Preview

Against Big Game Trophy Hunting

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
611 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Against Big Game Trophy Hunting
I am against the big game trophy hunting for many reasons supported by quotes from articles about the story, TMDG. Something so small and harmless may be thought as just a hobby, but in the end, it is a hobby that affects way more. Animals and humans can both receive harm when people hunt; especially when it involves many deaths and drastic changes in someone's life. Throughout the articles I read, I found that big game trophy hunting is quite dangerous; adding to my original thought about being against it. Hunters may find success and experience when hunting, but many don’t seem to comprehend how selfish their decisions truly are. “The animals that are killed are not consumed, but are used as trophies to show off their hunting skills,” one article states. This quote shows exactly why I think hunters can be selfish because some of them just want that feeling of triumph when they kill an animal. It’s like taking a person's life right from their own eyes, and later having a plaque, to represent their life. Later in the article, it also says, “This refers to the type of …show more content…
It’s important to recognize how much of this goes on because animals play an important role in our world. To make them suffer even more than they already have to is outrageous. “Inhumane Suffering One of the most controversial aspects of hunting is the prospect that an animal may be suffering from a long and painful death,” one article says while talking about this specific issue. It comes to show that animals are greatly affected when hunters kill them. Another article heavily discusses Cecil’s death saying, “the killing of Cecil has sparked an international outcry and a backlash against big game trophy hunting.” Cecil was a lion in Zimbabwe who was the hot topic for his death and is the perfect example of the suffering of animals because he was one of many animals who experienced a death from this

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The idea of hunting to humans is when one human kills an animal for sport or for food, but we have never thought of what it would be like to be hunted ourselves. For instance, that is what happens in the story ¨The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, the protagonist Sanger Rainsford Falls off his ship and washed up on Ship-Trap Island. Rainsford then finds General Zaroff, who likes to hunt humans, and he comes to the conception that the General is a little disturbing. In that time, they come to different point of views on hunting. General Zaroff decides to hunt Rainsford on the Island, and Rainsford escape General Zaroff only to come back to him and fight him to the death. Furthermore, The theme of the story is that there is danger in…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jeremy Rifkin 's article, “A Change of Heart About Animals” argues that animals are more like humans than we imagine and as a result should be treated with the care that they deserve. Rifkin develops and supports his argument using facts about the animals and these facts end up touching hearts. In order for Rifkin to get his point across he uses a smart technique by using pathos and plays with the emotions of his audience. Rifkin loves animals and his passion and love evokes emotions that the audience can feel. Animals can feel and have emotions similar to ours. in agreement with Rifkin, I argue that it is wrong and inhumane to kill or abuse animals because they feel, they deserve to have space and should be valued as much as humans are It is wrong no animal should be killed due to abuse or testing, it is wrong and inhumane.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Cecil the Lion Killed By American Dentist” was the headline that rekindled the controversial debate over trophy hunting. This debate is better represented by Goodwell Nzou’s article “In Zimbabwe We Don’t Cry For Lions” than in the passage by Alexis Crosswell “5 Reasons Why Trophy Hunting is Not Conservation.” Trophy hunting is the killing of animals specifically for the purpose of keeping a portion of the animal as a prize. Since the death of Cecil the Lion, the sport has come under significant fire from the media and sparked heated argument. Nzou has the stronger argument than Crosswell’s specifically because: it recognizes that humans personify deadly animals, the writer of “In Zimbabwe We Don’t Cry For Lions” has personal experience with the subject and that Goodwell Nzou explains that American priorities are more concerned with animals than starving people.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doctoral student in molecular and cellular biosciences at Wake Forest University and member of the African Nzou clan, Goodwell Nzou, in his opinion contribution to the New York Times, effectively claims that trophy hunting is not as bad as Americans are making it out to be. First, he supports this claim by asserting that lions are considered killers in African villages. Nzou uses cause and effect to appeal to pathos when stating, “When I was 9 years old, a solitary lion prowled villages near my home. After it killed a few chickens, some goats and finally a cow, we were warned to walk to school in groups and stop playing outside. My sisters no longer went alone to the river to collect water or wash dishes; my mother waited for my father and older brothers, armed with machetes, axes and spears, to…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Personally, I think that the morality of hunting depends on the situation. If the hunter is strictly doing his job of providing food for his family and community, then that is fine. However, if they are doing it for the thrill and for pleasure and they aren't even going to eat what they kill, then these people need to take a moment to step back and realize that what they are doing is in no way right and they are the people giving genuine hunters a poor…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although each type of hunting involves the killing of animals; the two are different in many ways. The environmental impact and economic influence could be disturbing in both cases if certain measures fail to protect the animals from being harvested in large quantities through legal or illegal means. Poaching involves the illegal harvesting of animals for some type of personal or professional gain while trophy hunting tends to lean strictly on the side of personal gain for the thrill and adventure the individual hunter has during the hunt. Each category can entail monetary gain. The poacher may gain money through the illegal sale of his kill. The trophy hunter generally does not come out on the positive side when it comes to monetary gain since he or she must often pay a guide or hunting preserve for the opportunity to make the kill. Trophy hunting still provides an economic boost to the person or entity in charge of the…

    • 2298 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    of hunting any type of big game. Even though Rainsford is starting to realize his mistakes, he still feels like hunting is not a bad sport to participate in .…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Several questions occurred to me. Why is it that people's first reaction was not exaltation at saving a child's life, but outrage over killing an animal? Why is there more outrage about the death of Harambe the gorilla and Cecil the lion than millions of babies being aborted, or Christian's dying in Syria? Yes, it's unfortunate that the incident happened at all, or that an endangered species had to be put down, but what does it say about us?…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Snap! A twig snaps under my feet as I creep toward the deer. It flips its head toward me. Staring at me like I’m the creature of the Black Lagoon. Then, I raise my gun ever so slowly, and BAM! Its body collapses in a bloody mess. Now what do I do? Big Game Trophy Hunting is one of the many activities that we do that is extremely unnecessary, but it is most of the most dangerous. I want be able to convince you that Big Game Trophy Hunting should be outlawed due to the dangers to the environment and the decrease of sources of food.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The activity of hunting wild animals for food has long been a practice of man. It is what we as humans survived off for thousands of years. An instinctual need to pursue game is still alive in many of us. Unfortunately, those who choose to fulfill this instinct are generally condemned for their actions. Now this may not seem to be such a serious deal, but I assure you there is much more to this situation than first meets the eye. The topic of hunting is very significant because it not only affects hunter’s rights, but it affects landscape, funding wildlife preservation, and tradition.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    You’re driving home from a movie with your best friends and you’re doing about 60 on a country road you’ve known all your life. All of a sudden, out of your peripheral view, you see a couple of deer heading straight for your cars path. You hit the brake to try to avoid them and narrowly miss. You think to yourself how lucky you are that you didn’t hit one. What you didn’t know is the couple of deer you saw used to be a pack of 4 deer. A week earlier, two different hunters each took a deer from that herd. If it wasn’t for the hunters, you probably would’ve hit at least one deer. Deer hunting isn’t as bad as it is portrayed to be! Hunting controls the deer population and along with predator population and the number of accidents involving deer decrease because of good ethical hunting.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many animals endure prolonged, painful deaths when they are injured but not killed by hunters. What the author fails to consider is that most people that hunt are not hunting to just kill most are trying to feed there family or put meat in there fridge. According to peta the delicate balance of ecosystems ensures their survival if they are left unaltered. Natural predators help maintain this balance by killing only the sickest and weakest individuals. Hunters, however, kill any animal whose head they would like to hang over the fireplace including large, healthy animals who are needed to keep the population strong. Although this may be true the ecosystem is going to kill off populations a lot slower than kill animals such as deer are self, killing isn't bad if you using the deer for good causes.On private lands that are set up as for-profit hunting reserves or game ranches, hunters can pay to kill native and exotic species in “canned hunts.” This is true, but people that go out and hunt in canned hunts usually after they kill a deer they give the meat to share your harvest and help families in need.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benefits Of Hunting Essay

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Public debates about trophy hunting often centers on the question of the morality of recreational hunting or the extent to which the money paid by sportsmen seeking a trophy animal provides a conservation benefit to the overall population of game animals and the rural economies where the game is hunted. Bears, cougars, deer, foxes, and other animals who are chased, trapped, and even killed by dogs during hunts are not the only ones to suffer from this variant of the “sport.” Hunting for fun destroys property and injure or kill horses, cows, dogs, cats, hikers, and other hunters (Trophy…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Dbq

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Animals pass to many cruelties, they suffer and live a miserable life. NO animal should pass all that suffering…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    …I am not in a position to answer yes or no to the question. Considering the fact that “the law of the jungle” was contaminated by human law, I think everyone -not only mankind but all the animals- should live their lives peacefully. On the other hand, I literally eat a certain animals and think my life would be less satisfactory if I lost a chance to eat them.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays