Preview

Active euthanasia

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
436 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Active euthanasia
Should active euthanasia be legal?

Imagine lying in bed every day, not being able to stand up, walk or even eat without the help of nurses, because of a terrible incurable illness, that destroys your body slowly. Imagine being dependent on other people for the rest of your life, getting weaker every day and knowing that it can’t get better, but only worse. This is the fortune of many old, but sometimes also young people, who were diagnosed with an incurable illness, like cancer and many of them are only waiting for salvation and would prefer to die quickly, dignified and in peace. However active euthanasia is not an option in Austria. Unlike Switzerland, Belgium and or the Netherlands, fatally ill patients don’t have the independence to end their lives, when they want to.

One of the main arguments against active euthanasia is the Hippocratic Oath, which amounts, that a doctor mustn’t harm an ill person. But does it mean that the patient has to be kept alive, whatever it takes, even if he is suffering a lot and there is no hope for recovery anymore? No, it doesn’t. Above all, doctors have to help their patients and act in their interest of health. If medication is not working and there is no hope for improvement left any more, a patient should be able to determine his own death.

We are more human to our beloved animals, than to our fellow men. If a dog is very sick or he is suffering too much, it is immediately taken to the veterinarian, where it can die in peace, without suffering too long. Why don’t human beings have this privilege?

In the Netherlands, active euthanasia has been legal for a long time and Doctor Roel Smeijsters confirms that the knowledge, that his incurable patients are able to decide their time of death, makes them calmer and reassured. Very often active euthanasia isn’t even necessary anymore, just because the patients know they could end their lives, if they wanted to.

“The dignity of men is unimpeachable” – that’s what it

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    To sum it all up, euthanasia should be allowed. One has the power of their life. Especially when it is causing them pain and the people around them. Having to either pay for another ill person in result to their family being ill when they are in pain can get very expensive. There are people who need the help and the money more than the people who only have a few months…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physicians who are in favor of Euthanasia state that to keep Euthanasia or assisted suicide illegal is violation of the patient freedoms. They believe that any competent terminally ill patient should have the right to choose death or refuse life-saving treatments. The U.S.Constution does not state that the government can keep a person from committing suicide. If Euthanasia was a right, patients could die with dignity and leave others with a positive memory and not what they had become. However, many physicians and medical staff have numerous reasons for prohibition the legalization of Voluntary Euthanasia. The main argument is the notation of the Hippocratic Oath that some doctors take by being part of a (PSA) and prescribing a lethal dosage of a drug could weaken the doctor-patient relationship because of the oath some doctors…

    • 2001 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consequently, this form of assisted suicide leaves most doctors skeptical of this treatment; for they have taken the Hippocratic Oath , which states that “I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody who asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect,” and believe euthanasia goes against…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Daniel Brock rationalizes his claim that voluntary active euthanasia is morally permissible with the use of two moral values. According to Brock, the moral values of self-determination and well-being support voluntary active euthanasia. As defined and detailed thoroughly in Brock’s argument on page 11 of his paper “Voluntary Active Euthanasia”, self-determination is equal to the ability to decide what decisions in and about your life will coincide with your concept of a good life, and well-being is equal to being content with your life. The formal argument that Brock formulates is reliant on these two moral values. The argument is as follows: “1. The values of patient self-determination and well-being support VAE, 2. So there is a good moral…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Any action or social policy is morally right if it serves to increase the amount of happiness in the word or to decrease the amount of misery. Conversely, an action or social policy is morally wrong if it serves to decrease happiness or to increase misery.” (RSL/Rachels, EL 247) The utilitarian argument is used to justify and condemn many policies, however, I believe that the argument is especially fitting when it comes to the matter of active euthanasia. Mercy, an action that serves to decrease the overall misery in the world, is an unquestionable sign of kindness and correctness. Mercy comes in many forms and is rarely frowned upon. Following this reasoning, why is mercy that takes the form of ending a suffering patient’s life considered…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia Ethical Dilemma

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Euthanasia is a social issue in today’s world because not only does it affect the lives of those who are terminally ill and/or comatose, and the physicians who have been entrusted with their care, but it also affects the patient’s ability to have control over their own life, whether they are aware of this decision or not, which is one of the reasons why euthanasia has become such a controversial issue around the globe. Caddell and Newton (1995) define euthanasia as “any treatment initiated by a physician with the intent of hastening the death of another human being who is terminally ill and in severe pain or distress with the motive of relieving that person from great suffering” (p. 1,672). Even though the concept of great…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Physician Aid in Dying

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The opposition of physician aided death says it is a violation of the Hippocratic Oath. The original Hippocratic Oath, created by Hippocrates prohibited euthanasia (Tyson). The…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the many reasons people oppose physician assisted suicide is because it violates the doctor’s Hippocratic oath. Yet, the Hippocratic oath has no legal binding and is based off of centuries’ old logic. It is not practical in today’s society and in the case of physician assisted suicide. Another reason people argue against it is that the doctors and families may give…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Hippocratic oath, “specifically notes that the physician will give no deadly medicine”(Fuller 11). Just like any other document with mandating guidelines, there is room for interpretations. If a physician is following the letter of the ‘law’, they would follow the literal interpretation of the words in the oath but not necessarily the intent of Hippocrates. Following the spirt of the ‘law’ in this case, could be not to cause a patient intentional harm or pain. The over arching idea of the Hippocratic oath is to “do no harm”. Josh Sanburn writes, “Since Hippocrates, doctors have taken their credo to do no harm. But what if a patient believes the treatment to keep them alive is more harmful than death?”(Sanburn 50) In the award winning documentary, “ How to Die in Oregon” Dr. Katherine Morris sheds light on a new outlook on “do not harm”. The documentary follows the last months of a terminal ill patient, Cody Curtis’s, life. Dr. Morris states, “ I think Cody taught me that first do no harm is going to be different for every patient. Harm, for her, would have meant taking away control and saying no, no, no, you’ve got to do this the way your body decides as opposed to the way you as a person decides”(Dir. Peter Richardson). Do no harm is different for every patient and stay alive though continual suffering can cause unnecessary harm to a…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia contradicts the main reason of being a physician. Doctors are known to be healers not killers and this could cause ethical issues. In Kirk Johnson’s letter on behalf of the American Medical Association (AMA) he addresses how euthanasia would make a negative impact. “The involvement of physicians in euthanasia heightens the significance of its ethical prohibition. The physician who performs euthanasia assumes unique responsibility for the act of ending the patient's life. Euthanasia could also readily be extended to incompetent patients and other vulnerable populations. Instead of engaging in euthanasia, physicians must aggressively respond to the needs of patients at the end of life. Patients should not be abandoned once it is determined that cure is impossible. Patients near the end of life must continue to receive emotional support, comfort care, adequate pain control, respect for patient autonomy, and good communication.” He stated an alternative to the suicide, which was that physicians should get the patient ready for his death and make him feel comfortable rather than just ending his…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people believe that euthanasia is a patient’s right. According to ProCon.org, “… a terminally ill person has a protected liberty interest in choosing to end intolerable suffering by bringing about his or her own death” (ProCon.org, “Top 10 Pros and Cons”). Claiming that everyone has the right to choose their death. The website also went deeper into the matter by bringing the Hippocratic Oath, “do no harm” (ProCon.org, “Top 10 Pros and Cons”). It…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Person's Right to Die

    • 953 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Physicians continue to face this ethical dilemma today. The American Medical Association said in one legal brief, ''For over 2,000 years, the predominant responsibility of the physician has not been to preserve life at all costs but to serve the patient's needs while respecting the patient's autonomy and dignity,'' Concurrently, the AMA opposes physician-assisted suicide. The Hippocratic oath still states: ''To please no one will I prescribe a deadly drug, or give advice which may cause his death.'' This moral reasoning of physicians is at the Conventional Level, in which the right behavior is living up to the expectations of family or nation, and conformity to personal expectations and social order.…

    • 953 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physicians and other medical caregivers have the obligation to maintain life, as sworn in the Hippocratic Oath which states: 'I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody if asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect'. The Hippocratic Oath is an oath stating the obligations and proper conduct of doctors, taken by those beginning medical practice. The Hippocratic physician rejects the view that the patient's choice for death can make killing him right. Helping a patient commit suicide directly disobeys the Oath. The official position of the Catholic Church in Rome remains that killing of a human being, even by an act of omission to eliminate suffering, violates divine law and offends the dignity of the human person.…

    • 2079 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Assisted suicide should be allowed as a valid option for anyone who is suffering a terminal illness. People don’t want to live uncomfortably or without use of all the functions that they currently possess. Individuals should be allowed to make the decisions on what is right or wrong for them, and that includes living or dying. Thus, people should be given the right to assisted suicide in order to end their suffering, reduce the damaging financial effects of hospital care on their families, and preserve the individual right and dignity of people to determine their own fate.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Animal Euthanasia

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the past few decades, there has been a big uproar regarding the topic of euthanasia in dogs. Euthanasia used to be a term used to end the suffering of a life by putting them in a painless and permanent state of sleep. I believe that today, the term ‘euthanasia’ when referred to dogs has transformed to a word used to justify the mass murder of dogs across the world. Most people will agree that the only time a dog should be put down is when it is sick or suffering from pain. I believe that if a dog is euthanized for any other reason, the person in control is guilty of committing an abominable act. They do not call dogs “mans’ best friend” for nothing. With proper training, every single dog has the potential of making a good house pet and becoming an important part of an owner’s life.…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays