Preview

A Failure In Generalship Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
613 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Failure In Generalship Analysis
“A Failure in Persuasion”

In “A Failure in Generalship”, LTC Paul Yingling assigns blame for the failure of the military in the Vietnam War and the dire and deteriorating situation in Iraq at the beginning of 2007, placing it on America’s generals, then and now. Though fearless in its attempt, the essay presents a weak academic argument to back up this claim due to a string of fallacies, statements and arguments based on false or invalid inference. Most notable in his essay is “hasty generalization”, “missing the point”, and the “false dichotomy”. The initial fallacy that undermines the argument is that of “hasty generalization”. A “hasty generalization” is a broad sweeping statement placed on a group of people without a sufficient

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The Vietnam War lasted about two decades. The United States was engulfed in a civil war between North and South Vietnam and wanted to assist the south with preventing a hostile takeover by North Vietnam under the Communism banner. The Vietnam War was not only America’s longest War, but also costliest and deadliest. We spent over $150 billion and suffered close to $58 thousand American deaths and nearly 300 thousand wounded. By the time we decided to withdraw from the war, North Vietnam easily swept through the south and unified Vietnam under Communism. Still to this day, one of the most debated topics regarding the Vietnam War is why the United States got involved and why, when and how we should wage future wars. (Dunn, 2001)…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Building a movement always challenges the status quo. Leaders must act, they must willingly risk the things they love and unfortunately, many leaders are frozen by the lethargy of indecision i. Union General George B. McClellan, who was meticulous in his planning and preparations, was also known for not aggressively challenging his opponents on a fast-moving battlefield environment. He chronically overestimated the strength of the enemy and was reluctant to apply principles of mass, frequently leaving large portions of his army unengaged at decisive points ii. At no time was this more evident during the only battle of the Civil War in which McClellan led his troops from start to finish. His performance during the bloody Battle of Antietam blunted General Robert E. Lee’s invasion of Maryland, but also allowed him to eke out a precarious tactical draw and avoid destruction despite being grossly outnumbered on the battlefield iii. His missteps challenged the principles of building cohesive teams thru mutual trust, creating shared understanding, and above all, accepting prudent risks.…

    • 4616 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As one of the most famous battles of Vietnam, the battle of Dong Ap Bia provides a useful case study for the concept of mission command. Infamously known as Hamburger Hill, the high casualties and subsequent abandonment of the mountain caused critics to question the decision of military leaders. As with many battles in Vietnam, the commander, LTC Honeycutt, contended with the enemy while attempting to exert control with incomplete information in jungle-covered mountains. Although he was generally successful in fulfilling the six imperatives of mission command, it does not prove decisive to the U.S. Army’s ultimate victory. LTC Honeycutt’s approach to mission command is both lean and blunt, focused on success in combat.…

    • 1815 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    More specifically the areas of Command and Control (C2), Intelligence, Fires, and Sustainment at the Joint Task Force level bear the burden of failing to plan and prepare the battlefield in a manner that would have…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the beginning of the book private Archie Lemon thinks about the war that suppose to “end injustice,” and that he doesn't mind getting killed, because the people coming after him will live in “happiness and peace” (23). Such a false propaganda is recognized by soldiers fifty pages later. They realize that the war “was brought about moneyed interests for its own selfish ends,” because idealism and patriotism have nothing to do with the war. They call it brutal and degrading, and, “fools who fight, are pawns shoved about to serve the interest of others” (96). March in the 30s recognizes of what the war becomes in the twenty first century; a character name Sergeant Theodore Donohoe back then sees the war as a business (because today it is fought for the territory or land resources); he states that in order to get anywhere in it, one has to adjust oneself to its peculiarities and “play the cards the way they fall” (30). Unfortunately, not a lot of soldiers have learned or will ever learn how to play this game…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two authors of this book were Allan R. Millett and Peter Maslowski. Maslowski, the author of chapters one through nine, is a professor of U.S. Military History and U.S. History at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. He earned his Ph. D at Ohio State University and has served on the Army Historical Advisory Committee, the Executive Board of War In History, and the Board of Trustees of the Society for Military History. He holds three prestigious awards for outstanding teaching. Millett , the author of chapters ten through eighteen, is a Professor of Military History at Ohio State University. He also earned his Ph. D at Ohio State. A U.S. Marine Corps officer,…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before this course, my conception of the roles military officers in society and government had was that they were distinct individuals of a higher moral and ethical caliber. With these values came a voluntary but clear support of their chain of command and mission to defend the citizens of the United States of America. Prior to attending West Point, I observed an awkward separation between members of the armed forced and civilians due to lack of knowledge and familiarity of both worlds. Therefore, while I was aware that…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When looking at something as complicated as two Generals leadership qualities and tactics it is important to look at the context in which the battles and the wider war. For example, it is important to realise just how revolutionary the American Civil War was compared to the last conflict that the commanders of the Union and Confederate Armies were leading their men in. The Mexican-American War (1846-48) was the last time the American Armies had been in conflict. Despite being only…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On June 6, 1944, our future President Dwight D. Eisenhower who was a general at the time and Supreme Commander of the Allied Expeditionary Force in Europe, gave permission for Operation Overlord. This operation was a massive invasion in Europe during the German Nazi era. Eisenhower’s motivational speech was full of positivity and confidence for the troops. Using phrases such as, “The eyes of the world are upon you,” and “We will accept nothing less than full victory,” shows how the usage in Eisenhower’s words are meant to pressure the soldiers. He therefore wants his men to know that not only does he have expectations for them, but America as well. Eisenhower appeals to the emotions of his audience by targeting the values and purpose of serving…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    hius-308 final essay

    • 1559 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “From a strategic standpoint, the American way of war seeks swift military victory, independent of strategic policy success; the desired political and military outcomes do not always align. When analyzed, this…

    • 1559 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Andrew Cockburn writes about how generals or different designation holders pretend to be at front line and hold various decisions with themselves rather than letting the ones who fight for us make the decisions. Firstly, Cockburn argues overall about the different incidents happened so far by holding the decisions and taking longer time to decide by the generals. Likewise, he discusses about the consequences of holding the decisions for a longer time by trying to watch through virtually, and how far can it be damaging for us. Supporting his arguments, Cockburn wisely asserts viable opinions and facts about how the commanders feel while they are battling. The most supporting document or the important document Cockburn includes in this article…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tom Nichols is a professor at U.S Naval War college who is known for writing many books dealing with modern issues relating to different types of conflicts. One of his best books is The Death of Expertise. This essay will discuss the main points of The Death of Expertise, what Nichols is trying to argue in his book, and a final evaluation. The argument that this book explores is the relationship between experts and citizens, how this relationship is collapsing, and what can be done to solve this problem. Nichols explains how American citizens try to find loopholes in an expert’s advice so that they can disregard them. He also discusses about other phenomena, such as the Dunning-Krueger effect and confirmation bias. Nichols also argues that…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As time passes, every society endures situations which stress its' very fabric. Each societies' history is sprinkled with these situations. One such situations which the United States underwent was the Vietnam war. For years this particular event has been hotly debated. Hardly anyone who was present at the time agrees on any point concerning this war, except that they regret it. It has become "the greatest American foreign policy calamity of the century." . Now the United States finds itself entangled in another war. A war in Iraq which is beginning to resemble more and more the events of the Vietnam war. Many analysts, and even the public have begun to wonder if the current situation is the same as what took place in Vietnam. The answer is a disturbing yes. The current military engagement in Iraq is showing signs that it will become for this generation what Vietnam was to that generation.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Military theory spans centuries of conflict all across the world. As such, military theorists have written in a variety of military climates, varying from the absence of gun powder to the presence of nuclear weapons. However, some military theories are transcendent. Some elements of Sun Tzu and Clausewitz are eternally wise. While their similarities may become universal truths, their differences are equally worthy of study because, it is in the differences where choices are made. Sun Tzu and Clausewitz agreed that war is chaos, military action is a tool for diplomatic goals and, as such, the results of warfare are not final. Their differences lie in how they advocate for waging war. The style and preparations for war contrast. This is where…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The decision to go to war has nothing to do with the individuals fighting the war. The warfighters are merely following the orders of the politicians and heads of state who have decided to enter into a war. Walzer claims, “We draw a line between the war itself, for which soldiers are not responsible, and the conduct of the war, for which they are responsible, at least within their own sphere of activity” (39). Soldiers are only responsible for what they directly take part in, so as long as both sides, whether fighting a just or unjust war, follow Jus in Bello principals all soldiers should have the same moral equality. However, Jeff McMahan presents a refutation to this belief in his piece, “Rethinking the ‘Just War’ Part 1”, in which he poses the idea that soldiers are directly responsibility for justice/ injustice of a war. McMahan adheres to a school of thought known as the revisionist approach which believes, “ … that it is the individual…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics