Preview

Act Utilitarianism

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2703 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Act Utilitarianism
Ethics The field of ethics ( or moral philosophy) involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong behavior. Ethics is the philosophical study of the moral value of human conduct and of the rules and principles that ought to govern it and there are two levels: on individual level and on society level. On individual level is a person’s own moral beliefs i.e. what he accepts as right and wrong, good or bad. For example, vegetarian and non-vegetarian and on society level is norms and standards accepted by a society. The word ethics derived from Greek word, ‘Ethos’ which means customs. Ethics is basically the philosophical study of morality and the word moral is derived from a Latin word ‘mores’ which means manners. …show more content…
Act utilitarianism give importance in consequences of an action where concerns with only the pleasure and happiness. Comparably rule utilitarianism is if an action is accordance with a rule, it is said to be right.
…further more there are two main utilitarian who proposed two different answers to this. Jeremy Bentham said “pleasure” and gave importance to consequences of an action which brings about pleasure. Where as John Stuart Mill said “happiness” and have added that happiness is not merely a sum total of pleasure.
…Jeremy Bentham have proposed the fundamental norm of hedonistic utilitarianism : An act is right if it brings about pleasure and an act is wrong if it brings about pain. John Stuart Mill gave the fundamental norm of Eudemonistic Utilitarianism : An act is right if it brings about happiness and wrong if it brings about
…show more content…
to B, nature has placed man under the guidance of two sovereign: ‘Pleasure and pain’. He said “man is a pleasure seeking and a pain avoiding animal.” Whatever brings pleasure is good and whatever brings pain is bad. And our duty is to maximize the balance of pleasure nor pain in life. This position B called the principle of utility

Aristotle’s conception of eudaemonia

The Keynote of Aristotle’s ethics is struck in the first sentence of his great work “Nichomachian Ethics”- ‘every art and every inquiry, every action and choice, seems to aim at some good; whence the good has rightly been defined as that at which all things aim. All actions aim at something other than itself and from its tendency to produce this it derives its value.’ Aristotle’s ethics is definitely teleological morality for him consists in doing certain actions not because we see them to be right in themselves but because we see them to be such as will being us nearer to the ‘good for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The theory behind the philosophy of Utilitarianism stems from a man named Jeremy Bentham. In Bentham’s essay The Utilitarian Calculus, he endeavors to document suffering on the basis that man at his core is purely hedonistic. “Motivational hedonism is the claim that only pleasure or pain motivates us.”(Moore) To Bentham, beings controlled by pleasure and pain bear the moral responsibility to limit pain and maximize pleasure to its greatest extent. He had advocated for the…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bentham said: ‘the principle of utility aims to promote happiness, which is the supreme ethical value… An act is right if it delivers more pleasure than pain and wrong if it brings about more pain than pleasure.’ To help people choose what would have the best possible consequence, Bentham provided a way of measuring it. This is the ‘hedonic calculus’. There are seven elements: the intensity of the pleasure; the duration of the pleasure; the certainty of the pleasure; the remoteness of the pleasure; the chance of succession of pleasures; the purity of the pleasure and lastly the extent of the pleasure. Bentham invented this to help people weigh up and measure how much pleasure an action will produce. Bentham was interested in the ‘greatest good…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pleasures and pain contribute in determining the classification of one’s actions. In Mill’s Utilitarianism, he examines what determines an action to be considered right or wrong, his own version of the hedonistic utilitarianism argument. He claims that these qualities, including the quantity, are an important factor in determining, when included in the consequences, the criteria of an action. The consequences are significant in determining the results of one’s actions.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Webster's New World Dictionary, ethics is "the study of standards of conduct and moral judgment. The system of morals of a particular person, religion, or group. Morals, "is dealing with or capable of distinguishing between right and wrong, of teaching or in accordance with the principles of right and wrong" (2002).…

    • 3189 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this paper I will argue that Aristotle’s conception of eudaimonia disproves Mill’s utilitarian view that pleasure is the “greatest good.” The purpose of this paper is to contrast Aristotle’s and Mills views on the value of happiness and its link to morality. First I will describe Aristotle’s model of eudaimonia. Then I will present Mill’s utilitarian views on happiness and morality. Lastly, I will provide a counterargument to Mill’s utilitarian ethical principles using the Aristotelian model of eudaimonia.…

    • 1773 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Act utilitarianism and Rule utilitarianism are two forms of Utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism is when someone carries out any activity which is beneficial among most people, in spite of the community restrictions (e.g. Laws) as well as individual feelings. Rule utilitarianism is when someone considers Law and is anxious with equality. Anyone who is a rule utilitarian tries to find out what benefits majority through equality.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After discussing the first argument, I will now concentrate on the second critic views utilitarianism definition by Mill as insufficient mainly because of diverting the focus from the desired nature of pleasure to desirable aspect. According to this critic, the good actions are viewed as desirable that is thought to be wrong. However, this claim is insufficient in showing the weakness of utilitarianism. I defend utilitarianism against this claim because an individual must desire something for the same to become a pleasurable…

    • 83 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a further division between utilitarians; Act Utilitarianism and Rule Utilitarianism. Rule Utilitarianism, holds that one should always follow rules that tend to promote the general welfare of humans for example a rule might be not to killing people. Act Utilitarianism holds that one should always act to promote the general welfare.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx and Mills

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John Stuart Mill suggests that a person's ethical decision-making process should be based solely upon the amount of happiness that the person can receive. Although Mill fully justifies himself, his approach lacks certain criteria for which happiness can be considered. Happiness should be judged, not only by pleasure, but by pain as well. This paper will examine Mill's position on happiness, and the reasoning behind it. Showing where there are agreements and where there are disagreements will critique the theory of Utilitarianism. By showing the problems that the theory have will reveal what should make up ethical decision-making. John Stuart Mill supports and explains his reasoning in his book, Utilitarianism. Mill illustrates the guidelines of his theory. Mill defines utilitarianism as the quest for happiness. His main point is that one should guide his or her judgements by what will give pleasure. Mill believes that a person should always seek to gain pleasure and reject pain. Utilitarianism also states that the actions of a person should be based upon the "greatest happiness principle". This principle states that ethical actions command the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. Mill further explores the need for pleasure by noting "a being of higher faculties requires more to make him happy." . He acknowledges that some pleasures are more alluring than others are. He adds to this by making known that when placing value in things to calculate pleasure, not only quantity important but quality as well. Mill's criteria for happiness is easily understood, some statements that he gives are questionable. John Stuart Mill plainly laid out what he believes that the basis for ethical decision-making. First, the pursuit of pleasure is directly related to happiness. This idea can be easily accepted. It is natural for a person to focus his goals on things that will bring him pleasure. It would be absurd if someone's goal in life was to be poor and…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Modern utilitarianists have adapted the theory that you should make the greater number of people happier instead of discarding it which happened to many other theories. Jeremy Bentham is one of the more notable people to adapt utilitarianism as he had an empirical observation of happiness is the equivalent to pleasure and the absence of pain as people desire please and seek to avoid pain. He also thought that we should carefully measure any possible outcomes or consequences of an action before we decide on the choice we will make. His adaptation of the theory also changed many laws because it was thought to be to correct to consider the consequences. Bentham also created the Hedonic calculus which was helpful in determining measurements of pleasure, which can be used with the utiltitarian theory.…

    • 616 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act utilitarian acts are those that are consider to be right if there is maximized utility, and a rule utilitarian acts are those that are more of an idealistic code. Both of them are to be used in different decisions that are to be taken in life, and depending on the decision taken there will be consequences. (Mason, 2000)…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Act Utilitarianism considers the consequences of an act separately. That is to say, act utilitarians will apply the principle of utility to assess the action on a case-by-case basis and suggest that we must always perform the action that has the greatest net happiness (MacKinnon and Fiala). Rule Utilitarianism, on the other hand, considers the consequences of the act if it was to be performed as a practice or a general rule. Rule utilitarians believe that “a) a specific action is morally justified if it conforms to a justified moral rule; and b) a moral rule is justified if its inclusion into our moral code would create more utility than other possible rules (or no rule at all)” (Nathanson).…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Utilitarian ethics is the theory that the starting point of ethics is the principal that everyone, humans and creatures alike, want to enjoy pleasures and avoid suffering. Starting from this principal ethics becomes a calculation of how to balance the greatest pleasure over suffering. (Waller, 2008, p. 50) According to utilitarian John Stuart Mill, “Actions are right as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce pain or the reverse of happiness.” (Defining Utilitarianism) Jeremy Bentham's Hedonic Calculus of utilitarian ethics states that we should always try to perform that act that leads to the greatest pleasure. “This raises the question as to how we are to quantify pleasure; if we cannot put a value on the quantity of pleasure that an act…

    • 2840 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832), he argued that utilitarianism maximises pleasure for the most people such as pleasure and happiness and minimises suffering for the most people, such as pain and unhappiness. An act should only be done if it fulfils this requirement (Nathanson, 2016). Another aspect of utilitarianism is consequentialism, which holds the consequences of ones conduct. This impacts on the standard for judgement about the rightness or wrongness of that particular conduct (Haines, 2016).…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act Utilitarianism is the original and official form of utilitarianism which states that we must on any occasion act in the way which will produce overall consequences better than those that any other…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics