A Rhetorical Analysis Of Coed Combat Units

Throughout the United States, sexism is a defining role in the choices that are made concerning who can and cannot perform a certain task the most efficient and safe. Fighting on the front line, in a Combat Unit, is one of those tasks that certainly takes special skills and integrity that not many people possess. Throughout reading and analyzing Coed Combat Units—A Bad Idea on All Counts, many informative, thought-provoking, and straight forward points were addressed concerning women working along-side of men on the front line in the United States Military. While growing up and still to this day, I have always believed that men should be the only ones fighting for our great country, no because a woman cannot keep up, but because men were basically built to fight in the military.
One of the three points
The main connecting point of unit cohesion is what Greeks call philia. Philia is translated and defined as friendship, comradeship, or brotherly love. In the essay, it goes into an example about philia how numberless soldiers have died, not for country, honor, or religious faith or for any other reason but because they realized that by them fleeing the post they were as and rescuing themselves, they would in-turn expose their companions to greater danger. On contrasting sides, the Greeks also identified another type of love called eros. Eros will manifest itself as sexual competition. When a woman is in close confines of a combat unit, that unleashes eros, the sexual kind of love. This type of love can hinder the success of the goal of the military. When sexual intercourse occurs, the chances of women becoming pregnant dramatically increase, thus making the woman unable to perform her job and taking her out off of the field. You can call love, love, but do not confuse brotherly love or comradeship with