A Child's Tissue

I feel that if a child's tissue was taken instead of an adult's, it wouldn't be a completely different argument. I feel that it would be the same argument but more intense because a child is not able of making autonomous decisions by themselves. In other words, taking tissue from a child unknowingly not only goes behind the child's back but it also goes behind the parents' backs because they are in charge of the child. Furthermore, "because children have not yet developed their capacities, it seems wrong to subject them to risks that might alter the course of their lives for the worse" (pg. 156). If the news came out about the tissue being taken from a child, I feel that there would have been a large backlash against the medical community.