Top-Rated Free Essay

After Cold War and Eu Integration

Good Essays
Nowadays, EU intends to make itself an important and effective actor in global
Politics which speak with one voice and have influence on international issues. In order
To achieve this goal, EU has developed an effective and coherent CFSP with the
Maastricht Treaty. But, to understand the CFSP better, its historical background should be evaluated. The idea of a credible and effective CFSP has been a constant theme of European integration since the early 1950’s. The failure of the EDC Project in
1950’s was followed by “Fouchet Plan”in 1960’s. After two desperate initiatives, last but successful initiative was the establishment of European Political Cooperation
(EPC) in 1970’s and 1980’s which enabled the construction of the CFSP in large scale.
The modest experience of the EPC, therefore laid the framework for the establishment of the CFSP at Maastricht.
This study aims at evaluating these three initiatives which paved the way for the creation of the CFSP and European Union states efforts to develop a coherent and effective foreign and security policy in the Cold War Period.

.Recent day we have faced many international, political and social problems, mainly we have to focus on the end of the cold war because this era had kind of changing deeply ,There are much-discussed and consensus in the field of international relations. Today it have been agreed at the beginning of the issues that arise post-cold war period, the new structure of the international system.
According to the many analysis; 21th political system is mainly concern about USA is the leader of globe so there is a unipolar system .But on the other hand according to the new analysis; they say there is a new balance of power between USA, Russia, China, India, United Nations and japan so this unipolar system is changing and there is a multipolar system is occurred.
We taking into account in the different reviews; after the cold war the new structure of the international system which level is changed or transformed and they are caused kind of argument about new global system. This study use nation-state as an analysis and they also research the level of system.
For Rosecrans; He studied at system analysis and he examined nine part of system or historical era and he said this system also bifurcate two part like balanced-stable and out of balance –unstable. There are destructive input, organizer mechanisms and social limitation of international system. For instance; when destructive inputs are too much it will go out of balance-unstable also when, organizer mechanisms are too much it will go balanced-stable.
European centred classical balance of power was established international system at 18th and 19th century. The beginning of the 20th century; First World War (1914-1945), which was the one of the deadly and destructive war, and Second World War (1939-1945) caused transition period in international structure and these war also gave huge power to USA.
1946-1991 this period was called cold war .While the cold war was continuing, there was a bipolar international system was occurred. The approach of England and USA caused first polar Soviet which became a powerful and centre of attraction. Than USA was also established against polar and USA was pushed by Soviet power so USA was respected west block and Soviet was respect east block. These powers of divisions had few member states. Block leaders and member states political, solidarity, economic, strategic and geopolitical behaviour and applications created bipolar system’s main principles and parameters thus; with this way balance of power was between two blocks. Leaders power was supported with own international impact, capacity. West (Nato-USA) and East (Soviet) block applied surround and stabilization policy for everything. In addition in cold war time’s bipolar system; India, Egypt, Indonesia... etc. these countries were not joining west or east block.
Briefly; Balance of power was distributed between these polar and solidarity, political pronunciation and application were dominate, power politics and conflict were lived under realist theory. This bipolar system was collapse at 1990 with Berlin Wall was broken down and split of The Soviet Union at 1991.

Between 1991-2001; the Soviet Union was broken and USA showed own winning.it was the meaning of cold war’s bipolar structure was ended when Iraq invasion to Kuwait at august 1990. And also this invasion was caused gulf crisis at that time USA’s president Bush said that; he used ‘’new world order’’ concept and he also said bipolar system was ended and there is a new order is emerged at international system. According to the USA‘s ‘’new world order’’ saying was showed that; it tells there is a change –transform at international system and it also showed there are new expansion at international geopolitics and geostrategic.
After the Soviet Union collapse Russia replaced at international system at 1991-2001. Gorbachev has started Glasnost (transparency \openness) and Perestroika (restructuring\rebuilding) with this political ways transition to liberal-democratic political structure and free market economy, they were caused starting a reformation course. With the collapse of soviet union and the end of cold war Russia only focused on domestic policy so it was not effective on international policy at 1999-2000 so USA was the leader or central power of Europe and it also established global empire (supreme power).USA’s geopolitics and geostrategic policy aims and application was also called transition or interim period at international system which under USA‘s led by (after 1990)
As a matter of fact 11 October conflict was shown that there was no monopole system. Francis Fukuyama wrote an article, which was called ‘’ Does the end of history?’’ at The National Interest journal, he argued that the end of history thesis with liberal-democratic values is the last level of human’s ideological evolution and he also publicized to international public opinion USA’s victory at cold war and the leadership of World. On the other hand there were 11october attack was famous .Pentagon and World Trade Centre, which are the most important symbolic building at USA’s history, had assaults which gave negative impact at USA’s prestige and these caused examine 21th century’s system. USA always was successful at kept away from their own continent but 11 October attacks were shown that USA had a war or conflict on own land at first time so this event also important for 21th century because they showed that system was changed or transformed from monopole to bipolar international system. Returning to bipolar system’s symbolic event was 11 October is shown after the terror offensive USA’s geopolitics and geostrategic was decrease day by day at east(Iraq) , central Asia(Afghanistan ) so international actors who have the potential to become the global leader like Russia ,China ,India ,Japan and European Union …etc. They became global competitors for USA and they also contributed Conjecture forming an international impetus to the strategic expansions. Regional powers like Turkey, Iran Brazil ,Indonesia also take place at this game and they supported new multi-polar system at changes in the international system transformation. These all strategic change-transform and after the 11 October cause kind of free action at system with get powerful regional alliance and new formations are kind of international strategic acts which impact or imply of majority .
For example; at 13may 2008 international union was established(UNASUR) between Argentina Bolivia, brazil chili Colombia ,Equator ,Guano, Paraguay ,Peru, Surinam, Uruguay and Venezuela .the changing of international system topic ‘s background was shown these new transforms were used by leaders with strategic ways. They are influence at international literature .for instance; February 2007 at 43.th security conference Vladimir Putin’s speaking in Munich, the president of Russia, : recent years I am following USA’s create a monopole world policy . If one country want to accept own rules to other all countries like this is natural rule for all region, these places have not peace and stable you also accept or wait many problems. In modern world think this one leader implement issue is not possible and it also unacceptable so I think USA use dangerous power and if you use missile shield we will give the answer defiantly. Indian and Russia foreign minister also have against to monopole system and they explained with a joint declaration. Today there are many discussions at USA about importance of multipolar sytem.
There are many debates about Bush‘s doctrine for American project .He said; ‘’we have to revised with other important countries for America (if we have good relation or policy these country our project’s future will be possible with others’ support.). These all changing was concretized with report of USA National Intelligence Council‘s global trends at 2025 article under ‘’ a changing world’’ title. According to the article the axis of power will slip from west to east. When these changing will occurred non-state actors will have important impact at international system. They will also contribute for pluralism of the system with emerging states. According to the report at this era, which is called; global multi-polar system, Russia, China and India will have bigger role in Middle East.
After the cold war time there were many arguments were said like some analysis showed that where international system is going and about system new shape and future. First decade; we faced unipolar world order dominated with American leadership .These years had many uncertainties with insufficient geopolitical power and leaders new role of system.11 October 2001 has not renamed so this attacks also added and examined ‘’after cold war era’’ and this time really important for international system it also has created breaking point and also it was the central of global system. Today works/studies ,which are starting under ‘’after cold war’’ title , are changing and they also called and examined under ‘’ after 11 october’’ title . briefly;first decade’s uncertainties at international system’s future and this uncertanities was reduced by 11 october attacks and providences also were shown and there were many debate were occurred about international system’s evolution.
Today international actors aware of importance of pluralistic structure and they are playing with this awareness. They are developing our networks of the system and they are rebuilding within the framework of pluralist parameters.

|

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The end of WWII left the United States and the Soviet Union as the two dominant world powers, and they soon became locked in a “cold war” confrontation. The Cold War spread from Europe to become a global ideological conflict between democracy and communism. Among its effects were a nasty hot war in Korea and a domestic crusade against “disloyalty.”…

    • 4151 Words
    • 119 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Cold War; and changes in international conflict following the end of the Cold War. The third section…

    • 2016 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ronald Reagan Influence

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During the years of 1947-1991, the World was divided in two, the eastern nations, who believed in Communism and social equality, and those of western nations, who believed in Democracy and free-trade. The world changed a lot during this time, leading from a world divided into a world that was more accepting of foreign ideas. Tensions between the United states and the USSR rose during the Cold War, but feel and disappeared altogether during the end. It was a War fought with espionage and secrecy, instead of combat and bombings. A war with no declaration or actual documentation of conflict, it was the war that lasted 45 years, it was the Cold War.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Cold War in the 1980s was driven by Reagan’s policies and attitudes towards the Soviet Union. In this period the implications of his policies and attitudes had a major impact on the United States and Soviet relations and created the path to the ending the Cold War. Reagan’s attitudes and policies were aggressive and there were fierce tensions but Mikhail Gorbachev sparked a turning point and Reagan’s attitudes and policies became less hawkish. Through the policy of the Strategic Defence Initiative (SDI) and Reagan’s strong attitude against communism it heightened tensions between the two superpowers. The tensions slowly became defused after Gorbachev came to power and the Geneva, Reykjavik and Washington Summits led to a good working relationship between the two superpower leaders and eventually the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty in 1987 which was a beginning to an end. The turning point of Gorbachev’s arrival was a positive influence and its implications were tremendous which eased the tensions between the US and Soviets.…

    • 1652 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Cold War

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The formal plan of study is stated in the timeline given below. The main focus of the review will be to understanding and assessing one of the seminal events in modern world history. The review will provide a broad interpretive overview offering a general account of the Cold war. I will be making notes for my final draft with a regular study of the book covering all the relevant chapters in accordance with the theme of the course. I shall submit the final review by the date mentioned in the handout. The review process will be done by first reading the chapters and then joining the notes prepared for each chapter into a meaningful text thus covering the objectives of the review.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cold War in 1980s

    • 3497 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Since Cold War began at the end of World War in the late 1940s, the two superpowers, the United States and the Soviet Union, were racing their power to get their dominance over another. Each side feared the other’s superior weapons, such as the United States had nuclear weapon and the USSR had their mighty Red Army. The Cold War spread through decades and seemed to be indefinite. Two superpowers with the race of weapon not only weakened their economy but also threaten each other with their massive arsenals. Two sides negotiated to reduce half the numbers of nuclear weapon on each side as they worried that if the war started, it would be the third World War, and the destruction of the third war would be tremendous and severe. 1980s turned out to be the most important decade with many events which lead the Soviet Union to dissolved officially and breaking up into fifteen separate nations on December 31, 1991.…

    • 3497 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Origin of Cold War

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The article of D. F. Fleming, Emeritus Professor of International Relations at Vanderbilt University, “The Cold War and its Origins” deserves the consideration of all who would concern themselves with the with the truths of the past fifty years, not as seen from America to Soviet Union, but as seen through an individual whose initial concern is fact. In this article, the author determined the root causes of the Cold War. The author describes the events of Russian Revolution that was started in 1917. However, according to Fleming’s study and research, the main cause of the cold war was America. After the end of the Second World War in 1945, the world was split into three segments. This included the communist bloc, an anticommunist bloc and a few states that assumed a neutral position. The subsequent twenty years witnessed persistent hostility and enmity between the different blocs. This characterized the ‘Cold War’. There were two major powers that spread across the world into Asia, Africa and Latin America. This dominated the international scene the world…

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The following text is about the regionalism after the end of Cold War. In also includes the brief introduction of the conflict, actions and circumstances which were happening after the end and which have a direct relations which the further situation.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The purpose of this essay is to prove that Cold War had an enormous impact on society and institutions of US. This effect will be demonstrated on the basis of a few examples.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1945, after World War II, there was an end to the alliance between the United States, Britain, and the USSR. If all of this hadn’t been a problem, a rivalry between communist and capitalist societies had led to what is known today as The Cold War. It has been known to this day that The Cold War not only had many causes but also had many effects. From the Arms Race to The Cuban Missile Crisis, it all had a great impact on society, economy, and politics. The Cold War was called “The Cold War”, because it didn’t actually lead up to a hot conflict, it just kind of led away from using weapons. At the end of World War II, Germany was divided into four sections of occupations that were controlled by Britain, France, the Soviet Union, and the United States. A lack of agreement on Germany to be unified marked the beginning of the Cold War. The Cold War was the most important political issue of the postwar period.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    With the end of World War II (WWII) in 1945 began the Cold War, an international conflict that lasted from 1947–1991 and plagued nations across the globe. As the post-war negotiations were deliberated by three of the strongest world powers, the United States (US), Britain, and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), disagreements arose that created tension between the US and the USSR and ultimately instigated the infamous “Fifty Years War” (Crockatt 64). But was this conflict avoidable, or was the Cold War simply inevitable? In order to effectively answer to this issue, the origins and conflicts leading to the Cold War must be evaluated with reference to the post-war territorial condition in Eastern Europe, Soviet motives, and American motives. Orthodox historians, or first generation historians, blame the USSR for the war as a whole and believe that the American reaction was necessary to combat Soviet aggression. However, the revisionist historians, or second generation historians, understands that the US had expansionist intentions and the USSR acted in a defensive manner (Crockatt 64). Ultimately, Cold War was inevitable to a moderate extent. The war was initiated by serious international conflict. However, much of the conflict was heightened as a result of miscommunication between countries.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Cold War is the name given to the period between 1945, the end of the Second World War, and 1991, the date of the collapse of the Soviet Union and is used to describe a period of stand-off between the USA and the USSR – a cold war being fought by all means short of international armed conflict – who are often described as the ‘superpowers’. Over the past 60 years historians have disagreed over the origins of the conflict, most notably over the question of who was to blame for the breakdown in American-Soviet relations. At the end of the 1940-1945 conflict the alliance of the ‘Big Three’, the USA, the British Empire and the Soviet Union, had emerged victorious yet by the 1950s the Western Powers were at loggerheads with the USSR and remained so until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.…

    • 3367 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cold War is categorized by intercontinental associations during the time of Europe’s innovations. The long lasting effects and extensive lasting supporters still hold strong for Europe. The Cold War came about by public speculations and pressures in Europe at the close of World War II and by collective control quarrels amid the Soviet Union. Financial parting among the Soviets and the west also amplified pressures, along with the risk of nuclear war.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This paper will discuss/describe the current relationship between the U.S. and other countries since the Cold War.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cold War

    • 4652 Words
    • 19 Pages

    For Americans and many in the world, the Cold War dominated international relations from 1945-1991. Only the nuclear balance of terror prevented this uneasy peace from becoming all out war, and few if any events could be understood outside of the context of this bipolar rivalry. As the Cold War came to an end, some thought we had witnessed "an end to history."(1) Instead, we have witnessed a fundamental change in the logic of world politics. The United States has had difficulty developing a clear and coherent foreign policy in this new era. The New World Order of President Bush and the strategy of engagement and enlargement of President Clinton seem vague and ambiguous when compared to the clarity and simplicity of the American policy of containment during the Cold War. While this policy of containment rapidly gained a consensus both among the American foreign policy elite as well as the mass public after World War Il, it did represent a fundamental shift of relations with the Soviet Union from one of wartime cooperation. Explaining the origins of the Cold War has been one of the most common and contested topics in the study of American diplomatic history, and the end of the Cold War has changed how historians examine and interpret this period. Increasingly, scholars have gained access to documents, especially on the Soviet side, that have allowed them to go beyond past conjecture and utilize archival evidence. The end of the Cold War has removed much of the passion that surrounded writing Cold War history while scholars and states were still living it. This increased detachment has allowed historians to move from placing blame to recognizing the ideological conflict that was at the center of the Cold War's origins.…

    • 4652 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Better Essays