Preview

ACC 291: Comparing IFRS To GAAP

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
710 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
ACC 291: Comparing IFRS To GAAP
Comparing IFRS to GAAP
Brandi A. Collins
ACC/291
April 27, 2015
Comparing IFRS to GAAP Essay

Both the FASB and the IASB together moving to the fair value capacity for the financial instruments. FASB and ISAB both want to move towards a fair value capacity. Both the FASB and IASB believe in the fair value capacity to produce a more precise explanation for the company’s financial records. There’s a difference in opinions between the two agreeing and disagreeing on the aspects like as, the banks doubting the system will make it easy to guesstimate accurately since the fair value is done by estimation. To answer their differences they have decided to meet on mutual grounds by concealing the fair value information of the financial reports
…show more content…
Any company that decides to use the revision framework must follow the procedures if the revision, when the company does choose to use the revision it must be useful to all these assets within the same class. If the assets are suffering a rapid price change they must then be upped at an annual rate. Product development imbursements can be logged as development expenses while others are logged as development costs. The difference between development cost and development expenses is that a cost is used when an expense is made for imports to develop assets and assets for imports such as land purchased will remain an asset to the company as long as they own it. A cost would be something the company purchases that will devalue such as a vehicle for the company that will continue to devalue as time passes. The IFRS will outline contingent liability as a possible requirement that is not recognized by the financial reports, they may however be exposed if a certain criteria is met. A liable liability could be something from the company’s past such as a law suit depending on the ending of the lawsuit. The company will have liability or no liability at all. For the IFRS, they use necessities which are also defined as a liability that is of tentative timing and amount, these can be employee vacation pay, warranty’s and any anticipated loss …show more content…
GAAP for example, will list their liabilities and assets in the priority of their liquidity. Not all company’s follow GAAP and will list their liabilities prior to their assets and may show their long term liabilities previous to their current liabilities. IFRS will require the effective-interest process when they are remunerating the bond discounts and premiums, while GAAP will allow the use of the straight- line method, and IFRS will not distinguish the bond at a premium or discount they must be known at by the net amount of the bond. In respects to the ideal stock the IFRS and GAAP both will require the preferred stock to be redeemed at a specific time in the future as well as be reported as a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Comparing IFRS to GAAP

    • 798 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The reevaluation of a businesses assets is defined as the way in which change values from book to fair value. If there is every any considerable economic changes in the market the process is required to compensate for that. If a company bought a building 5 years ago and due to market value there was a real estate boom, the property can be reevaluated to fair market value. Under IFRS, when an asset is reevaluated all assets in that class must be treated with the same valuation method. This process keeps evaluations consistent in the company (Work Plan,…

    • 798 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ACC 290 IFRS v. GAAP

    • 1158 Words
    • 4 Pages

    GAAP and IFRS both have similar expectations from companies with regards to the information presented on the statement of financial position. GAAP has a strict requirement that all accounts be listed in order of liquidity with the highest measure of liquidity first. The IFRS does not require a specific order or classification of the accounts. With IFRS the general rule of thumb is that accounts be listed starting with the least liquid accounts listed first. GAAP following companies will have their balance sheets follow the order of current assets, long term assets, current liabilities, long term liabilities, ending with stockholder equity. Generally IFRS standards suggest their statement of financial position in the order of long-term assets, current assets, shareholder equity, long-term liabilities, and lastly current liabilities.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    IFRS TO GAAP

    • 814 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The component depreciation is when an asset fundamentally has different parts that will be depreciated with the different treatment. When under the IFRS, companies are required to use component depreciation only if the parts of the asset offer vary patterns of benefit. So the main reason behind that is it provides a clearing picture of the asset’s value. This would be also permitted under the GAAP, from what I have read U.S. companies barely use it in practice.…

    • 814 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper seeks to analyze the GAAP and the IFRS, their mandate and functions. Further, it shall compare the differences and similarities of the two standards which have such great implications to the functions of accountants, attorneys, corporate directors and financial officers.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    IFRS vs ASPE

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    financial assets refer to any asset that is “cash, an equity instrument of another entity, a contractual right, a contract that will or may be settled in the entity's own equity instruments”. The main differences between IFRS and ASPE exist for scope, classification, and measurement of financial assets. IFRS uses four categories of financial assets: fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL), held-to-maturity (HTM), loans and receivable, and available for sale. ASPE does not use the four categories to group the financial assets. Instead, investments are categorized by their nature: equity, debt, and derivatives. For the joint arrangements perspective, IFRS distinguishes joint operations from joint ventures and require proportionate consolidation for joint operations and the equity method for joint ventures. ASPE, on the other hand, does not distinguish between joint operations from joint ventures and uses the term joint venture to refer to both types of joint arrangements. ASPE allows the proportionate consolidaton, the equity method, and the cost method without any preference for…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Gaap vs Ifrs Pension Acctg

    • 2665 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Is the Difference in Accounting Treatment of Post-Retirement Benefits under IFRS Beneficial or Detrimental to the Financial Position of a Company Currently Reporting Under US GAAP?…

    • 2665 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the United States, companies use an accounting method referred to as Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). While the U.S. has structured GAAP to align all reporting for U.S. businesses, it is different from most other countries accounting standards. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) is an accounting standard used in over 110 countries around the world (GAAP vs. IFRS, n.d.). With the Securities and Exchange Commission looking to move the U.S. accounting to the IFRS standards, understanding the differences is crucial. What follows is an overview of the differences between the two accounting standards, GAAP and IFRS.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ifrs vs Gaap

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages

    be made. Many aspects of the GAAP and IFRS are very different. It is the intent of this paper to analyze differences between the two methods in revenue recognition, earnings per share, inventory, and intangible assets.…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    U.S. GAAP vs IFRS

    • 3430 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Taub, Scott (2007). IFRS and GAAP: The Good and the Bad. Compliance Week, 25 September. Retrieved from http://www.complianceweek.com/article/3642/ifrs-and-gaap-the-good-and-the-bad,html. [Last Accessed 17 November 2008.]…

    • 3430 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gaap vs Ifrs

    • 6672 Words
    • 27 Pages

    The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast some of important differences between US GAAP and IFRS and, though this analysis, give a better understanding how these standards apply in the real world accounting field. This paper analyzes similarities and differences in revenue recognition, asset impairment, consolidation processes, contingencies, and depreciation. In revenue recognition, the definition and treatment of revenue recognition according to US GAAP and IFRS is different. GAAP recognizes revenue when all of the following criterions are made: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. IFRS, on the other hand, has more general requirements and less specified guidance. In asset impairment, the primary difference between GAAP and IFRS is that US GAAP requires a two-step process while IFRS only requires a one step process to…

    • 6672 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Week 5 paper

    • 985 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Fair value measurement provides users of financial statements with an accurate picture of the value of a company’s assets. Both IFRS and GAAP require firms to include information regarding fair value measurement practices in the notes of financial statement. Under either system, the team talked about how companies will be needed to report assets at either book value or fair value, depending on the situation. As a general rule of thumb, all assets in the same class must receive the valuation treatment. In regards to the value receivables, IFRS uses a two-tiered method that first analyzes individual receivables and then looks at receivables as a whole to determine if there is any impairment.…

    • 985 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The relationship between the Governmental Accounting Standards Board and the Financial Accounting Standards Board is a tricky one. There has been a long-standing power struggle between the two entities because they are both able to establish generally accepted accounting principals, and they both posses the authority to do so. Because of this problems arise when they provide different answers to the same question. The ideal solution would be to integrate both bodies into a single organization. Unfortunately, with politicians, organizations and institutions who want to stay in control, the only alternative may be to have the Financial Accounting Foundation (FAF) exhort its influence over the FASB and GASB to coordinate their operations…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    For those in the business world, particularly in the accounting field, a major issue has surfaced in recent years relating to the differences between Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Currently, the majority of countries in the world follow International Financial Reporting Standards guidelines; however, the United States still uses GAAP. This topic has been a main focus because there is a plan for convergence between the two frameworks in the near future. The United States accounting system will undergo drastic changes when this occurs, but in the long-run the idea is to simplify the accounting procedures around the world. “Through these projects, some covering major components of the financial statements, the boards intend to improve financial reporting information for investors while also aligning US and international accounting standards. These projects are a significant move toward achieving a common accounting framework, a necessary step in the globalization of business and investment” (PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP, 2011). The main difference between GAAP and IFRS is that GAAP is considerably rule-based, whereas IFRS is more principal-based which means IFRS has room for interpretation. The specific differences are far too many to cover in a short presentation, however, an explanation of some major differences are mentioned below.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). (2010). Accounting standards codification TM. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). Retrieved from http://aaahq.org/ascLogin.cfm…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1973, the private sector International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) was formed. The IASB is a natural extension of a global market that has been evolving over the last three decades. The IASB formulates and publishes accounting standards to be observed when presenting financial statements and promote their global acceptance. As an overarching mission, the IASB works to improve and harmonize accounting standards, regulations, and procedures as it relates to financial statements. IASB standards provide a reference model and set of examples for financial reporting in developing countries. The IASB has no authority with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) or the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the United States at this time. Even though the FASB and SEC are not members of the ISAB, the SEC has ruled formally that public companies that have adopted the IASB standards can list their securities on the United States stock exchanges (Schroeder, Clark, & Cathey, Chapter 1, 2011).…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays