A Rhetorical Analysis Of Non-Verbal Communication

When I watched my presentation, I saw how I started with a strong introduction with a rhetorical question. I by saying “Who would you call? What would you do? How would you handle the situation? All these questions may be hard for you to answer in your crisis. I got the answer to clean up the mess you got yourself into.” Also, I give the audience a vision by saying “Let’s say your life is being broadcast all over the media or maybe even your company. We all know One of your biggest fears would be getting caught in a scandal or having a bad rep.” You got all part of my introduction to the greeting, thesis, credibility, and overview. I also, had the personality to my speech when talking you could see how enthusiastic I was to the audience. This made my speech be interesting and not dull and my voice a great projectile for everyone in the class to hear. In my speech, I had great eye contact so I had the attention, keen interest, and understanding for my classmates. None verbal communication is “Behaviors, symbols, attributes, or objects—whether intended or not—that communicate messages with social meaning.” In my body of my speech, I provided information in chronically order as my overview. I give great information about the education requirements, job outlook, and Pros and
My pacing started to speed up as I started to finish my speech. I feel like I had a lot of filler words like And, then, etc. I could have been more specific on my examples on my intro for the scandal parts. An example is A “simple, representative incident or model that clarifies a point”. I also, I think my summary or conclusion should have been longer and in more detailed. ‘Summary and synthesis of the speech-leave the listeners with something to remember.” I felt as if I could have left my audience with more to remember when I concluded. But, overall my speech was good and only had a few criticism I think I needed to work