a. After having studied several other approaches to ethics in addition to Virtue Ethics, what do you think the main arguments against this statement are? A Virtue ethics is an approach to ethics that emphasizes the character of the moral agent, rather than rules or consequences, as the key element of ethical thinking. Not the same as Utilitarianism or Kat i.e. It is not so much a guide for moral decision making, more a description of the moral life. I think the main arguments against this statement are that Utilitarianism and Kat ask about “ How should I act?’, on the other hand, virtue theory asks “How should I live life?” and “What kind of person should I be?” It is interested in the whole person, not just their action.
b. Has your rating of this item changed after reading this chapter? If so, in what way? If your rating has not changed, are your reasons for the rating any different now from when you first responded to this statement? I still agree this statement. Aristotle is concerned with action, not as begin right or good in itself, but as it is conductive to human good. I agree with him. So far we have been studied several theories guided us how to determine what it right and wrong. However, I think the most important thing is to look at the aim behind an action why a person to doing it, and what is the purpose for doing this. As we practice these acts, we come to realize that the virtue is good in and of itself. For example, a child is taught to tell the truth, by her parents, and he does so because they have taught him he should. I believe that everyone has ability to determine what he/she ought to do base on their character trait.
2. Hinman suggests that there are typically some gender differences in our society in regard to virtues such as courage and compassion. Based on your experience, do you think this is true? Are there any other virtues in our society that exhibit gender differences? Are there any vices that are valued...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document