Preview

Active And Passive Euthanasia Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
192 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Active And Passive Euthanasia Summary
In the reading, "Active and Passive Euthanasia," the author argues that there is no distinction between active euthanasia and passive euthanasia, and that even letting a person die through passive euthanasia can be just as cruel as intentionally killing someone (pp. 564-565).
One of the author’s main reasons to support his view is that the suffering that people experience when a physician withholds treatment can be just as painful, or even more painful, than actively killing someone (pp.565). The author also explains that, in terms of motives, killing is not necessarily worse than letting die (pp.565-566). Although both can be done with good intentions, like to relieve someone of their pain, both have the motive of terminating life. He also

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe euthanasia can be the most humane option for those suffering enough if the patient chooses it. I would say I am for active euthanasia. Passive euthanasia in some circumstances seems less humane than active because with passive the person is left to die slowly from lack of treatment or sustenance whereas active would put an instant relatively painless end to the pain. Active euthanasia should be administered only in special circumstances where the suffering is great and the patient has little time left to live. It needs to be distinct from suicide.…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 6 is about dealing with ethical questions regarding active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. The chapter begins with many examples in which suicide is clear and others where it can be puzzling. One example was about a truck driver that knew he was going to die anyway, so he stirs his runaway truck into a concrete abutment to avoid hitting a school bus that stopped on the roadway to discharge children. In my opinion, this is not a suicide case. The truck driver didn’t intend on getting killed nor did he want to die. Although he did stir his truck into a concrete abutment, it was only to avoid potentially killing the kids on the bus. The bus driver didn’t have the power to avoid his death, so he chose to safe the life’s of others. Another case was about how a…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Research Paper on Euthanasia

    • 2719 Words
    • 11 Pages

    One of the most hotly debated ethical issue of our time is one of Euthanasia. Euthanasia comes from the Greek words “Eu”, meaning well or easy, and “Thanatos”, meaning death. In modern terms it is the intentional premature termination of another’s life by direct intervention or by withholding care.[1] Within that it can be either voluntary (expressed or implied consent), or involuntary. The two sides of this debate are the rights of an individual to decide when he or she is to die, or the sanctity of life and the states responsibility to protect people.…

    • 2719 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John D. Arras looks at a situation which poses a patient suffering from uncontrolled pain by having the physician ignore their decisions amongst life and death. He mentions that physicians may contribute to “suicide and suicidal ideation” (page 478, column 1) which is statistically shown in over fifty percent of cancer patients who suffer from uncontrolled pain that is often brought on by untreated depression. In this situation however, if patient is given control of their own lives and obtain adequate psychiatric and palliative care to treat depression, it is assumed that most would lose interest in PAS/euthanasia. Using a similar example, there will always be a small amount of patients who may have pain that cannot be treated, for these patients J. Arras believes that present law on PAS/euthanasia can represent an impossible barrier to a distinguished and decent…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Daniel Brock rationalizes his claim that voluntary active euthanasia is morally permissible with the use of two moral values. According to Brock, the moral values of self-determination and well-being support voluntary active euthanasia. As defined and detailed thoroughly in Brock’s argument on page 11 of his paper “Voluntary Active Euthanasia”, self-determination is equal to the ability to decide what decisions in and about your life will coincide with your concept of a good life, and well-being is equal to being content with your life. The formal argument that Brock formulates is reliant on these two moral values. The argument is as follows: “1. The values of patient self-determination and well-being support VAE, 2. So there is a good moral…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Debate Resolution: If voluntary euthanasia is legalized in the U.S., it will have primarily positive and acceptable social consequences. Consequently, it should be legal…

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The argument that has sent the world into a tailspin is whether or not people suffering from terminal or excruciatingly painful illness have the right to take their own lives by way of physician-assisted suicide. Proponents contend that what one does with one 's life is of no consequence to anyone else -- that it is humane to allow someone to be relieved of constant – if not unbearable – discomfort. On the other hand, critics claim that the act of euthanasia is nothing more than a fabricated form of murder. Indeed, both sides have pertinent points when it comes to understanding and assessing the conflict, but euthanasia supporters have a significantly stronger argument when considering the bigger picture. Clearly, physician-assisted suicide is not only the right thing to do for someone seeking such a decision, but it is ethical and humane for a physician to abide by the patient 's wish.…

    • 2793 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    PHI208 QUIZ WK1

    • 1304 Words
    • 16 Pages

    These are the automatically computed results of your exam. Grades for essay questions, and comments from your instructor, are in the "Details" section below.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to James Rachels, in his essay “The Morality of Euthanasia,” the American Medical Association’s Conventional Doctrine in Euthanasia is false. The Conventional Doctrine states that there are certain situations in which letting someone die or passive euthanasia is morally permissible, but killing a patient or active euthanasia is not. For instance, in many circumstances a doctor can withhold treatment and will do nothing wrong if the patient were to die, but if the doctor were to provoke the death of the patient then it would be morally wrong. Rachels’ final goal is not to take a stand on the rightness or wrongness of euthanasia but instead show that if passive euthanasia is morally permissible then active euthanasia is also morally permissible. (define euthanasia)…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Any action or social policy is morally right if it serves to increase the amount of happiness in the word or to decrease the amount of misery. Conversely, an action or social policy is morally wrong if it serves to decrease happiness or to increase misery.” (RSL/Rachels, EL 247) The utilitarian argument is used to justify and condemn many policies, however, I believe that the argument is especially fitting when it comes to the matter of active euthanasia. Mercy, an action that serves to decrease the overall misery in the world, is an unquestionable sign of kindness and correctness. Mercy comes in many forms and is rarely frowned upon. Following this reasoning, why is mercy that takes the form of ending a suffering patient’s life considered…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two of the most controversial things in the world of medicine, Physician-Assisted Death and Euthanasia. For starters what do these two terms mean, why and how are they so different? Physician-Assisted Death a.k.a. Doctor-Assisted Suicide is the voluntary termination of one's life who is terminally ill by administration of a lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance of a physician. Doctor assisted suicide is currently legal in the following five states, California, Vermont, Montana, Oregon, and Washington. Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma. Any form or practice of Euthanasia is prohibited in all fifty states and is legal in select few countries…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia is the practice of intentionally ending someone’s life so that any type of suffering and pain will come to an end. It was first seen throughout 5th century B.C. and 1st century B.C. by the ancient Greeks and Romans. Prior to Christianity coming forth, ancient Greece and Rome had a tolerance for assisted-suicide. Few physicians followed the Hippocratic Oath which “prohibited doctors from giving ‘a deadly drug to anybody, not even if asked for,’ or from suggesting such a course of action” (Dowbiggin). During this time there was much support for euthanasia rather than prolonged suffering. This led many physicians to comply with a patient’s request and administer the poisons. Later on between the 12th and 15th century, with the rise…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some say that doctors main priority should be to help a patient and make sure they get better, not help them end their life. “They rightly seek to eliminate disease and alleviate pain and suffering. They may not, however, seek to eliminate the patient. Allowing doctors to assist in killing threatens to fundamentally corrupt the defining goal of the profession of medicine” (Anderson). While this article focuses on the cons of allowing PAS, it does not necessarily go against the idea of doctors helping their patients, because by allowing them this end of life option they are alleviating pain and suffering to their patients. And doctors are not allowed to offer PAS to any of their patients, so they are not forcing it upon them as an option, the patient must go to them and specifically request it in order to be administered the drugs. “Patients can refuse or doctors can withhold particular treatments that are useless or causing more harm than good. But in deciding that a treatment is useless, we must not decide that a patient is worthless” (Anderson). Patient happiness and health should always be a top priority, and sometimes that means stretching the limitations of the doctor code of conduct to get their patients what they really want, which could in some cases be…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Voluntary Active Euthanasia is a controversial subject, Does one have the right to end their own life? According to Peter Singer in “Voluntary Euthanasia: A utilitarian Perspective,” Voluntary Active Euthanasia is morally permissible under certain circumstances. If and only if certain requirements are met by certain parties can the process of voluntary active euthanasia be completed.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With passive euthanasia, the patient will be in “terrible agony” until the patient’s body finally gives up. For this purpose, physician-assisted suicide should be legal since it is a moral alternative. The physician is doing their job because they are respecting the patient’s wish if they choose not to prolong their pain any longer. With the legalization of physician-assisted suicide, the physician will be able to administer a prescription of the lethal drug dosage that the patient will take on their own to end their life. Physician-assisted suicide is a better alternative to passive since the patient will die “relatively quick[ly] and painless[ly],” (Rachels, 1975, 79) rather than in “terrible agony” (Rachels 1975,…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays