Preview

A Comparison Of Prime Minister Otto Von Bismarck And Benso Di Cavur

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
265 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Comparison Of Prime Minister Otto Von Bismarck And Benso Di Cavur
Prime Minister Otto Von Bismarck and Prime Minister Count Camillo Benso di Cavour were powerful men who believed in politics based on practical objectives rather than on ideals, also referred to as Realpolitik. Bismarck sought to unify Germany while Cavour sought to unify Italy. Looking at which one was more effective as a leader it is my opinion that Otto Von Bismarck was most effective in the success of his nation.
Bismarck was a high-ranking diplomat of the Prussian government, it was said that he was a master of practical politics. Bismarck has been described as being extraordinarily flexible and pragmatic, he kept his options open and was determined and cunning toward reaching his goal. Bismarck was successful in bringing Schleswig-Holstein,
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    HIST 531
    • 4076 Words
    • 14 Pages

    HIST 531

    Leo von Caprivi- Was an German General who succeded Bismarck as Chancelor. He sepperated the office of Prussian Minister President and chancellor of the Reich which Bismarck previously held simultaneously. Under Caprivi’s system secretaries of state were given greater freedom and were allowed audiences with the Kaiser. Further Caprivi introduced the “New Course” which changed foreign and domestic policy towards conciliation with social democrats and a pro-british policy away from the Bismark policy. Caprivi was an ex‐military man who, as a result of this, Wilhelm II was quick to trust. He instigated his own ‘New Course’ – which aimed to ‘kill Socialism with kindness’. He wanted to allow some of the Socialists wanted, including re‐introducing Free Trade and extending the social welfare reforms put in place by Bismarck.…

    • 4076 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Did Bismarck Rule Without The Consent Of Government
    • 60 Words
    • 1 Page

    How Did Bismarck Rule Without The Consent Of Government

    He had the King's approval, Bismarck would rule without the consent of parliament and without legal budget, it was a direct violation of the constitution. He'd twisted his speeches and told lies to achieve his goals. He could look like a modest spokesman or a devious and crafty politician who abused his power. He stirred up conflicts to start…

    • 60 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Otto Von Bismarck's Government: Was It A New Conservatism?
    • 68 Words
    • 1 Page

    Otto Von Bismarck's Government: Was It A New Conservatism?

    Otto von Bismarck’s government policies represented a new kind of conservatism where Bismarck valued traditional ways but also advocated for idealistic reforms aligned with socialism. However, he was still criticized by both conservatives and socialists, arguing that Bismarck was too much of a socialist but still not liberal…

    • 68 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Struggle for Control Fo North America Frq
    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Struggle for Control Fo North America Frq

    Political structure at that time led to Bismarck's success in war. With the untimely death of the Danish King, Christian…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Otto Van Bismarck Research Paper
    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Otto Van Bismarck Research Paper

    Otto Van Bismarck began his reign when he was appointed as the prime minister of Prussia in 1862 by King William I. At this point in time, Prussia was in a mediocre state of power, considerably inferior in comparison to its other surrounding nations. As Bismarck steps into his role as ruler, he had distinctive and clear goals for the rise of power of Prussia over the unification of Germany. His reign consisted of strategies that were effective in the manipulation of domestic and international politics and political parties (Merriman 663). Most significantly, his ability to satisfy both parties of nationalism and liberalism become a key factor in his successful ruling. Specifically, the unexpected victory of the Austro-Prussian war landed Bismarck…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    heyo potao
    • 1486 Words
    • 8 Pages

    heyo potao

    Compare and contrast the foreign policy goals and achievements of Metternich (1815-1848) and Bismarck (1862-1890).…

    • 1486 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Comparing Winston Churchill's 'Blood Toil, Tears, And Sweat'
    • 2599 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Comparing Winston Churchill's 'Blood Toil, Tears, And Sweat'

    Winston Churchill’s leadership and influence saved Britain and Europe from falling under the wrath of Hitler. There are multiple perspectives of an effective leader. One might argue that a leader may force their citizens to swear loyalty to show that immediate results are effective. Others may say that an effective leader is someone who leads the country for the greater good. Some may even say striking fear into citizens is what distinguishes an effective leader from the rest. However, a true leader is able to establish direct communication with their followers. What distinguishes a successful leader from a futile leader is the capability to provide reassurance…

    • 2599 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Germany: Otto Von Bismark
    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Germany: Otto Von Bismark

    Otto von Bismarck was one of the three most important political figures in Germany, besides Martin Luther and Adolph Hitler. Prior to World War I, Bismark contributed to and maintained Germany as an international power. In order to maintain Germany as an international power, Bismark’s overall first concern was to keep France isolated to prevent any retribution from France. He prevented any military alliance with France. His second concern was that Austria-Hungary and Russia posed a threat to peace. Bismarck’s solution was to keep Russia and Ausrtia-Hungary close to him to try and prevent any conflict. Russia thought the Ottoman Empire were the “sick man of Europe,” and was negative towards the empire. This worried Bismarck, because he wanted to maintain peace between two enemies, Russia and the Ottoman Empire. Bismarck’s efforts at the Conference of Berlin (1878), angered Russian nationalists which made Bismarck enter a military alliance with Austria against Russia. This alliance ultimately lasted until the end of World War I. Since Italy was on bad terms with France, they were motivated to join Germany. This created the Triple Alliance. Bismarck remained fearful about tensions…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Otto Von Bismarck Research Paper
    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Otto Von Bismarck Research Paper

    With, Otto von Bismarck, Germany grew from a fragile union of states to a dominant empire. For the 19th century, Bismarck's policies limited the destinies of most of the countries of Europe. Otto Eduard Leopold von Bismarck-Schonhausen was born on April 1, 1815, at Schonhausen. Otto decided to learn law at universities in Berlin, and then entered the Prussian civil service. He then left the service and went back to his family but then entered politics in 1847. At the time the German states were not well organized and could never form tight bonds. Bismarck was determined to free the states from Austrian domination and to unite them under Prussian rule. Otto served as a delegate at the congregation of the German union and as representative to Russia and France. In 1862 he was appointed minister-president of Prussia.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism Dbq
    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nationalism Dbq

    Nationalism was a key factor in building nations. Throughout the years Italians were growing impatient and dissatisfied under foreign rule. Count Cavour was responsible for the brains behind the unification of Italy. He believed that releasing the Italians from foreign rule would not only leave the country authoritative and superb but also supply the people with intelligence and knowledge (Doc. 3). Italian Nationalists looked up to the Kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia because of their power over the Italian states. In 1848, the kingdom had adopted a liberal constitution. So to the middle class liberals, unification under Piedmont Sardinia was appealing. Giuseppe Garibaldi, the leader of army of nationalists, captured Sicily. After marching across the Italian mainland their was an agreement to let the Sardinian king rule. Like Italy, Germany achieved national unity around the same time. The Austrian Empire took over the German confederation; however, Prussia was prepared to unify them. Prussia had a mainly German empire. Therefore, nationalism truly unified Prussia. When Bismarck took control, he was a master of realpolitik. Bismarck’s method for uniting Germany was through blood and iron (Doc 5). He believed that the power of Germany should be allocated over all German People. In his eyes, war was the only option to achieving success.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Bismarck Dbq
    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bismarck Dbq

    As governments experienced many revolutions and uprisings in the name of nationalism, some countries’ respective leaders realized that their traditional conservatism would eventually destabilize their authoritative legitimacy. Thus, leaders such as Otto von Bismarck adopted a new kind of conservatism, mixing both liberal, semi-socialistic and conservative policies in order to keep a balance that would ensure some stability in his state. For Otto von Bismarck, his international policies were more conservative; he promoted nationalism, unification, and state sovereignty. His domestic policies, however, were more liberal; he allowed for progressive social reforms and implemented separation of church and state.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Who Is A Founding Father?
    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Who Is A Founding Father?

    Bismarck almost single-handedly unified Germany and brought it to one of its most prosperous points in history. Some may say Bismarck was a diamond in the rough. After all, he came from a very unusual background but that did not stop him from achieving greatness even in his younger years. Otto von Bismarck was born the first of april in 1815 in the german…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck And German Unification Essay
    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bismarck And German Unification Essay

    The unification of both Germany and Italy brought great change in these countries. This process resulted in these countries to focus on for their independence, economic growth, and a strong nationalism. Also, there is another role of the unification and it is an occurrence of war, separation and controlling politics. War is a natural force which leads to unite some nations as wells as divide others. In the unification process, it is essential to have a confident and courageous leader. Bismarck was a leader in Germany while Cavour was a leader in Italy. Bismarck’s ideas were based on the pure survival. He insisted to work hard in a forceful way thought it might be brutal, to unify the Germany and therefore he was recognized as “Bloddy Iron”. The leadership of Italy was primarily based on the political issues.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Otto Von Bismarck's Unify The New Type Of Conservatism?
    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Did Otto Von Bismarck's Unify The New Type Of Conservatism?

    In the nineteenth century, Germany was struggling to unify after the failure of the Frankfort Assembly of 1848, which was meant to unify Germany. In 1862, William I, formerly known as Frederick William IV, was appointed king of the military state known as Prussia. As a result of disputes from the rising middle class, William I choose to hire Otto von Bismarck as chancellor in order to quiet the unrest. Otto von Bismarck was a realpolitik, someone whose decisions were based on practicality, not morals. The policies of Otto von Bismarck’s government represented the new kind of conservatism because they represented realpolitik through doing what’s best for the country by incorporating the growing idea of socialism into reforms, all while valuing…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck and Metternich
    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bismarck and Metternich

    Both, Metternich and Bismarck sought to bring unity and stability to their nations, but in different ways. While Metternich was hard at work using his diplomatic skills trying to prevent German unification during the first half of the nineteenth century, Bismarck on the other hand was known as the Iron Chancellor, in the later nineteenth century set on to unite Germany through his many wars.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics