Preview

Absolute Monarchs: Louis 14th And Peter The Great

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
402 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Absolute Monarchs: Louis 14th And Peter The Great
Absolute Monarchs were eithere kings or queens who controlled the complete way of life in the country they ruled. Absolutism is the rule of one person over any given thing. The two rulers that showed absolutism in the documents are Louis 14th and Peter the Great. They were both absolute monarchs and both ruled over large territories. An absolute monarch has both positive and negative affects as a system or government. One positive attribute is organization. In document eight, Louis the 14th describes the necessity of organization when ruling a country. Without organization, a kingdom is vulnerable and its fall is imamate. With one absolute ruler, nothing is discussed nor fought over. As Louis 14th described, “The interest of the state
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Essay on 3 absolute monarchs: Louis XIV, Peter the Great, Frederick the Great
    • 797 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay on 3 absolute monarchs: Louis XIV, Peter the Great, Frederick the Great

    From 1638-1786, there were three absolute monarchs. Louis XIV, the sun king, built a splendid court at Versailles where he looked over the nobles. Peter the Great, the westernizer, changed Russia from a backward country into a great power. Finally, Frederick the Great, the enlightened despot, was full of tolerance and restraint and had good views on government. He improved Prussia many ways.…

    • 797 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Absolute Government
    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dbq Absolute Government

    A monarch's authority to govern should be absolute because then there would be less conflict between differing parties. In Document 3, Bossuet writes that the prince need render no account to anyone for the orders he gives. Instead of having to discuss why a decision was made or discussing what decisions should be made, an absolute ruler can make a decision and no one would question him. John Locke believes that if the commands of a prince were opposed it would unhinge and overturn all politics, and instead of government and order, leave nothing but anarchy and confusion (Document 4). Differing parties are not only government officials but also the people being governed. In an absolute government the people should not oppose the ruler. Bousett believes men must obey princes as they obey justice itself, without which there can be no order or purpose in things (Document 3). The authority of a monarch should be absolute because there would be less conflict between differing…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    King Louis XIV: The Perfect Example Of Absolute Monarchy
    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page

    King Louis XIV: The Perfect Example Of Absolute Monarchy

    1. King Louis XIV is definitely the perfect example of an absolute monarch. An absolute monarch is a ruler that possesses all of the power and Louis XIV was the most powerful king in all of French history. He took away power from nobility while also giving power to government agents with whom he checked in regularly with. This was a way to guarantee that he would not lose his own power. He did not have to take orders from anyone. He also believed that he and the state were the same, meaning that Louis XIV had total control over how France was governed.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Louis Xiv vs. Peter the Great
    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Louis Xiv vs. Peter the Great

    The 16th and 17th centuries, times of great change, were lived through by some of the most influential leaders known today. Two of which were Louis XIV and Peter the Great. These monarchs, different as the separate continents they lived on, shared only minor similarities such as absolutism and territorial expansion.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Peter The Great "Most Absolute Monarch"
    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Peter The Great "Most Absolute Monarch"

    Peter The Great should be granted the title of "Most Absolute Monarch" because he created a strong navy, recognized his army according to Western standards, secularized schools, administrative and territorial divisions of the country. Peter focused on the development of science and recruited several experts to educate his people about technological advancements. He concentrated on developing commerce and industry and created a gentrified bourgeoisie population. Mirroring Western culture, he modernized the Russian alphabet, introduced the Julian calendar, and established the first Russian newspaper. Peter was a far-sighted and skillful diplomat who abolished Russia's archaic form of government and appointed a viable Senate, which regulated all branches of administration, as well as making, groundbreaking accomplishments in Russia's foreign policy. Peter acquired territory in Estonia, Latavia and Finland; and through several wars with Turkey in the south, he gained access to the Black Sea. In 1709, he defeated the Swedish army by purposely directing their troops to the city of Poltva, in the midst of an unbearable Russian winter. In 1712, Peter established the city of St. Petersburg on the Neva River and moved the capital there from its former location in Moscow. Shortly after, St. Petersburg was deemed Russia's ''window to Europe.” Moving on, nobility was dependent on service. You were not just born into it you had to work for it. He thought nobles should work as civil officers or work in the military. Peter made it mandatory for his entire nobleman to shave their beards off. He wanted Russia to be westernized completely.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Absolutism And Constitutionalism
    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Absolutism And Constitutionalism

    An absolutist state, or absolutism is a form of government where the king had the entire control of the government. Absolutism emphasized the glory of the king and the sovereignty of the state and the king’s rights to stand above the interests of its subjects. The…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Louis XIV: Absolute Monarch
    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Louis XIV: Absolute Monarch

    Louis XIV of France ranks as one of the most remarkable monarchs in history. He reigned for 72 years, 54 of those in which he personally controlled French government. The seventeenth century is labeled as the age of Louis XIV; his rule has since been hailed as the supreme example of a type of government: ‘absolutism.’ When Louis died, sources say few of his subjects could remember any other monarch, for he epitomized the ideal of kingship. Louis XIV…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    King Louis Xiv of France
    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages

    King Louis Xiv of France

    From 1550 to 1800 was a time known as the Age of Absolute Monarchs. The Age of Absolute Monarchs was a period of European history when monarch had total control over laws and the power of their nation. Some well know absolute monarchs during this time period are Phillip II, Maria Theresa, King John, and Peter the Grate. An absolute monarch is a king or queen who has total control over all aspects of society. Another absolute monarch is Louis XIV. Louis XIV was born on September 5, 1638 in Saint-Germain-en-Laye. He stated to ruling at only age 13 and was also engaged in the Franco-Spanish war. When he was 22 he got married to Maria-Theresa which helped him become the most powerful monarch in Europe.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Who Was the Better Leader, Louis Xiv or Peter the Great?
    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Who Was the Better Leader, Louis Xiv or Peter the Great?

    Louis XIV and Peter the great became absolutism monarchs because of different reasons. Louis XIV inherited absolutism from his father Louis XIII but not created absolutism, in another word Louis XIV was forced to become the monarch of France because of his blood.【idea: Louis was born to be the lord】…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Louis Xiv Dbq Analysis
    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Louis Xiv Dbq Analysis

    In 17th-18th century Europe, the age of absolutism, absolute monarchs ruled most of Europe in countries such as Prussia, France, and the Holy Roman Empire. Absolute monarchs are rulers that have complete control over the government and its people. They claimed to rule by “divine right,” where their authority comes from God and they were above the law. The views of being a proper role as an absolute monarch differed very much between rulers and their subjects. Certain rulers had ideas that both the people and ruler should be united, some abused their power with no sympathy towards the people they rule, and the subjects that suffered from the rulings of the monarch had a completely different perspective than the rulers that were in power.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Comparing and contrasting peter the great and Louis XIV
    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Comparing and contrasting peter the great and Louis XIV

    Firstly,they were both autocrats,in that all decisions of state had to be approved by them.Secondly,they both wanted to curb the power of an ambitious nobility.However,they achieved this aim differently; Louis made his court at Versailles the centre of power,so the nobility had to spend all their time there if they wanted to have any influence.This kept them away from their own provincial power bases,making it hard for them to plot against the king.Peter on the other hand tortured and murdered any nobles he suspected of disloyalty.The main difference between the two was that Louis was ruling a cultural advanced,modern state - Russia under Peter was still very backward compared to major European states,so Peter worked hard to modernize Russia.Finally,both built up strong armies and used them for territorial expansion, thus increasing the prestige of their countries. Firstly,they were both autocrats,in that all decisions of state had to be approved by them.Secondly,they both wanted to curb the power of an ambitious nobility.However,they achieved this aim differently; Louis made his court at Versailles the centre of power,so the nobility had to spend all their time there if they wanted to have any influence.This kept them away from their own provincial power bases,making it hard for them to plot against the king.Peter on the other hand tortured and murdered any nobles he suspected of disloyalty.The main difference between the two was that Louis was ruling a cultural advanced,modern state - Russia under Peter was still very backward compared to major European states,so Peter worked hard to modernize Russia.Finally,both built up strong armies and used them for territorial expansion, thus increasing the prestige of their…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism in the Seventeenth Century
    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Absolutism in the Seventeenth Century

    Governmental systems in both France and England were greatly changing during the 17th Century. In England, absolute monarchies lost power while Parliament gained supremacy. France, on the other hand, saw Louis XIV strengthening his own offices and weakening both the Estates General and the local nobility. Absolutism, a political theory holding that all power should be vested in one ruler, was attempted by James I and Charles I of England, and Louis XIV of France. However, neither English king could establish an absolute monarchy as successfully as Louis XIV. Louis has been hailed as the extreme absolutist; he epitomized the ideal of kingship. "Seventeenth-century France, in contrast to England, saw both discontent among the nobility and religious pluralism smothered by the absolute monarchy and the closed Catholic state of Louis XIV. An aggressive ruler who sought glory in foreign wars, Louis XIV subjected his subjects at home to 'one king, one law, one faith '" (The Western Heritage 430). Louis succeeded in establishing an absolute monarchy while English rulers struggled with a power hungry Parliament.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Compare And Contrast Monarch
    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Monarch

    An absolute monarch is a ruler who governs alone and is not restrained by laws, a constitution, or custom. Two absolute monarchs were Louis XIV of France and Henry VIII. Louis XIV ruled from May 14, 1643 to September 1, 1715. He was a cultural icon and was called the Sun King. Henry VIII ruled from April 21, 1509 to January 28, 1547. Both Louis and Henry built up the military, regulated or controlled the religion, however only Louis XIV changed the power of the nobility.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Did Absolutism Build A Government
    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did Absolutism Build A Government

    Absolutism created a time of prosperity throughout the 1500s and the 1600s. At this point of history, absolutism was an efficient way of running a government. Absolutist leaders were vigorous, assertive and a potent symbol of authority. The amount of industrial growth in countries such as Russia was both efficient and effective because the power of authority was concentrated into one person’s hands. Absolutism enabled Peter the Great to modernize and adapt Russia for war, commerce and industrial growth. Additionally, absolutism gave people a powerful leader they needed to trust in and depend on for their country's sake. This type of regnant is most evident King James I of England and King Louis XIV of France. For example, King James…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Louis XIV vs. Peter the Great
    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Louis XIV vs. Peter the Great

    Louis XIV was a Bourbon monarch who ruled as the king of both France and Navarre with one of the longest reigns in European history with a span of over 72 years starting from when he was five years old. On the other hand, Peter the Great was a leader who ruled the Russian Empire and steered the Tsardom into becoming a huge empire which became a major European power. The efforts of Louis XIV and Peter the Great to gain absolute control over their respective countries were strikingly similar, yet had few differences as they each used forms of political, religious, and societal advantages towards national domination.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics