Top-Rated Free Essay

Act Utilitarianism

Good Essays
Topics: Utilitarianism
Act Utilitarianism
The theory of Utilitarianism was first developed by Jeremy Bentham who was a philosopher of the 18th century. Bentham developed this theory to create a modern and rational approach to morality which would suit the changing society.
Bentham’s theory Act Utilitarianism has many strengths and weaknesses. A Strength is that this theory is considers the consequences and happiness which an action has created. This is because Act Utilitarianism is a teleological theory where actions are based on results. For example if I splash cold water at someone to wake up for school this is a good action as it has good consequences because the person I splashed water on can go on to school and gain knowledge and this I will also create happiness. Another strength would be that this theory is always seeking the “Greatest Good for the Greatest Number”. For example if I was going to bomb the world with a bomb I planted in a secret location and the only way to get the information was to torture me. An Act Utilitarian would say that I should be tortured so that I could give the information on where the bomb was and this that would create the greatest good for the greatest number.
There are also many problems with Bentham’s theory as it allows cruel or sadistic pleasure as long as it out ways the pain. For example if ten sadists torture one child pleasure out ways the child’s pain making the action right in an Act Utilitarian eyes. Also if someone intentions are good but the consequence of their action is bad an Act Utilitarian would say this wrong even thought the intention was good. For example if I help an old man across the street and then he assassinates someone my action which was good becomes bad because of the consequence. Another weakness is that there is always a minority which will not benefit from an action and this could cause a great amount of pain for that minority and the pain of this minority could out way the pleasure of the majority but it is too hard and long to use the hedonic calculus in some situations. For example say there was a man called john normal calm guy then one day he finds out his daughter was raped by a man called max. Then john goes out and kills max. This situation would be too hard for the hedonic calculus to calculate as both men families felt pain and both men felt pleasure.
Overall I believe that the weaknesses out way the strengths of Act Utilitarianism as there are many situations that it would not be able to give an answer. Even thought Act Utilitarianism considers the consequences there are just too many weaknesses crushing this point. For example the hedonic calculus will take too long to find out whether an action is right or wrong in many scenarios.

Ayyub

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    ethical theory. For a discussion of John Stuart Mill's essay Utilitarianism (1861), see Utilitarianism (book). The Utilitarianism series, part of the Politics series Utilitarian Thinkers[show] Jeremy Bentham John Stuart Mill Henry Sidgwick Peter Singer Forms[show] preference utilitarianism rule utilitarianism act utilitarianism Two-level utilitarianism Total utilitarianism Average utilitarianism Negative utilitarianism animal welfare Abolitionism (bioethics) Hedonism…

    • 5761 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Act of Utilitarianism

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Act utilitarianism states that, when faced with a choice, we must first consider the likely consequences of potential actions and, from that, choose to do what we believe will generate the most pleasure. The rule utilitarian, on the other hand, begins by looking at potential rules of action. To determine whether a rule should be followed, he or she looks at what would happen if it were constantly followed. If adherence to the rule produces more happiness than otherwise, it is a rule that morally…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Act Utilitarianism

    • 2703 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Act utilitarianism give importance in consequences of an action where concerns with only the pleasure and happiness. Comparably rule utilitarianism is if an action is accordance with a rule, it is said to be right. …further more there are two main utilitarian who proposed two different answers to this. Jeremy Bentham said…

    • 2703 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Act Utilitarianism

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages

    morally justifiable/permissible only with situations, in which you can guarantee the best possible outcome. In this particular situation with the bomber, I believe we should take the Utilitarian-Act Consequentialism approach; and torture the bomber as an attempt to get him to reveal the location. Simply because, Act Consequentialism will focus more on the overall happiness that it will bring to all those involved. Seeing as how they have apprehended the bomber, and interrogated him to no avail. It is the…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act and Utilitarianism

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Assess the view that a religious concept of love is the most difficult to put into practice. (20 Marks) It can be considered that loving an individual in all circumstances can be a difficult thing to do. Most religions would say that love should be the central theme behind all of our actions. This may be an ideal standard for the world to have. However, would this be applicable in the world of politics, business and jury systems? For example, if love was to be the ruling norm of a jury system, would…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Assignment Paper 2 1. What do Act Utilitarianism believes? How do their beliefs differ from those of Rule Utilitarianism? According to Aggabao (2013), act utilitarianism (AU) capture that people must implement that deed that well bring about the greatest benefit for all people who concerned. Act utilitarianism believes that each situation is different from other situations. On other word each situation is unique and non-repeatable. So each individual has to try to avoid about the greatest number…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    differences between Act and Rule Utilitarianism Since it began, there have been two main exponents of Utilitarianism. They are Jeremy Bentham and J S Mill, and both of them base their own individual theories on the principle of utility, which defines something (an act, etc) dependent on if it achieves "the greatest happiness for the greatest number". This makes Utilitarianism a relativistic and consequentialist argument, as it takes into account only the outcome of events rather than the act itself as means…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act Utilitarianism Essay

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Act and Rule Utilitarianism There are a lot of differences and similarities between act and rule utilitarianism. Act utilitarian supports the principle of utility must be applied to each individual situation. The rightness or wrongness of an action is determined by its usefulness. This was Bentham’s idea when he established that pleasure and pain was important qualities for determining what was morally right or wrong. With Act Utilitarianism, you must decide what action will bring the greatest…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act utilitarianism is a utilitarian theory of ethics which states that a person's act is morally right if and only if it produces the greatest overall utility. In assessing a moral theory there are four adequate criteria which are: completeness, explanatory, practicability and moral conformation. For completeness, an ethical theory should support all meaningful moral claims, neglecting none of the claims. Next, there is explanatory power. For this assessment a theory should provide insight into what…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In order to be an effective advocate for Anna as a patient I need to use the rational given by the doctor in utilitarianism by shedding light on some gaps in his/her logic. The emphasis placed on the consequences of the situation are indeed important to consider, however they are unforeseeable and perhaps will not unfold in the same manner that the doctor perceives (Collier & Haliburton, 2015, p.12). It’s a possibility that this child will grow up to be an intelligent musician who is able to exercise…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays