Abortion Results in the Death of an Embryo

Topics: Abortion, Human rights, Pregnancy Pages: 5 (1822 words) Published: October 8, 1999
Abortion is the ending of pregnancy before birth and is morally wrong. An abortion results in the death of an embryo or a foetus. Abortion destroys the lives of helpless, innocent children and illegal in many countries. By aborting these unborn infants, humans are hurting themselves; they are not allowing themselves to meet these new identities and unique personalities. Abortion is very simply wrong. Everyone is raised knowing the difference between right and wrong. Murder is wrong, so why is not abortion? People argue that it is not murder if the child is unborn. Abortion is murder since the foetus being destroyed is living, breathing and moving. Why is it that if an infant is destroyed a month before the birth, there is no problem, but if killed a month after birth, this is inhumane murder? It is morally and strategically foolish, because we lose the middle when we talk about reproductive rights without reference to a larger moral and spiritual dimension, and we are unwilling to use language like transgression and redemption, or right and wrong.-Wolf p54The main purpose abortions are immoral is how they are so viciously done. Everyday, innocent, harmless foetuses that could soon be laughing children are being brutally destroyed. One form of abortion is to cut the foetus into pieces with serrated forceps before being removed, piece by piece from the uterus by suction with a vacuum aspirator. Another form consists of bringing the foetus feet first into the birth canal, puncturing its skull with a sharp instrument and sucking out the brain tissue. The body parts, such as the head, are given letters, rather than refer to the parts as what they are. In my opinion this is for the doctors who cannot face the reality of what they are doing. The remains of the foetus or embryo, as the case may be, are put into everyday, plastic buckets and then sent to a dumpster where these precious bones and limbs are disposed. However, how and when an abortion takes place are matters of little importance to pro- abortionists and other defenders. Even former abortion practitioners from varying backgrounds and religions have a new view on abortion. These changes of heart were caused by psychological, religious and scientific reasons. One doctor, Dr. Bernard Nathanson, performed 60,000 abortions and supervised 10,000, before scientific evidence and the use of an ultrasound, convinced him he was promoting and participating what he now calls "the most atrocious holocaust in the history of the United States." Other doctors refuse to perform legal abortions, saying they should save lives rather than destroy them.Many argue is it the women's or the foetus' rights and values that are being trampled on? "Pro-choice movements sometimes fall back on an abortion rhetoric that seems to dehumanize and trivialize the death of a foetus as a way to humanize and make important the reproductive rights of women." (Wolf p54) "Women can treat an unwanted foetus as a violation of her civil rights and is therefor justified tin using force to expel it" (McMillan pA12) The decision is not up to the mother because she is not God. Only God, the ultimate creator has the right to choose who may live and who shall die. Humans do not have the right or the power to control the quality of life and to avoid suffering. "The issue of abortion is not just life, but how life is created and the extent to which human intention and control the process, both before and after birth. All humans inventions and interventions may give us a world to regret." (Clark p3) With abortion, we humans give ourselves dominion over a large part of God's plans and our destiny. Abortion becomes especially evil when the bond between mother and child is broken and it is being used as an alternative birth control when humans cannot control their irresponsible sexual hungers. If beings are responsible enough to be sexually active, they should also be responsible enough to...

Cited: /b>
  • Alvare, Helen, Wilson, Marle, Wolf, Naomi. "Abortion: Whose Values? Whose Rights?" Tikkun January-February 1997: pp54-60
  • Clark, Thomas. "Thou Shalt Not Play God" The Humanist July-August 1995: p3
  • Hunt, George W.. "Of Many Things" America 31 January 1998: p2
  • Lavelle, Marianne. "When Abortion Comes Late In Pregnancy, Though Rare, Most Aren 't For Medical Reasons" U.S. News and World Reports 19 January 1998: p31-32
  • Lefevere, Patricia. "Ex-abortion Providers; Conversation Tales" National Catholic Reporter 16 January 1998: p6
  • Merril, Ted. "Abortion; Extreme Views Ignore Reality" Medical Economics 15 July 1996: p33
  • McMillan, Jeff. "Focusing On a Woman 's Right To Self Defense" The Chronicle of Higher Education. 6 December 1996: pA12
  • "No Easy Quick Fix Solutions To Abortion Issues" National Catholic Reporter 8 November 1996: p20
  • "Reproductive Tract Infections and Abortion Among Adolescent Girls In Rural Nigeria" The Lancet 4 February 1995: p300
  • Thomas, Judy. "Pro-life Turns Deadly" Newsweek 26 January 1998: p64
  • Wallace, Bruce. "When One Fetus Lives and One Dies" Maclean 's 19 August 1996: pp20-21
    Continue Reading

    Please join StudyMode to read the full document

  • You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

    • Abortion Essay
    • abortion Essay
    • Abortion: How Protect the Embryo? Essay
    • Essay on Death
    • Abortion Essay
    • abortion Essay
    • abortion Essay
    • abortion Essay

    Become a StudyMode Member

    Sign Up - It's Free