Preview

Actus Reus/Mens Rea

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
797 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Actus Reus/Mens Rea
Angus can be charged with constructive murder of Chris under section 3A (1) of the Crimes Act 1958 , but the prosecution must prove all the elements of the offence beyond a reasonable doubt.
ACTUS REUS
The actus reus requirement for murder is that Angus caused the death of a human being and that his actions were voluntary. Chris, a human being, was an innocent customer who entered the service station and was struck by a bullet from the gun which Angus was holding; he dies as a result of this strike. Voluntariness of the action needs to be established. Angus had a loaded gun pointed at the cashier; demanding money and cigarettes, there's no question that these were all conscious and voluntary acts. Chris was struck by the bullet which was discharged from the gun as it hit the floor after falling out of Angus's hand as he slips on the floor. In applying the law to the given facts, Angus did not actually pull the trigger of the gun but all his actions prior to slipping on the floor were voluntary and the death occurred in the course of his voluntary actions; regardless of his awareness or unawareness of what might occur in the course of his actions.
Causation
Factual Causation
The prosecution must show that the it was the act of the accused was the cause of death. If it wasn't "but for" Angus having a loaded gun, Chris would not have died.
Legal Causation
The prosecution must show that the accused conduct was the substantive and operating cause of death and that any intervening act did not break the chain of causation.
In R v Hallet, the accused rendered the victim unconscious and left him at the water's edge; victim died of drowning when the tide had risen; it was held that the normal operation of the tide did not break the chain of causation; found guilty. In applying this reasoning used to the facts presented, Angus was in the service station with a loaded gun pointed at the cashier, the fact that he failed to read the warning sign of the wet

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Jack, Bert and Pratt

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the case, the court dismissed the charge of the attempt of murder of Bert because Jack could not have killed Bert due to the malfunction of his gun. The court was not right by dismissing the attempt murder charge because he had the intent to kill Bert and he even fired his weapon towards him but ended up killing Pratt. All the tree elements of an attempt were present plus it also meets the mens rea of attempt. It meets the mens rea because Jack intentionally performed an act that was proximate to the completion of a crime, and by possessing the intent or purpose to achieve a criminal objective. In addition meets the actus reus of attempt because he came extremely close to the commission of the crime. In addition he killed Pratt while pointing the gun at Bert with the intent to kill him.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Schmalleger, F., Hall, D. E., & Dolatowski, J. J. (2010). Criminal Law Today: An introduction with…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charge Negotiation

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The case of Edward Lee is significant because it shows that the process of Charge Negotiation can be abused to punish someone for a crime, even if they had not committed it. It was the 2nd time in NSW where a judge has refused to accept a manslaughter plea. Justice Hulme’s decision was applauded and attorney-general Chris Hartcher said it was “wonderful to see the court taking a firm stand”.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Regina Knight Case

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In order for a trial to be brought, the police and prosecutors might be able to prove that the elements of the particular offence are present. In this criminal case both Actus reus, Mens rea as well causation was clearly shown through the behavior of Katherine Knight.…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An example of a case where this happened is R v white. In this case the defendant poisoned his mother by putting poison in her milk and she fell asleep and never woke up. She died from a heart attack and not the poison so he was not liable for murder but for attempt, the but for test was applied and it was found that the result would have occurred regardless of the defendants actions.…

    • 1719 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The legal issue in question (on appeal) is whether the defendants can claim the self-defense defense. The defendants wish to claim this defense because Agent Wallie Howard had opened fire on them during the third cocaine “buy-bust” deal.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Good evening Your Honor, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, and opposing counsel. Tonight you heard the testimony and evidence in Roughed Grouse High School's attempt to hide, justify, and deny their negligent actions. In order to prove Roughed Grouse High School's negligence resulting in the death of Jordan Simon, I, along with my co-counsel, had to prove our case, not beyond a reasonable doubt, but simply by a preponderance of evidence. In other words, if you were to put the evidence favoring the case of the plaintiff and evidence favorable to the defendant on a scale, we the plaintiff would have to make the scales tip ever so slightly in our favor. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, we have done just that. We have proved to you tonight by a preponderance of evidence, not that the defendant was solely responsible for the unfortunate and untimely death of Jordan Simon, but that those representing Roughed Grouse High School were more negligent above all others involved.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Murder is the most serious form of unlawful homicide. Murder is a common law offence, and has never been defined by statute. The most commonly accepted definition is the one given by the early 17th century judge, Sir Edward Coke. He defined murder as: ‘The unlawful killing of a reasonable person in being under the Queens peace with malice aforethought, express or implied.’’ The actus reus of murder is the ‘unlawful killing.’ Some killings are recognised by the law as being justified. For example a person who kills in self-defence or in the prevention of a crime, provided that the force used was reasonable in the circumstances, will not be guilty of an unlawful killing. However a criticism of this is that the ‘reasonable’ force used in self-defence or in the prevention of a crime is subjective to each individual and it depends on how scared each person would be in that circumstance for example a woman who is quite confident and fearless could be attacked on the street by a man and she just pushes him away and runs however a woman who is extremely terrified in the situation could react more irrationally and hit him with a weapon such as an iron bar to get him away from her because she is so terrified, therefore it is hard to dictate to some-one what reasonable force is as reasonable force to me could be completely unreasonable force to another. A reform I would suggest for this would be to clearly set out guidelines within this as what would be considered unreasonable force so that it is not as subjective to each individual. The next part of the actus reus of murder is ‘a reasonable person in being’. A reasonable person in being is considered to be any person in being, a baby is only considered to be such when it has been fully expelled from its mothers body. A criticism I think of this is that this should be allowed. I think after abortion is made…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Sixthformlaw, (2008). Murder – Defences – Provocation. [online] Available at: <http://sixthformlaw.info/01_modules/mod3a/3_31_voluntary/04_provocation.htm> Accessed [2nd December 2010].…

    • 3562 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    As this was a case brought up by the state of Nevada, there were criminal charges that were filed against the defendant Taukitoku, those being three counts of murder with the use of a firearm as well as four counts of assault with a deadly weapon. The murder with the use of a firearm charges against Taukitoku were brought up for the killings of Charles Kelly, Derek Jensen, and Nathaniel Viljoen with a .380 Taurus semi-automatic handgun. The four counts of assault with a deadly weapon were for the killings of the three men and pointing the gun at Annetria Scott, another woman who was attending the party. Since Taukitoku’s trial took place in a criminal court, jury unanimity was required to uphold his guilt. Similarly, the state was required to prove that the evidence of Taukitoku’s crimes were beyond a reasonable doubt, i.e., a certainty of 98%, to be convicted.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adrian Crump Trial Case

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Manslaughter is a crime that is unjustified, inexcusable, and the intentional killing of a human being, whether it be involuntary or voluntary. This is the criminal charge that Adrian Crump from Jacksonville, Florida had to face. He shot a 15-year-old boy, around 2 in the morning, who was driving around shooting rocks from a slingshot. Adrian heard a noise in his home and thought it was a gunshot. He got up and checked it out, then went back inside and grabbed his gun as well as getting dressed. He then got in his car and pulled up behind the offender’s car, and shot the boy because he put his hands down, and he said he thought the kid was reaching for a gun. During the trial the prosecutor and defense team brought up the two sides of the story. We were asked how we felt about the trial and how we would find him. I took into consideration Adrian’s motivation or intention, self-defense, the witness’ statements, and crimes going on around the city.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What reasons does the prosecution give to support their conclusion? The prosecutors support of reasons where that Judi Arias was stocking Travis. Arias stole her grandparent’s gun to murder Travis. Also the day of the murder she rented a car and was using cans of gas so it seemed that she was never in Arizona. These evidence concludes for the prosecutors that Judi arias planed the murder of Travis Alexander.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On May 6, 2016 a police officer found himself facing a young African American holding a pistol. Police officer, Stephan Mader, was let go from his position weeks later for not shooting the African American with the pistol. Stephan Mader is suing the city because he does not think it is fair that he was let go for not shooting a person. The reason Stephan Mader did not shot the African American was because it seem that the guy, Mr. Williams, wanted to commit suicide by a police officer. Mr. William told Stephan to shot him. Stephan was trying to come down Mr. William until two other police officer saw Mr. William waving the gun and shot him dead. Then they notice that the weapon that Mr. William had was not loaded. A country prosecutor had…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The kid would have to be guilty, there was enough proof to prove he was guilty. The kid should be guilty because there was so much proof that he was guilty that its ridiculous. If the kid wasn’t guilty he could have had so much evidence to prove he wasn’t including the pockets that had the hole in them or the movie ticket he had when he watched the movie at the theaters. He didn’t have the movie ticket so he couldn’t prove he was at the movies at the time of the killing. He didn’t have the pants or whatever he was wearing that had the holes in the pocket to prove he lost his switch blade in there.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (a) Bill will be charged with murder. As Bill has committed the act of causing Tony’s death, the actus reus of the cirme will be established. The mental element of the offence is also straightforward as Bill very obviously had the intention of killing Tony.…

    • 3193 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics