Preview

Advantage And Disadvantages Of The North And South

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
351 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Advantage And Disadvantages Of The North And South
The North and South had their advantages and disadvantages against each other. The north had Abraham Lincoln as their president who was very leadership skilled, with more experience while the south had Jefferson Davis. The north could have better systems and a better way of government. The south had military leadership of Robert E Lee, Stonewall Jackson, P.T.G Beauregard, James Longstreet, and J.E.B Stuart. The north only had leadership of 2 people Ulysses S. Grant and William T. Sherman. This was the advantage to the South because they had more minds to create battle tactics. The north had the loyalty of border states to help them fight in the war and not turn down. However, the south had the home field advantage which provided more confidence.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The north relied heavily on industry and commerce, while the south relied heavily on plantations and agriculture. They were also seeing completely different views on the subject of slavery. Three big causes of the Civil War were that of states vs. federal rights, slavery within territories, and the abolition movement.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3.Due to the substantial differences between the North’s industrial economy and the South’s agricultural economy they both had distinct advantages and disadvantages during the war. To begin with, the North’s economy was far superior to the South’s because the North had two-thirds of the nation’s population, two-thirds of the railroad mileage, and almost 90% of the nation’s industrial output. Also, many of the North’s arm factories were equipped with mass production which allowed them to compete with the gun manufacturing centers and armories of the South. The Northern economy helped them have much greater supply of resources compared to the South. On the other hand, the Confederacy had slaves which helped provide food for the army and provide the most important good of all, cotton. The South was able to use cotton as diplomatic weapon which they thought they could use to persuade France or Britain to assist or side with the Confederacy. We can also see this as a disadvantage to the Northern economy because they had no such tool or weapon to use to obtain foreign assistance or aid. Unfortunately this same advantage for the South also led to a severe disadvantage. Because the majority of the people living in the South did not own slaves, they were not the ones producing cotton. This meant that the majority of the…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robert E Lee Thesis

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    They had nearly all of the advantages. One thing they had was a greater population that could fight and also free black men, while the south debated over whether they should be able to fight until the war was over. The North also had an established government that was over a hundred years old while the South started with one only a few weeks old. One major factor that the North had was the boom of the Industrial Revolution and lots more money. The only big advantage the south had was Robert E.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The North (Union) fought on for the sake of keeping the country united under one flag and one leader. Their ideas were like those of the northern abolitionists – they opposed the ideas of slavery being continued and fought to give the blacks the freedom that they ever so rightfully deserved. This reason to go to war, although just, was a very weak call to arms for many of the union soldiers. They constantly debated on whether it was really worth putting their lives on the line for a union that was already broken. The South fought for the people dwelling within – for their families and neighbors. “He fought for his people, for the children and the kin,” (Shaara…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One factor that had the greatest impact in driving the country in war was the economic difference. The North and the South had different opinion and beliefs making them divide as a region. The Invention of cotton gin by Eli Whitney in 1793 made gathering cotton possible. This caused an increase in plantations to grow cotton which caused the great need for cheap labor. It meant that slaves were the cheap labor to get the work done. The southern economy became dependent on slavery and cotton. While in the northern states it was established on industry. North was purchasing raw cotton and turning it into finished goods. In the North people had to work together it didn't matter about their culture or class they were but rather had to put their…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because slaves fought for the South, many slaves were not fighting for what they believe in, while the North had more and passionate soldiers fighting for the North’s stance. Furthermore, the North’s expansion…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Time. Time was the key reason for the North's victory and was achieved through a combination of the first and second reasons. As the war progressed the Union's blockade, largely a paper tiger at the beginning due to the fact that the Navy didn't have enough ships to properly enforce it, became a real blockade that slowly strangled the Confederacy to death. And as the war progressed the South, even before the end of the prisoner exchange, was losing men it could not afford to lose to attrition. Supplies and transportation of supplies. As stated in the first reason, the North was less dependant on Europe than the South was for supplies. There should be little doubt that the South was able to manufacture supplies needed to fight the war, but never in amounts it needed. Industry in the North was a bit larger than it was in the South and was thus able to out produce that of the South. But being able to out produce the South was all well and good unless the South could get the supplies to its troops in the field faster. It then became important to capture major railroad junctions and thus cut off the South's ability to move supplies in a timely…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The relations between the North and South had disagreements over taxes. The North raised the taxes appointed by Congress on imported goods to support their industrial development. On the contrary, in the South, being an agricultural economy had to buy machinery from the foreign and ending paying for those high taxes. On the 1850s, Congress increased the import tax from 15 to 37 percent. The South threatened the northern mandataries; consequently, the north was offended. Besides, Chicago Daily Times published that if the South withdraws from the north, the economy could be affected as income cutting in half (Stanley, 2011). The southerners were unhappy in how the North was limiting their earnings.…

    • 112 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Do People Push West

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why and how the North have the advantage in the Civil War? The North had an advantage over the South in many fields, including its population, industrial and agricultural capacity, and transportation network. Half of the men of military age fought for the Union in the North, around 2.1 million were supplemented by Irish, German immigrants and African Americans who most of them were ex-slaves from the South. In the South, 90 percent of the men eligible to fight and fought for the Confederacy in the South were around 900000.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When both the Union (North) and the Confederacy (South) entered into war with each other, neither side was thoroughly prepared for battle. Both the North and the South had issues gathering enough resources and raising funds to support their war efforts (Goldberg, ed. 7, The American Journey, 405). However, the Union did have an advantage over the Confederacy. The North had a large population, strong political and military leadership, and plentiful resources; while the South struggled to piece together an entirely new government and army. This early upper-hand by the Union was what helped them eventually wear down the Southern troops at the end of the war and win.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to win the war, the Union had to think smart and play it to their advantage. In the book The Civil War: A Visual History, author John E. Stanchak declared, “During the 19th century, the new era of rail and steam that marked the Industrial Revolution was centered in the Northern states, and a summary of economics and human resources shows their advantages” (Stanchak 54). The North had a lot of railroads which helped them travel faster. They also had more money and organizations than the South. These advantages boosted them further into victory.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Their strategy was to survive, own nation, provide Europe with cotton, and get United Kingdom to side. They followed the three ruled which were to wear them down, keep moral high and keep their army together as one. Their advantages were that they knew the land, had better generals, and they were more enthusiastic about the fight. But the disadvantage was that they lacked industrial goods and products, but most importantly they lacked people. The north had about 620,924 people while the south had 154,910 people.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The North and The South After 4 grueling years, The Civil War finally came to an end on May 9th, 1865. Most believed the Civil War was started was because of the “Free states” (The North) and the “Slave states” (The South) couldn’t come to a compromise over the power of national government to stop slavery in the territories that had not yet become states. Abraham Lincoln was elected president in 1860 and vowed to keep slavery out of territories. The Civil war is an incredibly crucial part of history, and the North and South have a lot to do with it.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1492 and 1763 the colonies were growing and improving their conditions from before when they had lived in Britain. Although the colonist all came for a similar reason of escaping religious persecution and had the same idea when it came to organizing their colony, they did however have a difference in class organization and how they were to go about in their trading and farming economy. The south and the north may have been comparable but they were also two totally diverse colonies at the same time. After Columbus found the new world, the pilgrims and the Puritans came over to receive religious freedom. That is what many new settlers came to do.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Dbq Analysis

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Union had a much more developed and strong government and various technological advantages over the Confederacy. For example, the North had over triple the amount of factories that the South had, six times the workers in those factories, and over double the railroad mileage compared to the South (Source 5). Contextually, these advantages in manpower and technology in the North were long term consequences of the North taking advantage of advancements in technology and having a solidified government in comparison to the South, which stuck with a plantation model based on growing cotton and had little to no government after their secession from the Union. The North’s dominance over technology and manpower gave them a more stable base of resources going into the war than the South, which basically only had cotton and not enough food or manpower. The Union’s use of their technological power gave them the ability to win battles by a landslide and leave cities as large as Atlanta, Georgia completely leveled in the wake of military advancements such as General Sherman’s March to the Sea (Source 7). The photo of the destruction left by the Union army shows the capability of the technology that they possessed in comparison to the Confederacy, and how organized the Union army was because of their strong leadership. Contrastingly, Confederate leadership was…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays