Preview

act writing prompt

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
456 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
act writing prompt
Issues with schools disciplining students outside of school grounds and unaffiliated with anything to do with the school have been an uprising the past few years. Recently a 12 year old girl was expelled from her school for making a remark about a hall monitor on Facebook. The school saw this as an act of bullying and punished her so issues kept happening with the girl the girl was suspended, the girl sued the school for violating her first amendment (freedom of speech), and her fourth amendment (unreasonable search and seizure). Therefor the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) states that the school was wrong and they have no right to punish off of school property. I stand for the girl; the school has no right to do what they did. In this case the girl was on Facebook and she posted that she “hated” a hall monitor who had been “mean” to her. The school found out about this post and the principal said that this act “constituted bullying”. The girl was simply given a detention. But when she went home the school was watching her Facebook again. Keep in mind she isn’t on school property or using any school connections. So she posted another comment, cursing that someone had told the school. The school which was watching her posts gave her an in school suspension and prohibited her from attending a class ski trip. This is where the ACLU stepped in stating that the school violated the girl’s first amendment of free speech. Secondly the school administrators had forced the girl to hand over her Facebook login credentials, after her and a boy were caught talking about sex. The ACLU states that there was no warrant to be looking into the girls Facebook. Also the mother of the girl did not say that they could search her Facebook. The ACLU said that this violates the girls’ fourth amendment right of privacy, and fourth amendment right of unreasonable search and seizure. On the other side the school states that “12 year olds aren’t even aloud to be a member of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    However, this protection is not without limits. There is still a professional duty to protect confidentiality and not cause disruption to the operation of a school. Basically, teachers do not have carte blanche freedom of speech if it can be proven to be or create a substantial disturbance within the school community. Because Pickering was able to show the court that he thought his statements were true, I believe there seemed to be a lack of malice on his part. The Board of Education asserted at every level of the court system that his statements were unjustified, and damaged the reputations of its members (Essex, 2012). I agree with the decision and think the case lacked the evidence that his words even if untrue or unfounded really affected students and school as a…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bethel V Fraser

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On April 26, 1983, Matthew Fraser gave a speech nominating another student for an elected position. The speech was given to about 600 fourteen year olds that chose to attend this assembly. The speech contained sexual innuendo. Before giving the speech Fraser received advise from several teachers that he should change the speech or not give one at all. But he refused to take their advice (2). The next day, he was called in to an administrative office and was suspended for three days and was told he would not be able to give his speech during graduation even though he was at the time the salutatorian. The family of Fraser filed a grievance with the Pierce County school board, but the officer upheld the suspension. In response, to that decision Matthew’s father filed a case against the school district. The District Court ruled that the student’s First Amendment right was infringed upon. The students was awarded a monetary judgment and allowed to give his graduation speech. Later, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment of the District Court (4). Later, the US Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals in a 7-2 vote to reinstate the suspension, saying that the school district's policy did not violate the First Amendment (3).…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should a principal or other school authority be able to silence other forms of student speech? If so, under what conditions? How does speech by an individual student differ from speech by the school newspaper?…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I, _______, agree that school officials should be able to remove student publications when they believe material is unsuitable for younger students, or for reasons it could possibly disrupt the educational curriculum. If students are allowed "freedom of speech" other students could be slandered indirectly such as what occured in this case or fights may ensue due to disagreements. Yes, we as Americans have rights to speak our minds freely, but most students are minors and are under the supervision of the school. The school has the right to control what is allowed within its walls and must moniter students' doings in order to ensure the safety and eduaction of all students.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Josh Renville, an 18 year old student attending Fargo North High School has petitioned against the school in question for violating his first amendment right to freedom of speech. The school prohibited Renville from using a photograph in which he his holding his favorite rifle for his senior portrait in the yearbook. Renville claims that by prohibiting the photograph, the school is infringing on his rights to freedom of symbolic speech. Despite Renville’s claims, the actions taken by the administrators at Fargo North High were completely constitutional. Fargo North was acting well within their constitutional limits to promote the ideals of public education, to properly monitor any media that would have been associated with the school, and to limit any action that inherently interfered with the school’s disciplinary…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason why judges voted YES is because they say that Childrens are not necessarly guaranteed the full extent of the First Amendment. They add that the students did not shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the school.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hazelmeier Case Summary

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It was simple to me. The school newspaper is about representing the whole school, not individual students themselves. Both sides could agree that the students were presenting their own views, but then this is where the sides start to split. The minority believed that since the students were expressing their own views, that the Tinker standard should apply. But, this was not applied because the students are not suppose to use the school newspaper as a public forum for discussion. The school newspaper is suppose to represent the whole school, and not just those writers. Therefore, the principal was doing nothing wrong by restricting the student’s rights when he censored and prevented the release of the articles in the…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addressing your second question of Donnie’s rights being violated due to his writing “Zero Tolerance Sucks” on his t-shirt, A public school has an obligation to provide a safe and secure educational environment for all students. This is a very sensitive subject in our society. What one person deems to be perfectly fine is seriously offensive to another. School boards across the country are having to monitor and…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does taking the right for students to wear armbands to a public school violate students’ freedom of speech protections from the First Amendment? Did the…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Garner Vo-Tech Case Study

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Schools may regulate student speech that results in a material and substantial disruption within the school. Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., 393 U.S. 503, 509, 513 (1969). Garner Vo-Tech must show either that there was an actual disruption within the school or that officials reasonably anticipated a material and substantial disruption was likely to occur. Alternatively, the Court could expand the exception found in Morse that waives the disruption requirement and include speech that calls for the bullying and harassment of a specific student. Morse v. Fredrick, 551 U.S. 393, 407 (2007).…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap English Prompt Writing

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The author, Seamus Deane, discusses the two greatest pieces that stood out and impacted his own writing style. He does so not by just writing down what exactly changed his mind, but rather presenting his two encounters and the following reactions.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    - court agreed that searches by school officials do not violate the Fourth Amendment as long as the official has “ reasonable grounds to believe that a student possesses evidence of illegal activity or activity that would interfere with school discipline…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nfl Pros And Cons

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The school will win the debate due to the fact that the school, of which the players were on was a private school. Since its a private organization they have the ability to enforce whatever it declares right or wrong, regardless of what the Bill of Rights states. It is due to this that the school-the private school- will win the case. It, just like the NFL is a private organization, and can enforce whater they find just within their system and will win. However, if this case were in the perspective of a public school, where the students are being punished for kneeling, have the ability to sue since there is state action- the schools decisions- and also they most likely will win since their was isn't any forms of negative freedom of speech. The court case will be brought up to the supreme court since there was state action(the school). The students will most likely win since the freedom speech can be considered as a type of silence, which does not perform any form of negative connotation. Since it wasn't negative the students will most likely win the…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all, Schools should be less harsh when it comes to disciplining students. Schools are punishing students for the most absurd reasons. For example, a New York girl was hauled out of class in handcuffs. Why? Because apparently she wrote on her desk with a erasable marker. In Houston, Texas an eighth grader was suspended for wearing rosary beads in memory of her late grandmother and the school insisted that the beads interpreted as gang involvement. The rules are too harsh and it seems like a child can't go to school without offending someone there. To me, this is completely ridiculous, students need to have a good learning environment in order for them to learn. With rules and policies like this, students might be too busy worrying about breaking rules to focus on whats really important and the whole reason why they're at school, their education.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cyberbullying is not a disruptive factor to school systems as the public school systems are making it out to be. In the J.S v. blue mountain school district case, J.S created a Myspace profile about her middle school principle, the profile did not include the name of the principle or the school name just a picture of him. Students of course at the school talked about it but they have that right according to the 1st amendment it is the right to free speech. I feel that what she did didn’t cause harm to the principle or physical dangers of other students merely a simple joke. I feel that for her being suspended was an unreasonable action. The facts simply do not support the outcome that the school district could assume it disrupted any school ordinary day functions.…

    • 501 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays