Preview

Act Utilitarianism Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
453 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Act Utilitarianism Analysis
Act utilitarianism is a utilitarian theory of ethics which states that a person's act is morally right if and only if it produces the greatest overall utility. In assessing a moral theory there are four adequate criteria which are: completeness, explanatory, practicability and moral conformation. For completeness, an ethical theory should support all meaningful moral claims, neglecting none of the claims. Next, there is explanatory power. For this assessment a theory should provide insight into what makes something moral or immoral. As for practicability, the theory should be useful to us in actual practice. Lastly, for moral conformation, it should give us correct answers to our moral questions. The better a theory explains and fulfils these …show more content…
Starting with completeness, act utilitarianism, is intended to explain what makes an act morally right or wrong. It seeks to maximize utility or produce the greatest good. It doesn't matter whether we know the people whose utility we are maximizing, everyone's utility counts equally. So if we consider an example that a terrorist plants a bomb that is about to kill 500 people. But the only way to save these people's lives is to torture the terrorist's innocent wife in front of him. An act utilitarian will say we should torture the wife because one innocent person being tortured is not as bad as 500 innocent people dying. Act utilitarianism evaluates actions based on whether that individual action will maximize utility. So here we see the problem act utilitarianism encounters in that actions may be considered morally right for the sake of maximizing utility but it may require to perform actions that can be immoral (from a normal societies perspective). For explanatory power, act utilitarianism clearly sates what makes an act right versus wrong. A morally right act is an act which would produce the greatest overall utility and wrong act is doing contrary. Next is practicability. To act utilitarianism, the moral claims and values of this ethical theory give a clear understanding (maximize utility) for how to practice it. Lastly, we have moral conformation. Referring back to the torture example, act utilitarianism’s answers don’t really agree with our clearest and most widely shared moral intuitions. This theory approves of wrongs like torturing and dishonesty that is surely not right from the view of many societies.
Act utilitarianism has its advantages but fails in other areas. In assessing act utilitarianism, it satisfied the criteria of explanatory power and practicability but was weak in the area of completeness and moral

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Act utilitarianism and Rule utilitarianism are two forms of Utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism is when someone carries out any activity which is beneficial among most people, in spite of the community restrictions (e.g. Laws) as well as individual feelings. Rule utilitarianism is when someone considers Law and is anxious with equality. Anyone who is a rule utilitarian tries to find out what benefits majority through equality.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The essential part of utilitarianism, whether it is Act or Rule, is to promote the greatest overall utility for the given situation. If we look in terms of Utilitarianism, one would be in favor of killing Tom to save the other four children. Even though, Tom would be killed, he would promote overall utility by saving four people through his one body. This reminds me a lot of the Trolley problem we studied in Unit five. They killed one man to save multiple. This may be considered immoral in a way, but according to Act Utilitarianism, the correct choice and the one that promotes overall utility would be to kill Tom and use his body to save the four siblings. In an Act Utilitarian’s mind, they would first think “In what way could I promote the greatest utility for every single person in the situation?” They must then think about the situation. The mother and father could either lose Tom, or they could lose their other four children. The Doctor could either kill Tom and save the four children or let Tom live and watch the others die…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Act utilitarianism (AU) is a fairly straightforward theory with an obligation to equality and impartiality. It comprises of mainly utility and disutility, or in simple terms utility equates to happiness or something worth pursuing and disutility equates to unhappiness or…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act utilitarianism allows anything—breaking promises, assassinating people, torturing—if that would produce the greatest utility in a particular situation. Rule utilitarianism even appears to make progress with the justice/human rights objection. Rule utilitarianism requires that a rule or practice…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shaw and Barry

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Two different forms of utilitarianism are described in our text. The first is called act utilitarianism. According to Shaw and Barry, act utilitarianism states that we must ask ourselves what the consequences of a particular act in a particular situation will be for all those affected (p.60).…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    First of all, an act (extreme) utilitarian concentrates on the effects of individual actions; therefore, act utilitarian believes that actions should result in the best overall result possible and produce the most usefulness. Usefulness is defined by…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Utilitarian ethics is the idea that the moral worth of an action is determined solely by its utility in providing happiness or pleasure as summed among all sentient beings. In laymen’s terms it means that the moral worth of an action is determined by its outcome or the greater good for the greatest amount of people. When I was doing my research into utilitarian ethics, I discovered there are many different types of utilitarian ethics, rule utilitarianism, act utilitarianism, two-level utilitarianism, motive utilitarianism, negative utilitarianism, average utilitarianism, and total utilitarianism. Although there are a lot of different types of utilitarian ethics, I will look at this problem using rule and act utilitarian.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism has been described as an act or a rule rather than a theory. We break this down into three parts:…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Utilitarianism theory suggests a person is in control of evaluating potential outcomes as a result of an action. The action is justified if the “ends justify the means” resulting in “the greatest good for the greatest number”. Unlike virtue ethics which is character driven, utilitarianism is action-based that is similar to deontology; the difference between utilitarianism and deontology rests within the motive of an action (Boylan, 2009).…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Definition of “Utilitarianism” is an ethical theory holding that the proper course of action is the one that maximizes the overall "good" of the greatest number of individuals. It is thus a form of consequentialism, meaning that the moral worth of an action is determined by its resulting outcome. The most influential contributors to this theory are considered to be Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill.”1 Utilitarianism is a simple theory and its results are easy to apply. It also allows for degrees of right and wrong, and for every situation the choice between actions is clear cut: always choose that which has the greatest utility. Utilitarianism is believed to have been derived from "Eudaimonia" which is the central concept in Aristotelian ethics. “In Aristotle's works, eudaimonia was used as a term for the highest human good, and so it is the aim of practical philosophy, including ethics and political philosophy, to consider (and also experience) what it really is, and how it can be achieved.”2…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is the ethical doctrine that the moral worth of an action is solely determined by its contribution to overall utility in maximizing happiness or pleasure as summed among all persons. It means that the moral worth of an action is determined by its outcome – “the ends justify the means”. The theory is founded on the ability to predict the consequences of an action. To a utilitarian, the choice that yields the greatest benefit to the most people is the choice that is ethically correct (Markoczy, 2002).…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is a teleological or consequentialist approach to ethics, which means that the action’s outcome is looked at. It is the greatest happiness principle. It is the consequences of an action which judge whether it is good or bad.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Historically, the foundations of utilitarianism diverged into two paths. One path was taken by John Stuart Mill, who saw utilitarianism as providing guidance to human beings by regarding higher and lower preferences. The other path was taken by Jeremy Bentham, whose hedonistic calculus made no comparative judgments about the worth of preferences but simply took them as a given (Brady, 1999). Utilitarianism is derived from the word “utility”. Utility can be defined as what is best in a specific case or as what is generally preferred in most contexts (Johnson, 2007). Both of which basically describe the two versions of utilitarianism, Act Utilitarianism and Rule Utilitarianism, respectively. Utilitarianism holds that actions and plans should be judged by their consequences (Sidgwick, 1874; Smart, 1973). In its classical formulation, utilitarianism claims that behaviours that are moral produce the greatest good for the greatest number (Mill, 1863). Decision makers are required to estimate the effect and consequences of each alternative on all the parties affected and to select the one that optimises the benefits for the greatest number (Cavanagh et al, 1981). From utilitarianism, we are encouraged to focus on the results or the consequences of decisions made, not the motives behind the decisions or…

    • 2324 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism can be classified in two distinct ways, act and rule. In these ways the utility principle is applied differently. Act-Utilitarianism is concerned with treating each moral situation as unique; therefore, applied the utility principle to each act. The Fundamentals of Ethics states, “Rule-utilitarianism is the version of rule consequentialism that says that well-being is the only thing of intrinsic value” (Shafer-Landau, Russ G-6). This means rule-utilitarianism draws up general rules based on the utility principle. Furthermore, rules are right if they produce greatest happiness for the greatest number.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Act utilitarianism is where only the results or consequences of the single act are considered. It is a single action being considered with a single outcome. Every time an action is taken every consequence needs to be taken into perspective. Act evaluates one action at a time and says that an action is good if it produces the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. The only question that the act utilitarianism asks is if it maximizes happiness for all. So if one options consequences create a greater happiness than the other option you have to choose that one. The act is morally right only if it creates the greatest happiness that no other option performed could do. An example of this would be if you had to choose between volunteering…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays