Preview

Adam Smith Lectures

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2503 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Adam Smith Lectures
Adam Smith Lectures - 1 - Frederick Weil February 1999
Adam Smith - Lecture 1 The Character of Market Society
Smith makes a number of claims about the “natural” state of things: “human nature,” “natural” prices or rates of wages, rent, and profit, “natural” character of the market and market society. In this lecture, I explore the picture of market society he gives, mainly in Book I of the Wealth of Nations. In this and the following lectures, we will see how Smith contradicts most of his basic assertions about the “naturalness” of these things.
Benefits of Market Society - Increase of productivity through division of labor (WN 13ff) - Affluence of all (WN 22) - Reduction of class differences (WN 24)
Assumptions
- Equality, but diversity (WN 28f). Accepts analysis of Hobbes; says differences arise in upbringing. Will have to ask, then, why different classes have different outlooks. Will answer, in part, due to material conditions (classes per se), and in part due to different values (esp comparing ruling groups).
- Self-interest; tendency to barter leads to harmony (WN 25f). Like Hobbes, does not argue from altruism, but also does not ascribe deadly competition here. Will have to ask later whether Smith sees this under all conditions or whether he wants this as a result of market society. I.e., is it really part of human nature, or does it stem from social conditions?
- NB: propensity to barter and division of labor are limited by extent of market (WN 31). Characteristics and inner dynamics (WN 44-8, 72f)
- “Natural” and market prices; value. - Higgling, entering and leaving market, supply and demand.
Adam Smith Lectures - 2 - Frederick Weil February 1999
Classes and class conflict - Component parts of price: wages, profits, rent. (WN 65f) - Principles which regulate each:
* supply of labor (WN 86, 85) * accumulation of capital (WN 73, 84f) * appropriation of land (WN 160, 67)
- Reasons for conflict of interests: question of subsistence of individual

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Physiocrats – group of economists who believed that the wealth of the nations was derived solely from the value pf land agriculture of land dev.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Ayau, trade and cooperation is beneficial to all parties despite differences among them in terms of capacity and talent. He states that everyone is made wealthier through cooperation, and how it is that the market economy leads to the benefit of everyone. In our world today, people base their decisions on the comparison of alternative opportunity costs at the margin, so naturally, they choose the least costly option. However, a person can only get rich by enriching others torpedoes claims to the moral high ground of those who propose that government redistribution of wealth is a means to alleviate poverty (Ayau 32). Ayau explains the workings of the free enterprise system, based on the benefits from mutual gains from trade arising from the creative productivity of a market-based and profit-guided system of division of labor. In addition, he explains that the division of labor through comparative advantage, satisfying society’s needs, trading with and by enriching others is the way someone gain wealth. He says people intuitively do what goes by the name of cost/benefit analysis, for they are quite conscious of what they are quite conscious of what they must forgo to acquire whatever they get in exchange.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2074 Final Notes

    • 6511 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Adam Smith: we are motivated by self interest, and through the invisible hand comes free market competition. This naturally to social utility. / Butcher-brewer-baker quote demonstrates that the exchange of goods if for the benefit of both parties, without no ethics involved in the exchange. / Though competition, comes social harmony and utility. The market is a self correcting mechanism because it forces us to be truthful and honest, we should not scam people because this is not beneficial to us in the future.…

    • 6511 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The success of a society is reliant on individual sacrifice. Ambitions driven by selfishness are detrimental to a community. Numerous instances of human history and literature have demonstrated the importance of limiting self-interest.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adam Smith, An inquiry into the Nature and causes of the Wealth of Nations, 1776…

    • 2270 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Adam Smith (1986) wrote, “It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest” (p. 119). Aristotle, perhaps unknowingly, described Homo economicus in his Politics; discussing the nature of self-interest, he wrote on the pleasure derived from ownership and man’s love of self as being valid because it was prescribed by nature. This was, however, “not the mere love of self, but the love of self in excess, like the miser's love of money; for all, or almost all, men love money and other such objects in a measure” (Haney, p.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Modern economic society can be described as a combination of certain points from several theories combined into one. Changing dynamics and economic needs of nations has spawned a development of various, and contrasting, economic systems throughout the world. Perhaps the two most contrasting philosophies seen in existence today are that of capitalism and communism. The two philosophers most notably recognized for their views on these economic systems are Adam Smith and Karl Marx. This paper will identify several fundamental aspects of economic philosophy as described by Smith and Marx, and will compare and contrast the views of these philosophers in relation to current global economic systems.…

    • 1263 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    They were both known for their distinct theoretical contributions. Adam Smith proposed that there should be a free market where the producers are free to produce as much as they want and charge buyers the prices that they want. He thought that this would result in the most efficient and desirable economic outcome for consumers and producers. This meant that the consumers would only pay as much or less than they would value the benefit from the good, and the producer would only sell for as much as or higher than they would have spent on making the product. The market would always be equilibrium. There would only be a limited role for the government in the economic system. Karl Marx disagreed and thought that workers would have an advantage because they are already rich and there would be a disadvantage to the poor. The rich would only get richer and the poor would only get poorer. He came out with a theory called the labor theory of value. The claims that the value of a good or service is directly connected to the amount of labor required for its production. Marx thought that the two classes in society, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, will remain stuck in their respective classes because of the very nature of capitalism. The wealthy bourgeoisie owns the factories and also dominates the media, universities, government, bureaucracy, and hence. Their position on the social status is unchangeable. The poor proletariat are only able to work hard. Marx thought that to fix this problem; the poor would have to revolt and create a new social order where there would be no distinction between segments of society. Adam Smith thought that capitalism was the most ideal economic system. Adam also opposed the idea of revolution to restore justice for the masses because he valued order and stability over relief and oppression. Marx thought that capitalism would lead to instability and injustice in a society. Marx…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    adam smith vs karl marx

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Adam Smith versus Karl Marx, this could quickly turn into a debate between the ideas of capitalism and the ideas of socialism. Without these two great economists the industrial revolution would not have been what it is nor would it have the impact that it had on the society. It was the ideologies of Adam Smith that influenced and brought change into the one dimensional feudal society, to a dynamic capitalist society. In the book “The Wealth Of Nations” Adam Smith emphasizes on the importance of division of labour and capital accumulation, in order to increase efficiency and productivity within a society. Through these two concepts, a society can fully utilize its resources and excel as a nation.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Js Mills Conformity

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The wealth of a nation stems from its labor force (ability, quality, number), which is important because the more production there is; the more there is to trade. Smith shows his opposition to mercantilism that was existent when he was writing this text; however, he gives an account of a social dynamic that is deeply embedded in human nature. He develops the idea of the division of labor and how this particular partition can lead to the prosperity of a state by producing a surplus of goods and services that can later be exchanged in the economic market. It is also important because it brings to light the significance of individualism versus membership in a community; division of labor shows that it is most ethical for economic thought to focus on individual well-being. The division of labor in industries has lead to increased worker skill (dexterity), increased efficiency, and improved machinery.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Adam Smith’s enormous authority resides, in the end, in the same property that we discover in Marx: not in any ideology, but in an effort to see the bottom of things. In both cases their greatness rests on an unflinching confrontation with the human condition as they could best make out.”…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    People will buy more coffee, drink more coffee, and research what coffee will help them lose more weight. Case in point, does espresso assist in more weight loss then normal coffee? Espresso contains more caffeine, so the thought process might be, that you can lose more weight by drinking espresso than you would drinking your everyday run of the mill ground up coffee.…

    • 1600 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Smith, A (1909) Harvard Classics: An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Soviet Union Economy

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages

    ” It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest. We address ourselves, not to their humanity but to their self-love, and never talk to them of our necessities but of their advantages. ” This particular quote by Adam Smith, in his book The Wealth of Nations depicts the human nature, and in a wider perspective, the essence of a capitalistic market in which self-interest is the only incentive that matters and…

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thomas Aquinas and Usury

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Levy, D. (1987) ‘Adam Smith’s case for usury laws’, History of Political Economy, 19: 387-400.…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays