymore in pharma industries and there will be no R&D and no new drugs and,in the same time,at the pacient will arrive only 12% from the drugs(the rest will disappear),if there will be no clinics where to do the treatment-no good results of the treatment,if there will be no education channels,no protection against sexual and blood transmission,no hygiene and no healthy conditions to live-sure the results will be disappointing on all the lines.The middle efficient solution is to put together all the actors,under the supervision of a recognized world organization,like UN: -the African governments will do their best in organizing small clinics in the areas more affected,in accepting there is a big corruption problem and organizing at least for this purpose a militarized supervision of the distribution of the drugs,they will sustain more education programs and they will accept and sustain the nongovernmental organizations which are dealing with this and health problems
-the well developed countries ,thru their governments,will recognize that AIDS is a world problem and will allocate funds for this,from which they will help the African governments (to organize better,to develop medical clinics and to do education …)and to buy drugs from the pharmaceutical MNE,at a sponsorised lower price than the market but allowing them in the same time to make their duty to their shareholders and to develop in the future
-the big pharma companies will involve much more themselves in this big project,they will sponsor the education and the health in the poor African countries,they will offer drugs for the governments at a much lower price than the market(but not so low to loose and destroy the financial situation of the companies),they will organize programs of training and education for African health providers,they will make donations for the first affected regions and they will cooperate much better with the nongovernmental organizations
-The Red Cross,Doctors without borders,Pharmacists without borders and all other organizations nonprofit involved in the world’s planet will have to sustain this project thru all the channels and modalities they can.
A global solution like this is the only realistic solution for fighting against AIDS.
Speaking about the way that pharmaceutical multinational enterprises fulfilled their moral obligations,I think that the three norms of ethical behavior identified for knowledge-intensive MNE(non-discrimination,transparency and honestity and selfcontrol and fairness)were respected by the pharma companies in this difficult situation.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) has become an epidemic for many underdeveloped regions. Although it does exist in the developed nations, it is more prevalent in places like South America, Asia, the island countries and most heavily of all Africa. There are many aspects to the problem of AIDS in Africa.…
- 1127 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Pharmaceutical companies rely on their patents as a source of income that could be reduced by allowing generic companies to copy their drug and make it at a lower cost. If the companies’ profits are cut in half, this gives less money to them and hinders the amount of money they can contribute to the next strain of drugs necessary for those living with HIV. The money they make is used for research and development of these lifesaving drugs are included in the cost of the medication. This is why the prices of the first AIDS drug was twelve thousand dollars per year per patient when it was first released.…
- 731 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
An example of an issue with pharmaceutical drug corporations is the ethics associated with researching the drugs. For example, Pfizer caused an international scandal when they illegally tested a drug to cure meningitis in Nigeria. 11 children died due to not enough research into the effects of the drug on children. This is an ethical issue, as if Pfizer had done effective research, and received correct authorisation, those children could have been saved. Another issue with research is that drug companies only research profitable drugs. In order to stay afloat, drug companies need to produce a billion dollar drug every few years. Pfizer’s main drug is Viagra for example, which has little impact on global health, and so an issue is that drug companies spend more money researching drugs which don’t matter globally, than on diseases which affect the poorer countries.…
- 381 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Perhaps the most difficult situation in business arises when the indigent desire the product being sold. Political pressure is often put on the company to lower prices in order to accommodate the less fortunate consumer, however, this is in direct conflict with the company’s paramount goal of making the largest profit possible. Issues are increasingly complex given the supply-demand aspects of society and the incentive for production. For these reasons approaches to business that emphasize profit over availability can indeed help society in many ways. Upon the question of ethics one must view the entire market as a whole and the benefits of competition when deciding a fair price. An examination of the case study New Protocol: How Drug’s Rebirth as Treatment for Cancer Fueled Price Rises relies heavily on a keen understanding of the social and economic implications of a capitalist system, and once taken into account it is clear that Celgene Corp. is justified in raising prices based on the business market philosophies asserted by Adam Smith, Milton Friedman, Emanuel Kant, and John Locke. Celgene’s decision to raise prices is complex and…
- 1725 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
When looking at PharmaCARE’s relationship with the Colberians, you see that the company’s treatment of the indigenous population is unethical. In terms of intellectual property, the scenario in Assignment 2 highlights the exploitation of the Colberians. While the indigenous population freely shares their information about their cures, the company exploits them by not compensating them for their shared knowledge. According to labor laws, companies should work ethically and treat all of their employees fair -- not equal, but fair. Some employees, based on their position and level of responsibility, should be paid more and should receive better perks than others. However, the company is earning millions of dollars from the knowledge being shared by the healers, and its executives live in luxury with swimming pools, tennis courts, and a golf course, while the Colberians continue to live in huts without electricity or running water. If the company compensated the healers for their intellectual property, the Colberians could improve their living conditions. PharmaCARE is taking advantage of this group of stakeholders because the healers are uneducated, ignorant to intellectual property laws, and do not know the true value of the information they are sharing with PharmaCARE. According to authors S.C. Jain and R. Bird, the Trade-Related Aspect of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) is considered the most relevant intellectual property treaty, and nations that have signed on must treat foreign intellectual property rights holders the same as domestic ones (2008, p. 7). Yet, PharmaCARE failed to compensate the healers of Africa in the manner…
- 3260 Words
- 14 Pages
Better Essays -
After researching pharmaceutical companies, I quickly realized this is a very controversial topic. I’m not certain anyone in many of these companies have very many moral standards. Drug companies seemed to be very profitable from the researchers to the drug reps that deliver “gifts” and sample meds to the doctor’s offices that push their medications.…
- 656 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Society expects drug companies to improve people’s well-being and to behave like a nonprofit company not overly concerned with making large profits. However, investors expect pharmaceutical companies to earn profits making it unlikely that life-saving drugs will be sold at the lowest possible price. Some interest group is bound to be displeased with mutually exclusive expectations and the pharmaceutical industry is often criticized.…
- 3675 Words
- 15 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Unfortunately for all of us, the pharmaceutical industry, just like any other business rely on profits to be able to survive. Therefore, supply and demand is what drives everything they do, along with their profit margins. It is not hard to believe that where drug companies are concerned, profits come before ethics. In the United States we have the FDA, which is more or less of an ethical compass for our drug companies. They are the ones to decide if a drug is in a stage that can be tested on humans; dropped altogether; ready to be marketed and sold to consumers. The existence of the FDA, however, has not stopped companies from trying to maximize their profits by misusing their products-all it has done…
- 919 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
During the panic caused by Ebola, the big pharmaceutical companies didn’t even attempt to find a cure for the deadly virus. Though people may say that it was Africa’s problem, it did end up spreading into the United States. And, instead of putting effort into helping, large drug companies sat out as small biotech firms and government agencies scrambled to put a stop to Ebola. The lack of regulations on big pharmaceutical companies puts us all in danger, and leaves them free to avoid large medical emergencies if it doesn’t get them enough money in…
- 560 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
PharmaCARE Company is one of the leading world pharmaceutical companies, that enjoys an honest name of a caring and well-run company and that act ethically toward its stakeholders. It provides with the high-quality products and saves people’s lives increasing its quality. However, the case with the African nation of Colberia, where the PharmaCARE holds its big manufacturing object, raise community fears as for the unethical attitude toward the indigenous population of this land. The following paper will illustrate the main unethical considerations of the Company, will describe the key characteristics of its stakeholders, and will illustrate the human rights issues presented by PharmaCARE 's treatment. The paper will also suggest the changes that PharmaCARE can perform to be more ethical.…
- 1991 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
“Two-thirds of all people infected with HIV live in sub-Saharan Africa, although this region contains little more than 10% of the world’s population” ("The impact of HIV & AIDS on Africa", 2010, para. 1). “During 2008 alone, an estimated 1.4 million adults and children died as a result of AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa…[that is] more than 15 million Africans [who] have died from AIDS…since the beginning of the epidemic”("The impact of HIV & AIDS on Africa", 2010, para. 1). The impact that HIV/AIDS has had on this region is astounding and caused widespread human suffering. “The most obvious effect of this crisis has been illness and death, but the impact of the epidemic has certainly not been confined to the health sector; households, schools, workplaces and economies have also been badly affected” ("The impact of HIV & AIDS on Africa", 2010, para. 1). Most of these sub-Saharan countries are still in the developing stages in terms of their economies; the damage that the epidemic has done to the economy seems irreversible.…
- 2268 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Goldacre, B. (2007, August 4). Evil ways of the drug companies | Science | The Guardian . Latest US news, world news, sport and comment from the Guardian | guardiannews.com | The Guardian . Retrieved March 5, 2012, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/aug/04/sciencenews…
- 779 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
Over the course of many years, parts of Sub Saharan Africa have decreased in their population because of the STD AIDS. The African government plays a significant role in the reason behind the way AIDS has spread throughout Africa, as an epidemic. When AIDS was beginning to be well known, many African leaders did intervene and showed moral support for some time. Unfortunately, they fell short of providing adequate resources to the African people such as the drugs, better equipped hospitals and a safer country. Many other first class developed countries heard of the epidemic AIDS and the lack of help from their governments. Many of those countries did not feel the need to educate…
- 3099 Words
- 13 Pages
Good Essays -
However, it is the exact opposite for the upper class to make a significant profit when they have supplied society with a benefit that will last generations. Everyone has been there. Someone falls ill, the doctor provides them with a medical prescription from the local drug store with an insurmountable price. The average person would be quick to call the company out on their lust for a quick buck. Contrary to popular belief, many of these companies are not greedy in any way. Simply, everyone involved in the production of the prescription is looking to reap from the challenging work they have accomplished. “Bringing a single drug to market costs a major pharmaceutical company anywhere from $800 million to $1.5 billion”(Forbes 2009). In regard to the gigantic amount of profit, many think that pharmacists should not be allowed to collect such a large profit. Despite this opinion, much of the profit will go towards research for other life changing drugs. The same ideals go for similar groundbreaking industries. “The road to recovery runs through markets, not…
- 1128 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Pharmaceutical companies do have a responsibility to distribute drugs for a low cost in developing and poorer countries. Africa’s GDP, and per capita income is very low so they cannot afford to buy top quality medicines. One main argument for this approach is the AIDS epidemic in Africa. A main argument against this is that the treatment for AIDS is very expensive to provide to a whole country for free.…
- 307 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays