Preview

Abramowitz Polarized Public Analysis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1012 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Abramowitz Polarized Public Analysis
Abramowitz and Polarization to date Over the duration of this course, we have also been undergoing our current primary presidential election race, as Abramowitz has expressed in “The Polarized Public?” the polarization, the divide, that separates individuals as well as certain groups of people from each other and their beliefs has been evident in these debates. Many such as Fiorina and his coauthors may express the situation to be on the contrary, but Abramowitz even mentions that Fiorina fails to acknowledge that in Americans today “sorting by party is actually an important contributor to the growing ideological polarization among the public and especially among the politically engaged public” (pg. XV, Abramowitz, A.), it is evident that …show more content…
87, Abramowitz, A), according to ANES data in text for 2008. Whether you choose to single out states, counties or any other unit of measurement geographically, it is evident that the partisan divide is much deeper today as it was thirty or forty years ago. The red states and blue states seem to differ heavily in terms of “religious orientation”, the red states are the conservative, frequent churchgoers, as the blues are majority liberals who are not as frequent of churchgoers. According to a PEW article from 2013 “Those self-identifications reflect real and deepening divisions on a host of issues, the Pew Research report concluded: “Across 48 different questions covering values about government, foreign policy, social and economic issues and other realms, the average difference between the opinions of Republicans and Democrats now stands at 18 percentage points…”(Paragraph 4, Drew Desilver), thus signifying that the polarization has found deeper crevices to build upon. Most of what Abramowitz further details, the cultural divide, the geographic divide, the tea party movement all hold up as they explain how these factors have upheld the widening differences, the racial divide does not necessarily separate into reds and …show more content…
After reading “The Polarized Public? Why American Government is so dysfunctional” and further looking upon the PEW research center as well as ANES data base Abramowitz seems to have categorized the factors that influence the polarization, and it seems that the divided in belief and opinions have widened, and are now deeply influential to political parties and government fundamentals, as the polarization is found in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Incoming graduates of political science are aware of the restriction that the structure of the government imbeds, including the branches of the government generating unfair control of power in the executive branch, and partisan polarization. America’s basic construction of government, the three branches in parallel with the checks and balance system, creates problems such as a single executive leader inducing unfair policy making, and two main political party advancing partisan polarization. Partisan polarization is the ideology that an individual’s stance on political controversies are limiting of their party identification: republican, democrat. For example, controversies today revealing partisan polarizations are: equal reproductive rights,…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obama's Club Summary

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The list is as follows: political socialization; power, authority, legitimacy, and capacity; public opinion; media; political elites; political parties; elections; campaigns; presidential powers; among others. Each of these themes is presented and further elaborated with specific examples within the book. The themes complement the information presented in class by adding more specificity and depth. For example, in class, we briefly discussed power, authority, legitimacy, and capacity. In much the same way, the book showed how the lines between these concepts are often blurred and misunderstood, leading to dissensions and hostilities between the public and the elite. However, the book often offered more nuanced theories and explanations for the development of these overarching motifs, through the use of detailed examples and…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the readings of the four articles, they have address the problem with polarization in the people and cultural division. In Wilson's and Fiornia's articles they both mention how there is a deep division in America but Fiornia believes that the American public are more concerned about solving their political problems than the division. According to Wilson, he's view are some-what opposite, he believes that this cultural division will not fade since it was born when this country started. In Judis's article, he also mentions the division in the American public, but he chooses the popular group that has the media's eye which is the Tea Parties. He mentions how there is a division between the Tea Parties and the government and that some of their problems will fade. In the article of my choosing which was Partisan Mood: Polarization and the Dynamics of Mass Party Preferences, was about how the American public are categorized in political groups or parties due to their personal, political or religious views. Even though some of these articles are about the division between small political parties or the division of the Republicans and Democrats, there are still a division in America which can be harmful to trying to keep the United States united.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapters 10 through 12 in Political Polarization in American Politics explain what causes polarization and who is involved. This reading supports the ideas from chapter four which says that politics has become polarized on more issues than before due to conflict extension. Both Congress and the voters are deeply polarized, driven by two major factors, coming from a change in government and social interactions as well as a “long-term realignment”. Therefore, polarization comes from previous political beliefs and alignments, splitting Republican and Democratic opinions on how much government interaction should be present on policies such as welfare, tax cuts, and Obamacare. Increased competition leads to higher stakes in every political dispute,…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When involved with debates of any subject, there are always those people who never really seem to know where they stand. Throughout most of Gup’s life, he found himself flexible on a variety of opposing arguments. He states that he would linger in the ‘no man’s land between opposing arguments’, and wished to be drawn to one side, but found advantages and disadvantages in both. When he grew to accept his ‘confusion’, he realized that people like him are needed for the world to function. He, along with others like him, act as a bridge between opposing arguments, and without them, different groups would be completely divided. He believes that every argument needs a few ‘wobblies’ – those who don’t know where they stand – to hold the common ground. In our lives, there are always people around us who seem to know exactly where they stand, and don’t hesitate in making everybody in the general vicinity aware of it as well. It always seems that no matter how the conversation begins, it always gets drawn to the familiar subjects, whether intended or not. People who are very certain of where they stand can be drawn into conflict by the smallest of issues. This is especially true during election years. Being a liberal in a broadly conservative school, I agree with Gup, saying that we need the in-between people to keep a balance between arguments. When the level of certainty is high, it’s always good to have a few wobblies around. Wobblies show that strong opinions often get the better of us, and we shouldn’t focus so much on what divides us. I agree with the author’s opinion to a large extent. I, like the author, do not have a strong stance when it comes to certain topics such as political issues. And that is okay with me. The writing in this piece is very well done which makes sense because the author teaches journalism at a college. The author uses several good writing techniques like a well formed and obvious thesis in the first paragraph and excellent word choice. Words…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Polarization has existed for many years in the United States. The idea of polarization can be dated all the way back to 1787, in the Federalist Papers where James Madison discusses the dangers of that factions and groups can pose to the society. Madison's concerns stemmed from the uneasiness that political division has always existed in the United States. Even, Thomas Jefferson had his concerns with polarization and have seen firsthand of the factional disputes that occurred. So what does the term "polarization" mean in terms of politics? Polarization is when the public opinions go into two different extremes which create no middle ground or compromise. The polarization in politics is in regards to the division between organized groups and…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During our class discussion last week, we discussed about the polarization in our society in today’s world. In the reading by Abramowitz, he stated, “That problem was polarization. According to these observers, the sharp divisions between Democratic and Republican leaders were driving a wedge between party supporters in the electorate and alienating many moderate citizens from the political process.” This statement by Abramowitz shows us that Congress is still divided after decades of creating a political system to run America. We as a society need to be able to work together as a whole instead of being divided. There have been leaders in our society that tried to bring us together. However, no matter how hard they try to bring great minds…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Politicians have used polarization to create a divide and extreme dislike among both political parties. Political polarization occurs when government representatives begin to incorporate personal ideologies in an extreme manner during their political career. For example, a Republican politician begins to speak about their capitalistic and religious beliefs to their Republican audience. They are…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    At times parties differ on important facts such as if there is evidence of human behavior affecting change in climate. (Democracy in America,2014).Partisan polarization interferes with law making process which may also have adverse effects on policy making actors, more positive policy making theory have shown that inability to pass correct legislation allows greater independence judicial and executive actors of the policy making process. Polarization has two effects on policies; it either leads to creation of new policies or extinction of the existing policies. Due to dispersion in authority of policy making system in the U.S, development of public policies…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Daniel Westfall Essay Political polarization, defined as “the divergence of political attitudes away from the center, towards ideological extremes.” in the United States is a highly concerning trend, marked by strong ideological differences and escalating tensions between the two major political factions. Overall, there are many causes and effects of polarization, however, three key factors are the most important: the influence of Congress, demographic shifts, the impact of social media, and the importance of addressing these issues. Not only will the causes be discussed, but the consequences of polarization, including the demonization of opponents, political violence, and challenges in foreign policy, will be talked about. One of the primary causes of political polarization in the United States is the behavior of Congress and its impact on public debates…

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    American Voters

    • 1595 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “Just How Stupid Are We? Facing the Truth about the American Voter,” by Rick Shenkman is a book with an eye opening experience. It was one of the best-selling books on the market in 2008 for a different look into the political issues. By Shenkman asking such a forward provoking question, it automatically catches the reader’s attention. It has you go through an immense variety of approaches and opinions. According to Shenkman, Democrats and Republicans point fingers on who’s to blame for the 2008 presidential elections. Most people think it all had to do with the “bad Bush years” in administration, but Shenkman is convinced that it is “too easy to blame our mess on Mr. Bush” (Shenkman xi). Shenkman is questioning the American voter directly; he believes that we The People should be questioned for the root of the problem. Shenkman’s explains that he has five characteristics of stupidity, but the most important are; ignorance, negligence, and how the American voter depends on myths. (Shenkman 14).…

    • 1595 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In addition, during the 1960s, most partisan change in the South was accounted for by people from outside of the South (Converse 1966). These Northern transplants tended to live in urban areas near the growing technological industries. Therefore, urban areas were the first areas to shift towards Republicans. In sum, during the 1960s, Northern transplants accounted for almost all change in aggregate partisanship in the South. The shift of northerners to the South was caused by economics (Shafer and Johnston 2006). People fled other areas of the nation looking for a better life in the South. The evidence that partisanship has become more Republican because of immigration from other more Republican parts of the nation has not been found to be the only driver of partisan change. There was also a class-based shift among natives of the South (Nadeau and Stanley 1993). Native whites would not be expected to show changes in partisanship if the results were only from immigration to the South. In fact, data suggest that migrants were more likely in the mid-2000s to vote for Democrats than were native southerners. Studies also show that migrants to North Carolina increasingly identify and register as unaffiliated voters rather than Republicans. This study also shows that unaffiliated voters were more likely to vote for Barack Obama in 2008 than natives of North Carolina (Hood and…

    • 1917 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Polarity Management

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: James C. Collins & Jerry I. Porras. (2002). Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies (Harper Business Essentials).…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    southern culture

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages

    After living in such a different environment for a while, I have begun to wonder why different areas of the same country are drastically different. Looking at different areas of research, I began to notice a trend. The states included in the south have a lot higher percentage of churchgoers. In fact a Gallup poll reported, “Christians -- the largest religious group in the country today -- are heavily concentrated in the South and nearby states, while constituting only a minority of residents of Northeastern states, and of many Middle Atlantic and Western states.” “Americans with no religious identity at all tend to be found most frequently in the…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political Socialization

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I have not been very familiar with politics until I started taking this class. My mother is a democrat and father is a republican. I am a republican as well. I can remember my mom and dad arguing about who to vote for president. My dad has the most political influence on me. My mother and I rarely discuss anything that has to do with politics. As for my friends and other family members, never do we discuss politics.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays