Abortion Pro Choice vs Pro Life

The controversy on abortion has become one of the most divisive and irrationally controversial issues of our time, turned into a legal and political power struggle with no permanent resolution in sight. Every argument that the media and the world focuses on is the differences, rather then the common ground. This subject is a very touchy subject to most people, more towards women though. I choose to write about how do we or should we interpret moral absolutes in a pluralist democracy regarding the subject of abortion.
When one thinks about this subject so many questions arise. The many questions that arise consist of what is considered human, is a fetus inside the mothers womb just a clump of tissue, or should it be considered a baby? There are so many questions that both sides use to debate. There are two sides to this debate, pro-choice and pro-life. What makes one believe that abortion is right, and what makes one believe that abortion is wrong. Many pro-life and pro-choice advocates cannot even accurately state the other sides' position; and many people cannot even state their own position in a way they would be comfortable with after even just a few questions that get them to reflect on it.
Before deciding if one is pro-choice or pro-life you would have to define the popular question, when does human life begin? There are three different theories people look from. There is the theological or religious belief faith, philosophic, and biologic theories.
The religious beliefs can be broken down into three statements. The first statement is that people believe that there is god, and every soul created by god is human. The second statement people may believe is that they also believe in god but that a human is not created until birth. The third statement people may believe is that they do not believe in god, or souls. The philosophic theory believes that a human is created when a heart beat is present, or when there is brain function. The biologic theory is one