Preview

Advantages Of Plea Bargaining

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
143 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Advantages Of Plea Bargaining
There are many advantages and disadvantages to plea bargaining. The advantages to plea bargaining are the following: they take away the stress of a trial, it makes room in the court process for more serious cases, it allows the a person to not get the maximum sentence, for some criminals, they will testify against a co-defendant to help out in a bigger case and overall, if every case went to trial, the court system would be backed up for months or who knows how long.
Some of the disadvantages are: plea bargains can make investigators to become complacent, be lazy thinking that the plea bargain will be done, they can make a person admit that they are guilty even when they are not and if you are the victim or victims family can feel slighted
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Week 3 CJA 394 Court Trends

    • 1550 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Week 3 CJA 394 Court Trends

    In other occasions court administrators, prosecutors and judges prefer to go for plea bargains to help reduce case volumes and in other cases granted time to the parties so they can prepare themselves for the case or to obtain further documentation to avoid losing time during the next hearing moving the case for a date where they might not have such big overload. Another option that the court administrators recur is to divide cases upon the crime in order to fit all short non complicated crimes in a day vs. having many complicated cases all together in one day since that would delay the case flow.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plea Bargaining Case Study
    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Plea Bargaining Case Study

    When a justice system replaces jury trials with plea negotiations it contradicts the fair rules of evidence in front of a judge or a jury. Plea negotiations are very different from the formal process. Criminals end up of facing sentences that are lighter while victims are left unsatisfied. Plea Bargaining is very private which can affect the outcome and will not benefit the everybody. While the bargain might help that receive less severe penalties than a conviction at trial, the bargain may still leave you with a criminal record that can have a huge affect in the future. For example, in Erma Stewart’s case after she chose to plea guilty her entire life changed. As she explained she could not afford to pay her probation fines due to the fact…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Personal Injury Claim Settlement Case Study
    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Personal Injury Claim Settlement Case Study

    And the guilty party saves some money that they otherwise had to pay as court costs and attorney fees. Thus out of court settlement is helpful for both.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plea Bargains Research Paper
    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page

    Plea Bargains Research Paper

    Plea bargains are exceptionally regular in the American lawful framework, representing about 90% of every single criminal case. Numerous nations, be that as it may, don't permit plea bargains, thinking of them as deceptive and shameless…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Questions Week 3
    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Questions Week 3

    There are many advantages and disadvantages when it comes to plea bargaining. Among the advantages the defendants could possibly receive a lighter sentence, they can end up with a lesser charge, and most importantly they move through the criminal justice system a lot faster than if they were to fight a case. As for disadvantages both the defendants and the victims would be affected by plea bargaining. The defendant might not be guilty however he/she knows not enough evidence exists to prove their innocence and so they accept the plea, thus accepting punishment this not deserved. Victims are affected by plea bargaining because they almost always feel cheated as though the accused did not get what he/she deserved and as though justice was not served.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Ins and Outs of Plea Bargaining
    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Ins and Outs of Plea Bargaining

    The concept of plea bargaining became a common means to resolve criminal cases in the early 1900s because not everyone that was accused of a crime had a lawyer to represent them in a trial. As the criminal justice system evolved, and there were more and more cases to prosecute, plea-bargaining was used more often so that all parties would have a faster resolution to the case, as opposed to going through a lengthy trial. The definition of plea bargaining is “the process whereby the accused and the prosecutor in a criminal case work out a mutually satisfactory disposition of the case subject to court approval [that] usually involves the defendant’s pleading guilty to a lesser offense or to only some of the counts of a multicounty indictment in return for a lighter sentence than the possible for the graver charge.” (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011, Chapter 12, Plea Bargaining and Guilty Pleas).…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining
    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

    Some pros of plea bargain is, creating a less over-crowed, over-whelmed system by taking simple cases away. With taking smaller cases away the prosecutors will have few trials to deal with and they will be more effective to the major cases they have. Another positive thing is that not matter if…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plea Bargain
    • 857 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plea Bargain

    Brief: Respondent was arrested and charged with possession of methamphetamine with the intent to distribute, in violation of 84 Stat. 1260. On October 17, 1991, respondent and his attorney asked to meet with the prosecutor to discuss the possibility of cooperating with the Government. At the beginning of the meeting, the prosecutor informed respondent that he had no obligation to talk, but that if he wanted to cooperate, he would have to be completely truthful. As a condition of proceeding with the discussion, the prosecutor indicated that the respondent would have to agree that any statements he made could be used to impeach any contradictory testimony he might give at trial if it went that far. Respondent conversed with his counsel and agreed to proceed under the prosecutor’s conditions. The respondent admitted to knowing that the package he attempted to sell to the undercover cop did contain methamphetamine. Respondent claimed that he did not know Shuster was manufacturing methamphetamine at his residence and later confessed that he did know of Shuster manufacturing methamphetamine in his residence. Respondent minimized his role in Shuster’s methamphetamine operation by claiming that he had not visited Shuster’s residence for at least a week before his arrest. The government showed the respondent surveillance evidence showing that his car was at Shuster’s residence the day before the arrest. The meeting ended on the basis that the respondent failed to provide completely truthful information. Respondent was tried on the methamphetamine charges and took the stand at his own defense. He maintained that he was not involved in the methamphetamine trafficking and he had thought Shuster was using his home laboratory to make plastic explosives for the CIA. He denied knowing that the package he delivered to the…

    • 857 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Role Of Plea Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System
    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Role Of Plea Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System

    Plea bargaining is the essence of the criminal justice system, and it is the process in which a defendant pleads guilty to a criminal charge in order to receive some consideration from the state. There are various types of plea bargaining deals that defendants may accept, which include charge bargaining, count bargaining, and sentence bargaining. Charge bargaining requires the defendant to plead guilty to a less serious crime than the one originally charged with. Count bargaining requires the defendant to plead guilty to partial charges or counts, but not all of the charges presented against them. Lastly, sentence bargaining requires the defendant to plead guilty in exchange for leniency in sentencing.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plea Bargain: Why It Violates The Six Amendment
    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Plea Bargain: Why It Violates The Six Amendment

    The main fault that I see with a plea bargain is that it violates the six amendment. The reason why the sixth amendment is in violation is that plea bargaining goes against what it stands for. The sixth amendment states that everyone has the right to a fair trial; however, most cases are not even analyzed in front of a judge or jury because of a plea bargain. The main reason a plea bargain is put into play is to push a case through the system faster and resolve it quicker. Furthermore, everyone knows that when situations are rushed that information is likely to be missed. For example, there are many situations where defendants take a plea bargain to stray away from more intense punishment. However, many individuals who take this bargain are…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining
    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

    The question we are debating today is whether or not plea-bargaining undermines the Criminal justice system? The job of the Criminal justice system is to protect the citizens of the United States. How are we protecting them if we give criminals shorter sentences than they deserve? When we plea bargain we release more criminals back into the streets and put citizens of the United States' safety at risk. A plea bargain is an agreement in a criminal case in which a prosecutor and a defendant arrange to settle the case against the defendant. The United states department of justice's mission statement reads: To enforce the law and defend the interests of the United States according to the law; to ensure public safety against threats foreign and domestic; to provide federal leadership in preventing and controlling crime; to seek just punishment for those guilty of unlawful behavior; and to ensure fair and impartial administration of justice for all Americans. This statement is being undermined because not…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plea Bargaining In Criminal Justice
    • 81 Words
    • 1 Page

    Plea Bargaining In Criminal Justice

    Plea bargaining is an essential tool used in the criminal justice system today.The process of plea bargaining usually begins before trial, and can involve a phone call between the prosecutor and the defense (Phelps & Cengage, 2006). Once the plea bargain is negotiated it would have to be approved by a judge in open court (Phelps & Cengage, 2006)With the amount of court proceedings that take place plea bargaining is a tool that can allow less cases on a judge’s…

    • 81 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Role Of Plea Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System
    • 127 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Role Of Plea Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System

    As Nataskie stated above, there is a place and a need for plea bargaining in our criminal justice system. Although it is true that plea bargaining gives a guilty person the opportunity to admit to their crime and accept the punishment for it, they are likely more motivated by the fact that plea bargaining involves the perpetrator receiving a reduced sentence of some sort. Another reason for continuing with plea bargaining, as a tool in the criminal justice system, is because often it affords the prosecutor the means necessary to get a lesser criminal to testify against a more significant criminal who otherwise might go free. Plea bargaining should maintain an active role in all justice systems regardless of whether they are local, state,…

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Public Defender
    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Public Defender

    Michael Becker, a public defender in Orange County visited our class. Public defenders are people who defense for people who cannot afford to hire a lawyer. Public Defenders consider their clients as the most important thing, and they treat their clients with dignity and respect since most of their clients are on the margins of the society, and they are not treated with respect. Even though public defenders receive funding from the government, they do not represent the government. Orange county had public offenders for 70 years, which is longer than the federal public offenders with the history of 50 years. I could tell public defenders disliked the district attorneys by Michael’s description of district attorneys and the way he talks about…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charge Negotiation
    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Charge Negotiation

    A plea bargain falls under the discretionary powers of the prosecution, meaning the public is able to trust that the parties involved in the process have upheld the same judicial principles that would apply to a conviction reached after trial.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics