Preview

Advocates Of Mass Surveillance

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
219 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Advocates Of Mass Surveillance
On the other hand, the advocates of mass surveillance justify the government’s spy activities by claiming that people who have nothing to hide should not be afraid of being monitored by the government because surveillance will not interfere in their lives while keeping their lives safer through the elimination of terrorists and criminals. It is fair to argue that in some extreme situations, people have to give up their privacy in exchange for safety and security. However, it is not merely about the problems of invading someone’s life and collecting his/her private data. More importantly, it is about the problems of processing information. The authorities use individuals’ data to profile them and make decisions about them, but refuse to tell

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The article “Visible Man” written by Peter Singer discusses the issues that are involved with the topic of privacy. Many people feel that they are comfortable with the actions they are taking but they do not realize the information they are putting out into the real world. Singer explains how government officials use cell phone providers to gain insight on certain individuals. The idea that is stressed in this article is that too much privacy is never good, especially with government officials because the confidential information that gets leaked informs society on what it going on behind the scenes. The more information one can gather about a topic, the more informed they will be; furthermore, being well educated on a topic will allow one…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the past few months new discoveries have been made uncovering the activities of several government agencies. There has been an unearthing of facts that outline the collaboration between several large companies in possession of massive amounts of information concerning the whereabouts and habits of citizens with agencies that intended to analyze this data, these partnerships being PRISM. The most frightening part of these events is not the unconstitutional acts of the government but the response of the citizens. Even with full knowledge of data harvesting and tracking, many choose to simply adopt the philosophy of, “I have nothing to hide, let them read my stuff.” People that follow this channel of thinking are making the mistake of assuming that they know what the government is looking for. What they fail to realize is, is that this attitude directly enables the government to take more and more control. The erosion of civil liberties is something to fear, not because of the idea of an immediate shift, but because those liberties will be gone before a realization of what is happening, and at which point a recourse is no longer on option.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article "In Praise of Big Brother: Why We Should Learn to Stop Worrying and Love (Some) Government Surveillance" Taylor contends that individuals ought not stress over state monitoring. Taylor calls attention to that an individual ought to grasp surveillance as opposed to rejecting it. The development of surveillance is huge with current innovations permitting spies to find individuals in any part of the world. Taylor is, in any case, snappy to bring up that private data ought to just be utilized as a part of ethically passable ways (Winston, M. & Edelbach, R., 2012). Taylor contends that individuals ought not be concerned over who is viewing however what the watcher will do with the content gathered. He contends that surveillance is not wrong as long as there are legitimate lawful shields to ensure individuals from government abuse.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I chose to focus my analysis on Edward Snowden and his disclosure of classified domestic surveillance documents. When the leak first came out, I was upset at the thought of my privacy being violated by the NSA. However, the feeling dissipated when I considered the protection making that sacrifice affords. The NSA, like many organizations, are sometimes faced with ethical dilemmas. Occasionally, there is no right answer. Thus, the decision made, while not ideal, is the lesser of evils. In his TED talk interview, Snowden stated, “Your rights matter because you never know when you're going to need them” (TED, 13:20). While I admit his statement did trigger the reexamination of my stance, I arrived at the same position. Perhaps, I will look back…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Indivdual Assignment

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Does the massive use of Big Brother surveillance technologies make you feel safer because it can protect you from crime, or less safe because of possible violations of your civil liberties? Will you be more careful now using communication technologies, knowing that anything you type or send electronically could be reconstructed and used to judge your lawfulness or your character?”…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patriot Act Pros And Cons

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Congressional Digest, 94(10), 8. Sun-ha, H. (2017). Criticizing surveillance and surveillance critique: Why privacy and humanism are necessary but insufficient. Surveillance & Society.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consider the technology that defines everyday life in America- texts, email, internet, and phone calls. In performing these constant activities, most never questioned their privacy, that is, until Edward Snowden squealed on the NSA’s less than ethical maneuvers. Without citizens’ consent, the American government was collecting metadata, “all the information surround a call, including the caller’s number, the receiver's number, the time and location of the call, and how long it lasted” (Diamond). The government may have been shooting for just the bad guys, but all American civilians got caught in the crossfire. Nothing would exempt a person from these invasions of privacy, and their data would be scanned and stored just like that of a seasoned…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Privacy is Utterly Dead Peter Singer is the Ira W. DeCamp Professor at Princeton University and the University of Melbourne that studies Bioethics, Philosophy and Public Ethics. His essay “Visible Man: Ethics in a World without Secrets” focuses on transparency and personal privacy. One can see after reading this essay, Singer is in favor of openness, but he also notes that the government misuses these technologies by having sousveillance and surveillance cameras. A person needs to understand how privacy, surveillance and sousveillance is defined to understand why he was in favor of openness.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government is not spending enough time and resource in surveillance, which is resulting in the threats and decrease of national security. Surveillance is the act of observing, or monitoring a person. Monitoring a person can include the use of cameras, wiretaps, GPS tracking, and internet surveillance. Events such as the Oklahoma City bombing, and the attack on 9/11 lead to a law former President Bush passed. "On October 26th, 2001, Bush signed into law the USA Patriot Act." (Podesta) Government surveillance is an essential part of everyday life because not only does it keep the country under control, but ensures safety for Americans.…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The United States of America is based on freedom and holds capabilities citizens would never have in any other country. Although this is the case, we Americans aware that there is a price for the freedom they were given? “There is no such thing as a free lunch” a saying repeated by many hard-working Americans. Little does the population know that this indeed relates to them as well? Much like any other country, Americans government has kept their civilization in the dark of their true colors. Evidence has surfaced as early as the 1920’s that the government has had surveillance of the population without their knowledge. Extending their surveillance, the government has now invaded on innocent’s…

    • 2200 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author of this article is Daniel J. Solove. He discusses the different perspectives and opinions of various people of the government’s control of viewing personal information. The article demonstrates this through examples of what people say, book references, and the opinion of the article himself. In the article, “The Nothing to Hide Argument”, Daniel J. Solove argues that the information- gathering programs the government uses to track and record information from people are problematic.(739) This still remains the case even if the information gathered from these programs was information people did not mind being uncovered. (739).…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the essay “Privacy Under Attack”, the authors explains that people in today’s society are experiencing violation of their privacy by the government, the companies, and the criminals.The authors explains that criminals are not only people who would violate our privacy. They explained that the government would violate the citizens privacy for citizens’ safety by usage of surveillance cameras all over the place. The government is using these to find out about the criminal activities and to prevent crimes, as the authors explained. Furthermore, the authors explained that the companies are also violating the privacy right of the citizens through spreading of the personal information that were collected…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To ensure expressive, associational, and privacy rights are strengthened instead of being compromised by new technology is the goal of the Protecting Civil Liberties and protect the core democratic rights when corporate and government practices that rely on new technology that invades these rights. The government regularly tracks all calls of nearly every common American and spy on a large number of Americans’ international calls, text messages, and emails. Whistle blower Eric Snowden, a contractor with NSA, willfully and knowingly exposed the government’s most sensitive surveillance techniques without authorization and the most fundamental rights as individuals. The ACLU has been fighting for over 12 years to end government surveillance’s lack of oversight that allows it to invade the rights and lives of millions of Americans. When the case against mass surveillance reached the Supreme Court several years ago, was dismissed due to lack of sufficient evidence of the secret programs. Leading the way, the ACLU’s struggle to rein in the surveillance superstructure which strikes at the core of our privacy rights, freedom of speech and association will continue. ("ACLU: National…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    All the countries establish in its political constitution and in its legislation, the duty of the government to look over the life of its citizens, protecting them from the risk: the internal threats (inside the proper country) and external (outside the country) That is why, it is admitted, and it is even required, that the government possess a structure of intelligence that resists the action of dangerous forces, however lately, it has been found that in order to get information that may be useful to protect citizens , the government itself reach private information from all its citizens as well. That is why this essay aims to point out the risks this action (spying) implies for all and aims to answer thereupon,” Why government should not spy on us.”…

    • 806 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Argumentation Essay

    • 609 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Sean Flynn’s article, “Is Anything Private Anymore”, he argues whether or not our privacy is being invaded and why we should protect ourselves. I honestly agree with Sean’s argument because it’s true how everyone’s information is being hacked. Privacy is a diminished subject for all citizens, which is being exploited or exchanged with different markets. Today, in our society people want to have as much privacy as they can, but unfortunately we can’t always get what we want! Pretty much everything that we do is being used against us either in a bad way or good way. America is supposed to be a country of “freedom”, but as you can see it’s really not. Since privacy is now set as a high demand people will do anything to gain information on another person.…

    • 609 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays