The death penalty was used as the ultimate punishment in the American courts, but is it necessary now? The death sentence is used when the offender killed another person with undisputed evidence. The death penalty was used more often during the early years of the United States and is even more accurate now. Even with all the modern technology we have today the death penalty is still hindered by a few factors. Death on humans is immsensely inhumane, even animals are killed at ease with no pain. The death penalty should be used less because of the murder rates are slowly dropping, Prejudice against the defendants, and the costs of the death sentence.
A reason to stop the death sentencing is because the murder rates are slowly declining. In the west region of the United States the murder rate was 5.6 murders in 2006 then dropped to 5.3 murders in 2007. In the Northeast region of the United States the murder rates were 4.5 murders per every 1000,000 in 2006 and dropped to 4.1 per 100,000 in 2007. The Murder rates are slowly dropping meaning a decreased need for the death penalty. Another reason for not using the death penalty is because of prejudice from the jury and possible the judge. The death penalty shouldn’t be used because the jury and the judge could be prejudiced against the defendant and give an unfair verdict. Many people have been accused and given a death sentence when it was found out that they were innocent years later. Giving a second chance to a criminal can mean a lot to them. They can think about what sins they have commited and are given time in a solitary confinement to straighten their path and minds. Also, Professor Brooke Butler of University of South Florida released a study showing that jurors were more inclined to the death penalty for women, homosexuals, and people of different races. Another study by Professor Scott Phillips of the University of Denver showed that the District Attorney was more likely to impose the death...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document