Preview

Aaron Harker

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
338 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Aaron Harker
The Founders provided for change to the Constitution with Article 5
Constitutional amendments may be proposed and ratified, or approved, in two ways:
A two-thirds vote in the house and senate
Two-thirds of the states petition, or appeal to, Congress to call a convention.

In the 1980s and early 1990s, 32 state legislature petitioned Congress for a convention to propose a balanced budget amendment.
Congress has to methods for obtaining state approval when an amendment is proposed:
The legislature in three-fourths of the states can ratify an amendment.
The states hold special conventions and need three-fourths of the conventions to approve it
Congress set a rule that says there is a time limit-seven years- for states to ratify an amendment.

There are two indirect ways to adapt the Constitution for changing times
Changes through law
For example, Article I gives Congress the power to “lay and collect taxes” but does not spell out the practical details.
Passing tax laws is one way Congress has expanded the scope of its power.
Changes through practices
For example, Article II says the Congress may impeach, or accuse, federal officials and remove them from office, but is vague on the types of crimes.
Interpreting Article II is one way Congress can adapt the Constitution.

The Actions of presidents have affected the interpretation of the Constitution.
Modern presidents often conduct foreign affairs by executive agreement—agreements between heads of states—instead of the treaty process specified in the Constitution.

Through judicial review, the Supreme Court plays a key role in interpreting the meaning of words and phrases in the Constitution.
Those who support judicial restraint believe that the Court should avoid taking initiative on social and political issues.
Those who support judicial activism believe that the Court should actively help settle difficult social and political questions.

The Constitution can be changed informally through

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The decisions of justices have "altered behavior of political and governmental officials as well as a man walking down the street"(Miller 4). To understand the role of the Supreme Court in the American system then one must pay attention to the social impact of court decisions. "The supreme court has assumed the task (of)...enforcing a law known to all, of deciding what law ought to be and making any changes called for" (Knight 1). Decisions are made by the Justices from conflicting principles not because of the law, but because of an evaluation of what impact the decision will have on American society.…

    • 1883 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I do believe that judicial activism can be dangerous if the decision is made by a judge based on a belief that can be harmful to a group, such as being prejudice to a specific race, gender, or age, just to be spiteful. I would like to think that wouldn’t happen today and that we have learned from history not to repeat that kind of behavior, yet I still see it today. A good example is the fight for gay marriage and rights for equal treatment for transgenders.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Constitution is often loosely interpreted to meet the issues of the present. In the words of former Justice Charles Evans Hughes, "We are under a Constitution, but the Constitution is what the judges say it is”. (Hughes) Judicial activism and judicial restraint are the philosophy and the reason behind the majority of judicial decisions. Most people are often confused over the true meaning and their proper applications. The theory of judgment that takes into account the spirit of laws and the changing times is referred to as judicial activism, and judicial restraint looks at strict interpretation of the law and the importance of legal precedent. To figure out whether a judge or court is considered to be an activist or restrained, you must look back at the history of judgments made by either the judge or the court.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is one of the few amendments that is not directly applied to the state government. This is an amendment is only applicable to the federal government.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Impeachment- (in congress or a state legislature) the presentation of formal charges against a public official by the lower house, trial before the upper house…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Presidential powers are laid out in article II of the constitution, these include a range of formal power such as the power to propose legislation, submit the annual budget, sign legislation, veto legislation, act as chief executive, nominate federal judges and several others. There are also a range of informal powers that have progressively increased in power such as the ability for Presidents to issue executive orders. Although the founding fathers intended to create a government that had a system of checks and balances to prevent tyranny, the effectiveness of these checks in place may not have been as authoritative as intended as the President has ways of getting around the checks in place.…

    • 963 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consitutional Review

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Politicians do invite judicial intervention deliberately to avoid public criticism of their incapability of action to divert responsibility to the court, to remove the heat of them. Most cases that have to deal with civil rights and abortions are left to the court system as well as topics on immigration.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Constrained Court is a court that cannot create social change because it is constrained by three ideas. The first constraint is limited by the constraint of constitutional rights. The restricted nature of constitutional rights prevents the courts from effectively acting on social reform claims and would prevent change because not all claims can be looked at through a constitutional lens when emotional and mainstream opinion are a factor, and it is important for new rights to be built upon old ones rather than disregarded completely. The second constraint is that the court doesn’t lacks interdependence from the other branches of government to produce social change. The decision of the courts can be overturned by congress and congress can change the legal structure. The third constraint of the court is that the courts do not have the appropriate tools to create social change through the development of policy change. In order for social change to happen within these courts political elites must support the stance if not it will be…

    • 1975 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    28th Amendment

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    propose an amendment by a two-thirds vote (of a quorum, not necessarily of the entire body) of the…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Klein, Philip. "Is it time for a convention? Article V of the Constitution is a not-so- secret weapon for opponents of ObamaCare and other federal outrages." The American Spectator Oct. 2010: 26+. Expanded Academic ASAP. Web. 14 Nov. 2011.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Constitution of the United States explicates the enumerated powers that the people have granted to their public administration. A narrow interpretation of the Constitution would mean denying the government the powers granted to them to keep order, equality, and fairness. An expanded interpretation would "extend words beyond their natural and obvious import, and we might question the application of the term…" (244). It is the government's responsibility to exercise powers that cannot be exercised by its governed people. There are no guidelines in the Constitution's composition that discloses how to interpret the language; therefore, it is in the hands of three federal branches of government to decipher the Constitutions meaning.…

    • 2361 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Texas constitution.

    • 547 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The framers of the Texas Constitution failed to anticipate that the limitations they imposed on governmental institutions would ultimately allow major economic interests within the state to dominate the policy-making process, often to the detriment of the lower socioeconomic groups. What the delegates to the Texas Constitutional Convention of 1875 regarded as the strengths of the constitution--fragmented authority, detailed limitations on the power of governmental institutions, and decentralization--have served to limit the ability of state and local governments to adapt effectively to economic and demographic changes. The perceived solutions to many of the problems of 1875 have compounded the problems of state and local governments in the 2000s.…

    • 547 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Fifth Amendment

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The other way amendments can be proposed is through a constitutional convention. This constitutional convention must be called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. This has never been done before in the history of the United States, although recently there have been increased calls for it. This way of amending the Constitution was added as a state check on the federal government, allowing the states to amend the Constitution without any oversight by the federal government. While it has never been used, it is still important, as it makes the amendment process more democratic and responsive to the…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those who claim the Supreme Court is too politically active object to judicial activism; however there are two different types of judicial activism, there is liberal and conservative activism, they both have a different style of how the supreme court should be run, so liberal activism being actively interpreting the constitution, whereas conservative activism is the upholding of vested interests.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Another “weakness” of the Articles that I feel could be strength is that the federal government could…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays