Preview

Actus Reus

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3820 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Actus Reus
Criminal Liability

Actus reus

The actus reus of a crime is the voluntary, deliberate act of the defendant. seen in the case of Hill v baxter 1958- in this case the court gave examples in a situation where a driver of a car would not be driving voluntary e.g. being stung by a bee and being hit on the head by a stone.

The actus reus is any act of the defendant that is unlawful and has the consequence of causing injury to the victim that the law classifies as a wound or grevious bodily harm.

Involuntary acts

Everybody performs involuntary acts, such as closing their eyes whilst sneezing. if a strong person holds a knife in the hand of a weaker person and uses the knife to stab another person, then the weaker person could not be guilty of stabbing the victim. such actions would not form the actus reus of a crime and so a defendant could not be guilty.

Omission

an omission is a failure to act. the law only makes a person liable for his failure to act where he has a duty to act. the duty can arise when.

• Where a person contract requires him to act. Pittwood 1902- gatekeeper failed to close the crossing gate. hay cart hit by a train: one person killed and one injured. failed to carry out his contractual duty.

• When a person takes on a duty voluntarily. Stone and Dobinson 1977- allowed stones elderly sister to die from neglect, she was anorexic and stayed in her room. failed to carry out the voluntary duty of care they had taken on.

• Where a persons public position requires him to act. Dytham 1979- uniformed police officer saw man being kicked to death. Did nothing and drove off. Failed to carry out his official duty.

• Where a person fails to minimize the harmful consequence of his act. Muller 1983- squatter started a fire by accident but did nothing about it. Found guilty of arson. Created a dangerous risk to others then failed to do what a reasonable person would have done. creating the risk meant he owed a duty of care.


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Duty of Care

    • 1719 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A negligent act could be unintentional but careless or intentional that results in abuse or…

    • 1719 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Examples Of Mens Rea

    • 77 Words
    • 1 Page

    1) In a criminal act two parts are to be considered the Actus Reus in which the physical act of the crime occurs for example a pedestrian gets killed by a truck while crossing the street in a green light this involuntary act. Mens Rea is a guilty mind where a pedestrian gets killed by a truck, which crossed red light. This is considered manslaughter and therefore the truck driver could face 25 to life in…

    • 77 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A negligent act is an unintentional but careless act which results in loss. Only a negligent act will be regarded as having breached a duty of care.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Act – An Act is the physical actions the defendant took to commit the crime.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr Guzha

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Actus reus is the physical element of a crime .It can be the physical element of a crime. It can be an act or a failure to act (an omission) or a state of affairs. In most cases the actus reus will be something the defendant does, but there are situations in which failure to act is sufficient for the actus reus. These are set out at section 2.2 ‘ state of affairs’ cases are very rare.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Law

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An interesting case that was currently brought before the Supreme Court was Missouri vs. Frye. I found this case interesting due to the injustice that was provided by Frye’s counsel, and that Frye insisted on committing the same crime over and over again even though he knew he had an open case concerning driving under a suspended license. There were many sources and jurisdictions related to criminal law that also relates to this case. Criminal liability is when one takes responsibility for committing a crime, and accomplice liability is when someone helps someone commit a crime. Actus reus means guilty act, mens rea means guilty mind, and concurrence means the equality of rights. Actus reus and mens rea are both necessary in order for a defendant to prove criminal liability.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Liability

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The actus reus of this offence is any act which causes the victim (v) to apprehend an immediate infliction of unlawful violence (iiuv). No force need actually be applied, creating a fear is sufficient, as was illustrated by Logdon and Lamb. The v must fear that violence threatened is immediate, in Smith this was held to mean as part of the current activity, when the v was separated from the defendant (d) by a glass window.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pa201 Unit 3 Assignment

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Breach of duty is defined as “the violation of a legal or moral obligation; the failure to act as the law obligates one to act; especially a fiduciary’s violation of an obligation owed to another.” Black’s Law Dictionary 214 (9th ed. 2009)…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    ii. And result crimes (series of events) – a forbidden consequence results from the physical conduct (eg. A death). Usually you have to prove Mens Rea for all parts of the series of events (eg. Murder – intention to do the act and intention to cause death)…

    • 991 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sef Gonzales Report

    • 1891 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In order for a crime to occur, both elements of the crime, Actus Reus and mens rea must be present. Actus Reus and mens rea are legal terms used to define a crime. Both elements must be present for an accused to be found guilty of a crime (except for strict liability). Mens rea means that the person must have had a guilty mind at the time of committing the crime- that is they must have intended to commit the crime.…

    • 1891 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Long Island Railroad). Negligence is the legal term given to actions that breach the duty of care that one owes another according to the law. The court considered that the defendant did not owe a duty of care to Helen Palsgraf, and therefore no negligence was committed. The court found that the risk of the harm was unforeseeable. According to The Legal and Ethical Environment of Business, “If the risk of harm is foreseeable, then the duty exists” (2014, pg.224). The court found that the actions which occurred were not only unforeseeable in to the objective observer, but also to Helen Palsgraf. This is to say that the risk was unforeseeable to an objective or reasonably subjective person in her position. The court found that the proximity of the plaintiff to the cause of action was irrelevant. Long Island Railroad actions or inactions caused no negligence to Helen Palsgraf. Even if there was negligence toward someone else, this is not a basis for a claim by Helen…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    • any person, other than a public officer or employee acting within the course and scope of…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (as shown in the book) Figure 2–1 illustrates the relationship between mens rea and actus reus. Criminality exists when the two concur and where no defense, as characterized in the figure, exists. Defenses in this figure refer to the zone of individual liberties over which governments have no authority to regulate and to those instances where other factual or legal defenses free an individual from criminal responsibility. Hence, as discussed in this chapter, the essence of criminal conduct consists of a concurrence of a criminal act with a culpable mental state.” In the case of the shooting of Mayor Crespo, wife Lyvette ‘actus reus’ or the criminal act is the shooting of her husband. ‘Mens rea’ is the wife’s culpable (or responsible) mental state during the incident. A concurrence of the two – actus reus and mens rea is clearly observed in the shooting, and this clearly constitutes as crime. Whatever outcome this may have in the coming days or weeks, I will be one of many spectators who wait for the full story and final decision. One thing is clear; a crime was obviously committed at the night of the…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are three main levels of mens rea which are: Intention, Recklessness, and Criminal negligence Causation is a term referring to the relationship between the cause of the accused behaviour or actions and the effect of that, the result in committing the crime. The prosecution establishes this usually by proving the actus reus and also proving the substantial link between the act and the crime. During the investigation process the four young people were questioned as to their knowledge of the murder.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In considering how such a duty could be imposed on society, one would have to consider if such an offence would be a conduct, circumstance or consequence crime (perhaps a combination). Would the offence of failing to take reasonable steps arise from simply not acting; would certain circumstances be a benchmark as to what was a reasonable step to take? Or would the death or severe harm that came to the person in peril define whether the bystander had failed to take reasonable steps.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics