Preview

A First Amendment Junkkie Susan Jacoby Summary

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
424 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A First Amendment Junkkie Susan Jacoby Summary
Ariel Okech
Diana D’India
ENGL 101 055
31 October 2014

In "A First Amendment Junkie" Susan Jacoby argues that censoring pornography goes against the First Amendment. She believes that the First Amendment should be absolutely interpreted. She states that people will never be able to agree on what should be censored. She points out that censoring pornography will lead to censorship of other topics that need to be discussed and brought to attention in American society. She believes that pornography cannot even be defined as to what is “obscene” or what “art is”, and for that reason it can’t be censored
I believe that Susan Jacoby is right. Pornography should be available for those who want to make it or view it. While it may be offensive

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    He looks at restrictions on sexually explicit literature as violating the first amendment and the Modern First Amendment theories, and citing examples of Warren and William Brennan, and states that the obscenity law is ignored or the state…

    • 2333 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This is viewed as too broad and vague by the Free Speech Coalition. Under Miller v. California pornography can only be banned if it is considered obscene and without redeeming social value or rather if it would offend the average person. The problem with the CPPA was that even film and art, for example ideas produced centuries ago would be considered a violation. According to the First Amendment there is a difference between actions and words; although, certain categories of speech are protected especially those concerning children, those protected categories were not included in the CPPA. The speech used in the CPPA was not remarkable enough to persuade others to break the law; therefore, it cannot be banned. Because the language used was much too vague it was ruled that the prohibitions of the CPPA were overboard and…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first amendment guarantees the right of free expression to all citizens of the United States. Leonard Pitt’s writing “Who decides if it’s art or porn?” brings up a major issue with the first amendment of free expression. Pitts states his thesis towards the end of his article with the two questions, “What is the line where obscenity ends and art begins? And who gets to say?” I’m not entirely sure about the answer to the first question, but I do know that the government and the judges of the court have the power to decide what the difference is.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Censorship in libraries, and in book stores is still apparent as it was one hundred years ago. Today’s society still knows that not all literary materials are considered appropriate to everyone, and therefore still places those inappropriate items in places not as well publicized. Even today, when I walked into a book store, the magazines and books on pornography are placed on high shelves, above the view of the public eye. They are there if I wish to look at them, but they are still somewhat “reserved.” I do not have to look up that high if I choose not to.…

    • 337 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think that they’re should be only certain banned books.”The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks...Considered to be pornigraphic…”This quote means that a parent decided that a book should be banned for nothing.What i mean is that he/she decided that because she thought it looked inappropriate that it should be banned. Also I Think that the government shouldn't get involved with this topic. What i mean is that they shouldn’t decide on what we read because it looks bad or graphic. For example The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks was banned for being pornigraphic.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    week2assignment

    • 1559 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Question 7. 7. Which statement might be used to argue that pornography should be more tightly regulated? (Points : 1)…

    • 1559 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Censorship Critique

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In her essay, “Censorship: A Personal View” Judy Blume gives readers insight on the impact of censorship based on her personal experiences as a young reader and then later in life as a censored writer. She provides numerous examples of educators who were affected by censorship and chose to take a stand against it (345). Although the piece lacks evidentiary support for these accounts, and draws on sarcasm for emphasis, the original objective remains clear and strong. Blume succeeds in exposing what censorship is capable of, what this means for readers and writers, and how activist groups like the National Coalition Against Censorship [NCAC] can help.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Whilst many view pornography is offensive, viewing pornography itself does not adhere to acceptable standards of moral behaviour. It is arguable that one does not have to agree with the action being defended in order to uphold the principle it relies on such as supporting the use of pornography in order to defend it as a right of privacy or free speech. It seems hypocritical that MacKinnon is claiming that such liberty-limiting principles should be imposed. One can argue that MacKinnon is using her right to freedom of speech to make such radical proposals against men and speak out for women everywhere but if these rights were taken away from her, she would be powerless. MacKinnon is likely to reject the views of Mill and others who share his views because advocating such a position as the liberty of the individual will result in males being further protected, while also further dominating…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rebuttal Research Paper

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Censorship according to the Encyclopedia Britannica is "The Act of changing or suppressing speech or writing that is considered subversive of the common good." Censorship, therefore, undermines and is contrary to the First Amendment, which is intended to allow freedom of speech.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    English

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages

    believes in the first amendment . Jacoby’s claim is that all restrictions on pornography are not…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Censorship has affected America throughout its years, but modern America seems to be the most affected by censorship. Censorship occurs when we watch television or a movie, listen to the radio or buy music, or even read a book or magazine. There are regulations for what the public can and can’t see or hear. So who decides what the public can and can’t see? Who ultimately decides what is obscene and what should therefore be suppressed? Aren’t we a society capable of making that decision for ourselves? Apparently not, and perhaps for good reason too, because what is not obscene to one person may be objectionable to another. "Not everyone born free and equal, as the Constitution says, but everyone made equal. Each…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The word censorship communicates a negative overtone. Basically, it refers to restrictions placed on an individual’s or group’s right to publicly communicate something in a variety of formats. In America, there are instances in which individuals and groups are censored for the wrong reasons. For instance, a person of faith should not be censored from praying in public. There are too many instances of this occurring which indicates the fascination with being politically correct has reached a point of absurdity. Yet, there are things in American culture that should be restricted. For example, pornography should not be freely disseminated among children. Pornography should be censored. As a Christian, I see no place for pornography at all but…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Censorship

    • 317 Words
    • 1 Page

    Susan Jacoby states in her text “A First Amendment Junkie”, that she believes in the “absolute interpretation of the First Amendment” (48). She argues that although she is a feminist, she firmly believes that the First Amendment should be absolutely interpreted and does not believe in any type of censoring in pornography. She claims that states and people will never coincide on what should be censored, because pornography cannot de defined. She adds that there is no clear line what defines art and what exactly is obscene, therefore it cannot be censored. Susan Brownmiller on the other hand, states in “Let’s Put Pornography Back in the Closet” that the First Amendment is often abused, especially when it comes to pornography. She believes that it “dehumanizes the female body for the purpose of erotic stimulation and pleasure” (62). Brownmiller thinks that because the Court added new guidelines to the Miller case of 1973, it would have given more power to the states to enforce the obscenity laws, but the three-part test only made it more difficult to define “obscene”. She establishes that the First Amendment was never meant to “protect obscenity”, but to make a “distinction between permission to publish and permission to display publicly”(63).…

    • 317 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are several reasons to not illegalise pornography. Firstly, illegalising pornography would harm to economies of many pornography companies and industries. At every second, $3,027.64 is spent on pornography. Do the math, and you will find that everyday, $265,735,296 is spent on pornography. In fact, the revenue of the pornography industry is larger than those of the top technology companies combined: Microsoft, Google, Amazon, eBay, Yahoo!, Apple, Netflix and Earth Link. Imagine, if watching pornography was made illegal, these pornography companies would lose business, and the money spent on pornography would rapidly decrease. They would collapse, and thousands, even hundreds of thousands of people working for these companies would be out of jobs, and countries would lose a valuable source of income. Making pornography illegal would have a severe economic impact which can have catastrophic consequences. The best thing to do, in this case, is simply nothing.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In conclusion, the pornography is not really the problem. The problem is a society that purchases the pornography. We live in a society with people who ban porn in the outside world, make fun of people who openly use it and then, within the secrecy of their homes, log onto www.sex.com. I don't agree with pornography, but I know that it won't go away easily. Even if it is against the law in the country, it will still survive -- maybe even better than it does now. The only way to stop pornography is through the mindset of the people who use it, but until then America will continue to click away.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays