Preview

ACC 492 Week 5 Case Study Assignment

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
442 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
ACC 492 Week 5 Case Study Assignment
This file of ACC 492 Week 5 Case Study Assignment contains:

An Interactive Learning Approach, (3rd edition), by Beasley, Buckless, Glover, and Prawitt: Case 12.4: Surfer Dude Duds, Inc.: Considering the Going-Concern Assumption Business - Accounting Learning Team

Case Study Assignment and Presentation

Resource: Case 4.1: Enron Corporation and Andersen, LLP: Analyzing the Fall of Two Giants in Auditing Cases

Complete the questions at the end of the case.

Prepare a 150- to 350-word response to the following questions:

· What are the principles of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct?

· What part(s) of the AICPA Code of Conduct was violated by Andersen? By any Enron employee who was a CPA?

Prepare 12-15 Microsoft® PowerPoint® slides, with speaker’s notes, illustrating your answers to the Case Study Assignment on Case 4.1.

When you enter your room on the first day of college, the best thing that you can do is to fraternize with your roommates. These are going to be the people that you spend the rest of the year with so it is very smart to make friends with them immediately.

This file of ACC 492 Week 5 Case Study Assignment contains:

An Interactive Learning Approach, (3rd edition), by Beasley, Buckless, Glover, and Prawitt: Case 12.4: Surfer Dude Duds, Inc.: Considering the Going-Concern Assumption Business - Accounting Learning Team

Case Study Assignment and Presentation

Resource: Case 4.1: Enron Corporation and Andersen, LLP: Analyzing the Fall of Two Giants in Auditing Cases

Complete the questions at the end of the case.

Prepare a 150- to 350-word response to the following questions:

· What are the principles of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct?

· What part(s) of the AICPA Code of Conduct was violated by Andersen? By any E...

https://bitly.com/12BS1yS

When you enter your room on the first day of college, the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The firm of Arthur Andersen LLP was founded in 1913 by Arthur Andersen and Clarence DeLany and named Andersen, DeLany & Co. The firm later changed its name to Arthur Andersen & Co. in 1918. Arthur Andersen LLP, based in Chicago, Illinois, was one of the “Big Five” accounting firms who perform auditing, tax, and consulting services for large corporations, such as Enron. In 2002, pending the outcome of the Department of Justice prosecution for obstruction of justice, the firm agreed and voluntarily surrendered its licenses and rights to practice auditing and other financial services in the United States. These charges stemmed from the firms handling of the auditing of Enron, an energy corporation, which resulted in the loss of over 85,000 jobs, devaluation of Enron’s stock from over $90 per share to pennies, and the bankruptcy of Enron. When Arthur Andersen was indicted, the firm lost almost all of its clients and faced over 100 civil suits related to its audits of Enron and other companies, such as Sunbeam and WorldCom. Additionally, Arthur Andersen’s reputation was so badly tarnished that no company wanted its name on their audit. In a 2005 Supreme Court ruling, the conviction against Arthur Andersen was unanimously reversed for serious flaws in the jury instructions. Specifically, “in the court's view, the instructions were far too vague to allow a jury to find obstruction of justice had really occurred. The court found that the instructions were worded in such a way…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Governance Capability in the Post-Enron Corporation Li, Y. (2010). The Case Analysis of the Scandal of Enron. International journal of business and…

    • 2798 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Arthur Andersen

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. What was the prime motivation behind the decisions of Arthur Andersen’s audit partners on the Enron, WorldCom, Waste Management, and Sunbeam audits: the public interest or something else? Cite examples that reveal this motivation.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Enron Disaster

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. What did Arthur Andersen contribute to the Enron disaster? Arthur Andersen (AA) contributed to the Enron disaster when AA consulting became its own separate entity, named Accenture. Revenues from consulting services surpassed revenue from auditing services. A natural competitiveness grew between the two rivals and this is where the problems began to start. Management held maximinizing revenues as their primary focus of success and promotions/bonuses were based on this factor. The CEO of AA, Joe Berardino, was an extremely aggressive pursuer of revenue. This set a negative culture at the top of the company and partners were expected to comply and atttain that demand. In addition, AA recognized the retention of audit clients as imperative and a loss of a client would be detrimental to an auditor’s career. This is where the issue in regards to auditors standing up to management and the client became unclear. AA was the only firm to allow the partner in charge of the audit to override a ruling of the quality control partner. The auditor had a fiduciary duty to the shareholders of the company being audited not to the company itself. Another major contributing factor was AA’s approval of Special Purpose Entities (SPE) that was used to generate false profits, hide losses and keep any undesirable information off Enron’s financial statements.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Overall scenario behind the corporate collapse in Australia In recent years, the failure of Arthur Andersen as one of the biggest auditing firm and its involvement in the issue of the unexpected collapses in Australia(HIH) and USA(Enron and WorldCom). The reasons behind the corporate collapses were regulatory failure, gross fund mismanagement, their excessive discounting, management’s self interest, price cutting strategy, lack of transparency and integrity in the corporation etc; (Tina et al. 2005). During the year 2001,…

    • 2671 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Phar-Mor Case

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The criminal justice department and the SEC were conducting their investigations during the same time period as the development of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX). In the early 1990s, Enron had become successful for their innovative practices of improve companies financials through structuring Special Purpose Entities (SPE’s). Under these complex transactions, Enron clearly masked their debt liabilities by selling assets between these limited partner shell companies and fabricated profits. It was hardly a coincidence that yet another Houston commodities corporation in connection with Arthur Andersen had misrepresentation and fraudulent reporting. This systematic corporate scheme led shareholders loss of $74 billion and caused employees and investors to lost retirement accounts. Several key management players, along with Andersen, were found guilty of fraud and most of them severed prison time (Willits; Nicholls,…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The next company up in the sacks is Sunbeam whereby Arthur Andersen audits failed to address serious accounting errors while they issued an unqualified opinion. Losses to the shareholders amounting to well over $4.4 billion and 1,700 people was jobless. Andersen paid $110 million out of an approved $141 million for the settlement of the case which they resolve the claims without admitting fault or liability. Andersen was also named in the case of Waste Management where they could earn additional fees in some “special work” which in this case overstating nearly $1.4 billion earnings. At first, Andersen identified those improper accounting practices and presented them but both Waste Management and Andersen went into a closed-door engagement with Andersen to write off those accumulated errors. Here there is a Self-Interest threat.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ptl Case Study

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages

    a. From the clients’ side The last straw which led to the demise of these two CPA firm were PTL club to L&H and Enron to Anderson. PTL Club had a very weak internal control. As it is pointed out in the case, whenever Jim Bakker needed money, he could just simply make a board member introduce a resolution for a bonus. Auditors could not find necessary documents to support expenses and revenue. Compensation was excessive far beyond the regulation of IRS. (Louwers, 867-872) Enron was engaged in aggressive accounting practices. It took advantage of the deregulation to inflate energy price. It utilized off-balance sheet financing vehicle to make its financial statement look far better than it was supposed to be. Both PTL Club and Enron were very risky clients. (Shirur, 4)…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    King Arthur Andersen

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. The prime motivation behind the decisions of Arthur Andersen’s audit partners on the Enron audits was not for the public interest but for profit and fear of losing clients. On page 109, an example that shows the need for profit instead of compliance with GAAP is, “This meant that at AA, the most sensitive decisions were taken by the person who was most concerned with the potential loss of revenue from the client in question,…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    September 26, 2013 Thomas Scholz What did Arthur Andersen contribute to the Enron disaster? Assistance! Arthur Andersen assisted Enron in deceiving stakeholders by revealing ways to generate false profits and hide losses through the development of Special Purpose Entities (SPEs). Enron’s consolidated financial statements did not depict or clearly give investors an accurate assessment about the company’s operating and financing activities. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) were not observed nor enforced; Arthur Anderson okayed/ condoned Enron to issue shares “as…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Merck Case

    • 4266 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Class 6 3. What was the prime motivation behind the decisions of Arthur Andersen’s audit partners on the Enron, WorldCom, Waste Management, and Sunbeam audits: the public interest or something else? Cite examples that reveal this…

    • 4266 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. There should have been measures in place to oversee the activities of accounting firms (Arthur Andersen), as they acted as both Enron’s “Consultant” and “Accountant”. These two must be separate organizations as seen as a conflict of interest.…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Resource: Case 4.1: Enron Corporation and Andersen, LLP: Analyzing the Fall of Two Giants in Auditing Cases…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Taking Clause- Kelo V. City Of New London Ct AC502: Regulation Taking Clause- Kelo V. City Of New London Ct…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    |CASE SUMMARY | Four days before the high-flying, energy-trading giant, Enron, disclosed a $618 million loss for the third quarter of 2001, an attorney for Arthur Andersen, the accounting firm that audited Enron’s books, wrote a memo to Andersen employees directing them to do something extraordinary.[i] Andersen had a policy of retaining the key documents behind an audit but getting rid of notes, drafts and memos that were produced during the audit. The attorney, Nancy Temple, wrote in an e-mail to David Duncan, the Andersen partner in Houston who oversaw the Enron account, “[i]t might be useful to consider reminding the [Enron] engagement team of our documentation and retention policy. ( It will be helpful to make sure that we have complied with the policy.”[ii] Duncan followed Temple’s advice, and the Andersen engagement team was ordered to destroy all audit material related to the Enron account except for the most basic work papers. As the destruction directive was being fulfilled, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) initiated a probe of Enron’s business activities. In order to secure needed accounting documents and information, the SEC issued subpoenas to Enron’s auditor on November 8, 2001.[iii]…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays